Best Required Return for Investors to Use? - YouTube

Channel: Learn to Invest - Investors Grow

[0]
hi i'm jimmy in this video we're looking
[2]
at what we should use for our required
[4]
rate of return for investments and even
[8]
what required rate of return is the best
[9]
required rate of return to use
[12]
now i actually in the later half of this
[14]
video i tested out whether or not
[15]
discounted free cash show really helps
[17]
us outperform the stock market but we'll
[19]
come back to that in a minute but
[21]
basically picking the correct required
[23]
rate of return or picking a good
[24]
required rate of return is crucial
[26]
because this helps us identify where we
[28]
should buy whatever stock we might be
[30]
interested in so here's what i mean so
[33]
this is our discounted free cash flow
[35]
calculation using johnson and johnson
[37]
stock as our test company this is going
[39]
to be our sort of case study now these
[42]
analyst estimates down here well these
[43]
are actual estimates for free cash flow
[46]
coming from a handful of analysts we can
[48]
see how many analysts are contributing
[50]
to each cash flow projection well if we
[53]
discount our free cash flow estimates by
[56]
our required rate of return the one that
[58]
i've chosen is seven half percent well
[60]
we get a fair value of johnson and
[62]
johnson's stock of about 211 bucks per
[65]
share now i know finding analyst
[67]
estimates can be tricky and that's
[68]
actually one of the reasons we're
[69]
building this website where we can we
[72]
will have this data available and
[74]
similar functionality and that you can
[76]
just punch in the ticker it'll
[77]
automatically pull down whatever the
[79]
analyst estimates are for free cash flow
[81]
or revenue and then
[83]
it will kick out what the fair value of
[84]
that stock is we expect to have the
[86]
website up up and running in about six
[88]
months or so so that's the point of the
[90]
website to help you calculate the fair
[92]
value very very quickly but we still
[95]
have to choose a required rate of return
[96]
that's sort of the point of this video
[98]
that's how this video fits into this
[99]
whole thing now in the meantime while
[101]
the website's getting built well we're
[103]
actually we have a private investing
[104]
community where we do weekly live
[106]
streams and one of those live streams we
[108]
use this spreadsheet this is a
[110]
spreadsheet i built to give to the web
[112]
developers to show them where we're
[113]
trying to go with this as far as
[114]
functionality is concerned hopefully
[116]
they make it looking look even better
[117]
than this but we get the point in those
[120]
live streams we use this spreadsheet to
[122]
calculate the fair value of a bunch of
[124]
stocks that the community gives to us so
[126]
if you were to sign up for access to
[128]
this website today
[130]
you'll get access to the to the
[132]
community which is over on discord and
[134]
the private live streams but the good
[136]
part is that the price whatever you sign
[138]
up for today will never go up on you so
[140]
once the website is up and running again
[142]
in about six months or so well you'll be
[145]
locked in at the price you're paying
[147]
today and that will never ever go up on
[148]
you i will leave a link in the
[150]
description below as to how to sign up
[151]
for the website and the community in the
[153]
live streams and all of that okay now
[155]
back to the required return so we can
[157]
see here that instead of using seven and
[159]
a half percent well if we used 10
[162]
well the price we would need to pay
[164]
would be less than 140 bucks per share
[166]
and if we wanted 12 and a half percent
[168]
well we'd have to pay less than 104
[170]
bucks per share and if we think about it
[173]
this is logical if we want a higher
[176]
return a logical way to get a higher
[178]
return is to pay a lower price for the
[180]
same in this case the same stock now if
[183]
we don't want to pick an individual
[185]
number what most textbooks tell us to do
[188]
is to use something like the weighted
[190]
average cost of capital for each company
[192]
it's different it depends on the company
[193]
and it changes for every company
[196]
this right here is the current weighted
[198]
average cost of capital for our case
[200]
study here now i did a whole video on
[201]
how to calculate the weighted average
[202]
cost of capital and i'll leave a link to
[204]
that video in the description below okay
[206]
so that's the basics of where the
[207]
numbers come from and how they affect
[209]
what we should consider paying for each
[211]
stock that we're researching but now the
[213]
real question is which one works the
[215]
best clearly that depends on a few
[218]
different things how much of do we need
[221]
our portfolio to return for us how much
[223]
are we willing to risk those are two
[226]
very basic examples of some questions we
[228]
would ask ourselves now one of the
[230]
questions that i get a lot is why am i
[232]
using required rate of return of seven
[234]
and a half percent isn't that too low i
[236]
mean if the stock market is returned
[237]
let's say on average 10 a year
[240]
why would i have a required rate of
[242]
return that's less than that now i
[244]
actually have an answer to this so my
[246]
seven and a half percent required rate
[248]
of return is about five percent higher
[251]
than the average
[253]
aaa corporate bond rate so i figure it
[255]
makes sense for us to
[258]
require a premium over an investment in
[261]
bonds if we're going to invest in stocks
[262]
we should return more than we would get
[264]
if we invested in bonds i picked five
[266]
percent over bonds because that's about
[269]
what warren buffett used
[271]
as his hurdle rate back when he ran
[273]
buffett partnerships
[274]
so he had a uh rate that he said he
[277]
could have earned at least this amount
[279]
and he had it was about it was a few
[280]
percentage points higher than the aaa
[282]
corporate bond rating right now the aaa
[284]
corporate bond interest rate is about
[286]
two and a half percent hence the seven
[288]
half percent that's five percent higher
[290]
and if we're curious if we look at the
[291]
corporate bond rate the triple a
[293]
corporate bond rate going back to 1971
[295]
well this is what the moody's
[297]
aaa corporate bond interest rate has
[300]
looked like going back the past 50 years
[302]
now i've found many investors have come
[304]
to me and said something along the lines
[306]
of uh you know what i won't accept any i
[309]
will the minimum i will ever use is a 12
[311]
and a half percent required rate of
[313]
return and on one hand that's logical it
[316]
is logical today but is that the highest
[319]
interest rate we'll ever use is that the
[321]
highest required return we'll ever use
[323]
what if it was back in this time period
[325]
well in that case it wouldn't make any
[327]
sense to use a 12 and a half percent
[328]
return my point is that if we're picking
[331]
a hard number just to pick a hard number
[334]
i think it makes more sense to tie that
[336]
to something otherwise things can change
[339]
from a macroeconomic perspective but now
[341]
sticking with today the funny part about
[344]
this uh the pushback that people give me
[345]
about using seven half percent is that i
[347]
actually don't disagree with 12 and a
[349]
half percent from a required return
[351]
perspective
[352]
in fact the average bond rate through
[354]
the past 50 years has been on average
[358]
about 7.3 percent add my 5 premium to
[361]
this whole thing and when we end up with
[364]
a average average required return of
[366]
about 12 and a half percent through this
[369]
time period 12.3 but here's why i prefer
[372]
to use my method of a premium over the
[374]
triple a corporate bond rate instead of
[376]
using a fixed 12 and a half percent rate
[379]
and that's because i like to add a
[380]
margin of safety to my calculations so
[384]
over on our current website here well
[386]
one of the features that we will be
[388]
including in the website is the ability
[390]
to add a margin of safety calculation to
[393]
our investment analysis and basically
[396]
this house this allows us to adjust in
[398]
this case our 211 number if we said all
[402]
right what does that work how does that
[404]
number look if we had a 10 margin of
[406]
safety or 20 or 15 or whatever number we
[408]
decide to add to it basically what this
[411]
is is the buffer we want to add that
[413]
what if this calculation isn't exactly
[415]
correct let's add a margin of safety to
[417]
that so we buy it in theory below that
[419]
margin of safety below our calculation
[422]
of fair value now i prefer the margin of
[423]
safety method because it allows us to be
[426]
a bit more adaptable to each situation
[429]
so let's say we're analyzing a company
[430]
that has very little investment risk
[433]
very little business risk or maybe not a
[436]
little business risk but it has less
[437]
business risk than another investment
[439]
well we could add a smaller margin of
[441]
safety if it has what we perceive to be
[443]
less risk what if a company on the flip
[445]
side has a lot more risk well
[448]
you could add a wider margin of safety
[451]
if we're using let's say hypothetically
[453]
12 and a half percent no matter what in
[455]
fact some stocks the less risky stocks
[458]
you may never be able to invest in now
[460]
like i mentioned before another option
[462]
is to use the weighted average cost of
[463]
capital so
[465]
if we were to use the weighted average
[467]
cost of capital well that essentially
[469]
has the volatility of the stock
[472]
baked into the whole thing it also has
[473]
the risk-free rate generally the 10-year
[475]
treasury has that baked into the
[477]
calculation so that is essentially a
[480]
premium over the 10 over the risk-free
[482]
rate plus a twist for some volatility so
[484]
if we have no idea of what required
[486]
return we want to use we should just use
[488]
the weighted average cost of capital
[490]
this is a tried and tested method and
[492]
generally works fairly well now i'm
[494]
actually analyzing them i've actually
[496]
been doing a study recently where i'm
[497]
analyzing the effectiveness of discount
[499]
of free cash flow and one of the tests
[502]
that i've already performed
[504]
is on johnson and johnson
[506]
now i'll be doing a lot more of these
[508]
tests on the live stream so if you're
[509]
curious come sign up for that and i
[511]
actually already showed the private live
[513]
stream some of the results of this test
[516]
but basically what i did is i took free
[517]
cash flow going out the next few years
[520]
going as far back as i could and i
[522]
discounted those numbers back to the
[525]
last day of each year and they compared
[527]
it to compare the fair value calculation
[530]
to the current price of that stock on
[532]
that day our calculations of fair value
[536]
are the blue lines on this chart ideally
[538]
we only buy the stock when the stock the
[541]
our calculation fair value is above the
[543]
current price so it's trading at some
[545]
sort of discount if we were to consider
[547]
some sort of margin of safety well we'd
[549]
want a wider discount now we can see
[551]
with this chart if we used a 10 12 and a
[554]
half percent required rate of return for
[556]
johnson and johnson if we used it
[557]
through this entire time period well we
[559]
never would have had the opportunity to
[560]
buy it what about ten percent again we
[563]
never would have had the chance to buy
[564]
it what about if we use seven and a half
[566]
percent well here at least with seven
[569]
and a half percent we'd have some
[570]
opportunity to buy it
[572]
but i could easily make the same
[574]
argument that seven half percent makes
[576]
sense today because of the where the
[578]
corporate bond rate is but it wouldn't
[579]
have made sense many years ago so let's
[582]
skip right to the weighted average cost
[583]
of capital now this one was a bit tricky
[585]
to calculate so i want i only went back
[587]
about the past 20 or so years but we can
[589]
see that the concept still held up quite
[592]
well with the weighted average cost of
[593]
capital we had plenty of times to jump
[596]
in and buy the stock and those stu the
[598]
stock would have performed quite well in
[601]
fact the performance if we bought only
[602]
one was trading at a discount to our
[604]
calculation of fair value well we would
[605]
have drastically outperformed the stock
[608]
on the years that we didn't buy it that
[610]
way so if we bought it when it was
[611]
overvalued you would have underperformed
[613]
you bought it was undervalued we would
[614]
outperform just as we would expect now
[617]
i'm trying to test this on more and more
[618]
companies for example here's what
[621]
microsoft's fair value looks like
[623]
compared to the stock price from each
[625]
individual year now this again goes back
[627]
about the past 20 years now what if we
[630]
bought this stock and we overpaid here
[632]
back when the stock price was way too
[634]
high compared to discounted free cash
[636]
flow well our average return over that
[638]
time period would have been about 16
[641]
per year not bad but if we waited for
[643]
microsoft stock to become undervalued
[646]
and we didn't buy it until here until it
[648]
was actually undervalued back in about
[650]
2011 or so well the average return jumps
[653]
from 16
[654]
to more than 31
[656]
per year so clearly using the weighted
[658]
average cost of capital works well
[661]
which is why all the textbooks say that
[663]
we should use it so unless we have a
[665]
logical reason to use a different
[667]
required rate of return i think it makes
[669]
sense for most investors to start with
[672]
the weighted average cost of capital and
[673]
then adjust from there and this is one
[675]
of the primary reasons we're going to
[677]
have this on the website so we could do
[679]
the quick calculation for you we don't
[680]
have to you don't have to worry about
[681]
trying to come up with those numbers now
[683]
one of the things that i like to do is
[684]
to use my own required rate of return
[686]
but then take a quick quick peek at the
[688]
weight of average cost of capital to see
[690]
if it helps or hurts
[692]
our investment story do we want to
[695]
invest in it because the weight average
[696]
cost of capital money might sway us one
[698]
way or another so for the upcoming
[700]
website i will leave a link in the
[702]
description below so you can sign up for
[704]
that
[704]
thank you so much and i will see you in
[706]
the next video