The fractured politics of a browning America - YouTube

Channel: Vox

[0]
How a more diverse America makes you feel is the core division in our political and
[4]
cultural fights right now.
[6]
But to see why, you need to know how we’re changing, and how a changing country changes
[11]
us.
[18]
Here’s the big picture.
[20]
The U.S. is at a demographic tipping point - a genuinely historic moment.
[24]
2013 was the first year that a majority of US infants under the age of 1 were nonwhite.
[29]
By 2016, white deaths had outnumbered white births, but America’s overall population,
[33]
it’s not expected to decrease.
[35]
And that’s because the Black, Asian and especially Latino and mixed-race populations
[40]
they’re also growing.
[41]
They’re growing fast.
[42]
By 2045, the Census Bureau projects that non-Hispanic whites will be no longer be a majority.
[47]
And also that foreign-born residents are going to make up a record share of the population.
[52]
So when you show people these numbers about how America is changing, what goes through
[56]
their heads, what is their response?
[57]
I think people are hearing these changes as somehow a fundamental remaking
[66]
of what America is, at least a lot of people are hearing it, and some of them are excited
[70]
about it and some of them are not so excited.
[72]
We see on average white Americans when they read about this majority-minority shift becoming
[78]
more politically conservative.
[80]
Jennifer Richeson is a psychologist who studies how people react to demographic
[84]
change.
[84]
She won a MacArthurGenius Grant for this work.
[86]
And what she’s found helps explain a lot of what we’re seeing.
[89]
For instance, when white political independents who live in the West were told that whites
[93]
were no longer a majority in California, they became 11 percentage points more likely to support the
[98]
Republican Party.
[99]
That is a huge change.
[100]
It’s important to say, this is a human reaction to demographic change, not just a white one.
[105]
When presented with similar data on the growing numbers of Hispanics, Asian-Americans shifted
[109]
towards more conservative views, Black Americans shifted towards more conservative views.
[113]
Being told your group is shrinking
[115]
or that it's losing power, it's scary for anyone.
[117]
Losing numbers are associated with losing status, losing power, losing currency
[124]
in the culture.
[125]
There are lots of studies like these, but the one I find myself thinking about the
[128]
most was done by Harvard’s Ryan Enos.
[130]
What we did is we sent these two Spanish speakers out to catch a train at a certain
[135]
time every day over a period of days.
[138]
We sent out research assistants and they surveyed these people waiting on the train.
[142]
And that little exposure was enough to move these attitudes in this survey.
[146]
They're more likely to say we should send those children of immigrants back to Mexico.
[150]
They're more likely to say we should decrease immigration from Mexico and they're even more
[155]
likely to endorse that English should be the official language of the United States.
[159]
We saw a version of this in the election then too, right?
[162]
So in States and even in small areas of States in these counties, where the Spanish
[166]
population changed very rapidly - we saw that these voters had moved towards supporting
[172]
Donald Trump.
[173]
And a lot of them actually looked like they were these people who had previously been
[176]
Democrats.
[177]
So here, then, is what we know: Even gentle, unconscious exposure to reminders
[182]
that America is diversifying — and particularly to the idea that America is becoming a majority-minority
[186]
nation — it pushes folks toward more conservative policy opinions, towards more support of the
[191]
Republican Party.
[192]
So what happens when those reminders aren’t gentle?
[194]
Massive demographic changes have been foisted upon the American people.
[199]
And they’re changes that, none of us ever voted for and most of us don’t like.
[203]
Our Christian heritage will be cherished, protected, defended like you've never seen
[212]
before.
[215]
When Obama was elected in 2008, there was all this talk of America moving into a
[219]
post-racial moment.
[220]
But the mere existence of Obama’s presidency made a lot more of politics about how you
[225]
felt about race.
[226]
It had this effect on health care, the stimulus package, Hillary Clinton, the Democratic party.
[231]
Hell, it even affected how people felt about Obama’s dog.
[234]
So the dog is is kind of a fun experiment on a serious topic.
[240]
Both Teddy Kennedy, a well-known liberal Democrat, and Barack Obama have the same dog.
[245]
Their two dogs are actually related Portuguese water dogs.
[248]
So let's see how people respond to these dogs when you tell one that it's Ted Kennedy and
[255]
one that it is Barack Obama's.
[257]
What happens is that when you tell people it's Barack Obama's racial liberals like the dog more
[262]
racial conservatives like the dog less.
[265]
Obama polarizes more because of who he is rather than what he says and does.
[271]
And so Obama goes through great lengths in both campaigns to try to tamp down racial divisions
[277]
to not talk about race. When he does talk about race, he does so in a message of personal
[284]
responsibility.
[285]
And there was something real here.
[286]
A few decades ago a multiracial voter base, it couldn’t drive American politics like it
[291]
can now.
[291]
Obama won in 2012 with only 39 percent of the white vote -- previous Democratic candidates,
[297]
they lost elections in big ways with a lot more support by whites.
[301]
But by 2016, Trump also proved that a candidate who is explicitly talking to white fears about
[307]
race could win.
[308]
The Republicans now have a temptation to explicitly appeal to race.
[313]
And you're seeing this throughout Republican primaries in the 2018 cycle and you're seeing
[319]
the reverse on the Democratic side.
[322]
Abolish ICE as a good example.
[324]
That is a policy that Democrats would not have been on board with in the 1990s but their
[331]
bases have moved and so the incentives have moved as well.
[335]
Now to say American politics is in for turbulence is not to say we are in for
[338]
dissolution or civil war.
[340]
California went through these changes, it experienced this demographic shift and it
[344]
didn’t fall to pieces.
[345]
But leading up to that, there was a lot of friction.
[348]
Voters passed racially-charged propositions targeting undocumented immigrants, they banned
[352]
affirmative action, they restricted bilingual education.
[354]
But we also know, right, there are States that have large populations of racial
[362]
minorities — largely Black Americans but they're growing in Latinos — that are incredibly
[366]
unequal in every way.
[368]
Right, so the question is you know we want to think ‘Oh it'll work out, look at California.’
[372]
But it could work out and be Mississippi.
[374]
As the browning of America continues, this cycle of hope about the future activating
[378]
fears about the present, it’s just going to keep going.
[381]
In that, politicians who can articulate a vision of this future that is inclusive and inspiring
[386]
and nonthreatening — that very mixture Obama sought in '08 — they could reap massive
[391]
rewards.
[392]
But as long as much of the country feels threatened by the changes they see,
[395]
there's also going to be a continuing,
[397]
and maybe even a growing, market for politicians like Donald Trump.