When are Immediate Annuities Better than a Hybrid Annuity? - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[1]
Eric: Hi, I'm Eric Judy. Dick: And I'm Dick Van Dyke. Today, we want to talk
[5]
about immediate annuities and do a little comparison with immediate annuities and
[11]
why you might consider an immediate annuity. Eric: One of the things we often
[15]
hear, in today's world, where you have this hybrid annuity, which gives you
[20]
lifetime income as well as some other bonuses/extras, why would you ever want to
[25]
actually look at using an immediate annuity, where you're going to give up
[28]
your assets? Dick: Right. That is the difference, Eric. When we think about the
[31]
hybrid annuity, it's kind of your cake and eat it too annuity, where you can get your
[37]
lifetime income, but you don't have to give up your asset. Yet, there is a place
[42]
for an immediate annuity. In fact, let's do a little history lesson. How about some
[48]
trivia here? When we think about an immediate annuity, it literally goes back
[53]
to the early Roman Empire. They called it the "annua," and that's where the word
[59]
annuity comes from. So it is a very early form of an annuity, and it has really gone
[66]
through the test of time, spanned the centuries. Eric: So next time you have
[73]
your toga on, you'll know to get your annua language out. Exactly. It's an old
[79]
standard. It was the first kind of annuity out there, the standard lifetime annuity.
[84]
You gave up a lump sum, and you got a lifetime income stream. Dick: It is
[87]
probably the truest pension-style income. In fact, immediate annuities, a lot of
[93]
companies will offer a choice of a lump some or an immediate annuity. Eric: I
[99]
talked about immediate annuities with a lot of clients, when they were saying,
[103]
"Hey, I've got a 401(k). I want a lifetime income. What can I do to get my own
[109]
personal pension?" Dick: Yes. Eric: That's kind of how we think of it. The thing is
[113]
you're usually giving up that 401(k) in exchange for that lifetime income stream.
[117]
Now, the big thing here is you realize that none of those dollars are going on to
[122]
heirs. Dick: Yes. Well, in a true pension, there's no money in a pension, as a rule.
[129]
When you have a pension, when you pass, the money ends, or if you've chosen a
[135]
survivorship option, you've probably taken a little bit lower payment on your
[139]
pension, and then some of those payments will go on to perhaps a spouse. Eric:
[144]
Exactly. When I grew up, my parents were educators. So they had a traditional kind
[150]
of benefit program, where they have a retirement that's there as long as they
[154]
live. The bad thing is, once they're gone, nothing goes on to me. Being a little
[158]
self- serving here now. The 401(k) plan . . . Dick: Why didn't they get a hybrid
[163]
annuity? Eric: Exactly. Why can't they get a hybrid annuity? So when they're looking
[168]
at it, that's the old style. The hybrid, on the other hand, allows you to pass some
[172]
of those dollars on to heirs typically. Dick: Right. So, really, where the
[177]
immediate annuity fits, let's just give some examples. Someone who really wants to
[182]
start income right now. Eric: With an traditional immediate annuity, typically
[188]
you're going to get a higher payout than you would with a hybrid. Dick: Yes. Eric:
[191]
You're going to start with a little bit higher. . . Dick: Typically. But we have
[194]
seen a few instances where . . . you've got to run some illustrations to know.
[198]
Eric: Exactly. So that's one of the things that when people are going that direction,
[202]
that's usually the reason. Dick: General assumption is you're going to get more
[205]
income. Eric: A little bit more. A higher percentage to start with. Dick: Right.
[209]
Then the other key factor would be that, perhaps, if you're going to use an
[214]
immediate, you really aren't as concerned about giving money over to heirs. Eric:
[219]
Right. Are there ways to get money on to either survivors or heirs? That's one of
[223]
the things we . . . Dick: With an immediate? Eric: An immediate annuity. You
[225]
can structure it so that it's a joint lifetime payout. So if you and a spouse
[231]
purchase an immediate annuity, you can set it up so that it is the lifetime of both
[235]
of you or either of you. Whoever lives the longest, those payments will continue.
[240]
There are little tweaks that you can even do there, where you can set it up so that
[243]
once one passes, it sometimes reduces by a percentage. Dick: A percentage, so they
[247]
only get three-quarters or one half of the annuity. Eric: Right. The other way that
[252]
you can somewhat pass on dollars to heirs is there are a couple of things. You can
[256]
do a period certain, where it's lifetime with a certain number of years guaranteed.
[262]
A lot of times you'll see somebody do a lifetime annuity with 20 years guaranteed.
[268]
So that 20 years of payments is guaranteed. Dick: So if I pass in 5 years,
[273]
somebody is going to get another 15 years of payments. Eric: Correct. Dick: But what
[276]
does that do to my income? Eric: It's going to reduce your payments. You have to
[280]
realize going in, if your goal is the highest payout possible, you don't want to
[285]
add any of these other pieces. But if you're wanting to try to pass on money to
[290]
somebody, that's a way of guaranteeing basically that some of that comes back.
[296]
One of the things I always look at is either the installment refund or the cash
[300]
refund, which says once you purchase the immediate annuity, if you haven't gotten
[305]
back at least what you paid in principal wise, that amount will be refunded either
[310]
to your heirs or to your estate. Dick: Well, isn't that the installment refund?
[314]
Eric: The installment refund keeps the payments coming back to your return of
[319]
principal. Dick: Okay. So you're talking about the full lump sum. Eric: Yes, just a
[322]
refund of whatever you've put in, so it's either a lump sum or installment refund.
[327]
Dick: One of the biggest vulnerabilities that Eric and I look at with our clients,
[335]
and what we think you should be concerned about, is inflation. That is probably one
[340]
of the biggest vulnerabilities we face. We have had historic inflation the last 4
[347]
decades of over 4%. We believe that the stage is really set for some higher
[352]
inflation over the next two or three decades, which is going to cover most
[355]
retirees. So if we would happen to go through a stretch of 4% or 5% - I'm not
[360]
talking about runaway hyper third world country inflation - but if we're talking
[367]
4%, 4.5%, 5%, 6% inflation, that makes that immediate annuity, if you have no
[372]
inflation cost of living adjustment, a COLA on it, it really puts you at a
[376]
disadvantage. Eric: Yes, especially if you've got longevity in what you're
[379]
looking at. You realize you're taking a level payment and you're stretching it
[384]
over your lifetime. So your purchasing power is going to diminish with inflation.
[388]
Dick: Right. So one of the things that we do suggest, very strongly, is that
[394]
whatever type of annuity, whether it's an immediate annuity, a hybrid annuity, a
[399]
deferred annuity where you're deferring it for a long time, that you're really taking
[403]
inflation into account. There are different ways to structure for inflation,
[406]
but if you're not taking it into account, you're really setting yourself up for a
[411]
bad situation. Eric: Right. That's another aspect that you can add to an immediate
[415]
annuity. Some of them you can add a cost of living adjustment. Others have a fixed
[420]
percentage. Dick: Tied to a consumer price index or a fixed percentage. Eric: So
[424]
those are things you can add, but you realize you're going to start lower. Dick:
[428]
Your payments are going to start lower. Right. Eric: So it's all about the
[430]
tradeoffs. Dick: I love the idea of a real cost of living adjustment. So if things
[435]
get carried away and we start seeing 5% or 6% inflation, we've covered a major
[442]
vulnerability in a retirement plan. Eric: Yes. That's what we're looking at here.
[448]
When we're looking at immediate annuities, we're looking at you creating your own
[452]
personal pension. Dick: yes, that's right. Eric: If you're into this marketplace,
[457]
where you're going to create a personal pension, and you have that magic number
[461]
you know that you need to hit and you can anticipate the growth, that's where this
[465]
product really comes in. Dick: So if we're to kind of wind up this discussion on
[470]
immediate annuities, being a true pension-style income, where would we
[477]
summarize that this is going to fit? What type of person should buy an immediate
[480]
annuity, should really consider it for their retirement portfolio? Eric: I always
[484]
say it's someone with no heirs, that doesn't have to worry about passing on
[489]
dollars to somebody in the future. They're not worried about that. They want the
[492]
highest payout now, and that's really the person that I start with. Dick:
[500]
Right. I think that, in winding this up, we just want to say, do a fair comparison.
[505]
You may be the ideal person for an immediate annuity, but get with a
[508]
professional advisor, run some illustrations, compare it. We have
[512]
actually seen situations where a hybrid annuity can right off the bat outperform
[517]
an immediate annuity. It's not often, but it does happen. Eric: Yes. Very good.
[521]
Dick: Thank you. Eric: Have a great day.