How Carbon Nanotubes Will Change the World - YouTube

This video was made possible by Curiosity Stream.

Get access to exclusive content from the Real Engineering team, like the Logistic of D-Day

series and our new podcast by signing up to the Nebula and CuriosityStream deal for the

amazingly low price of 14.79 a year.

In 1991 a Japanese physicist, Sumio Iijima, conducted a momentous experiment.

An experiment that introduced the world to material so strong that it could revolutionise

how engineers approach design.

Taking two graphite rods as electrodes, Sumio applied a current across the rods.

A spark arched between them and with it a cloud of carbon gas puffed into existence,

vaporising the tip of the anode rod.

As the carbon laden air settled on the chamber walls it formed a thin layer of black soot,

within it a strange new material appeared.

Tiny single layer straws of carbon.

Sumio Iijima had just created carbon nanotubes.

[1]

Laboratory testing of these mysterious little tubes in the following years would reveal

that these nanometer-wide hexagonal lattices of carbon had the strongest tensile strength

known to man, and this was just As one of the many incredible material properties they

displayed.

Carbon nanotubes are light, conductive and biocompatible.

[2]

It soon became clear that the carbon nanotube had the potential to be the building block

of futuristic new technologies.

The most efficient computers, transformative medical devices, synthetic muscles, or perhaps

the most ambitious of all, space elevators, the dream of countless sci-fi authors,

Carbon nanotubes has promised to be the catalyst for the next revolution in technology.

But, putting this revolutionary material to work will not be easy.

It turns out that building a fibre, that is actually a single molecule, of any significant

length is incredibly difficult.

To understand this fascinating molecule, let’s dive into the chemical makeup of carbon nanotubes.

Carbon is a very familiar element.

It’s in everything we eat, sleep on and step over.

It is the element that holds our DNA together.

It forms the carbohydrates, proteins and lipids that we depend on to build and fuel our bodies.

It’s the basis of life as we know it.

It’s ubiquity in our lives is a result of its versatility.

It’s chemical properties allow it to take many different shapes, each impacting it’s

material properties in diverse and unique ways.

To understand this we need to understand the basic models of how we visualize electron

orbits around the nucleus of an atom.

To start we have the simplified bohr model, which separates the electrons into shells.

The first shell can contain 2 electrons, while the next shell can hold 8.

An atom wants to fill each shell to be stable.

Let’s take an atom of carbon, which has 6 electrons, to see how this plays out.

[3]

First we fill the first shell with it’s 2 electrons, then we have 4 electrons left

to fill the next shell, leaving 4 open positions in its outer shell

The 4 open positions mean that carbon willingly interacts with many other elements as well

as itself.

Often by sharing electrons in a special type of bond, called a covalent bond.

This versatility allows carbon to create many different kinds of molecules.

Take hydrocarbons.

Hydrogen has 1 electron, and seeks 1 electron to fill it’s inner shell.

So, carbon likes to form 4 covalent bonds with 4 hydrogen atoms to form a stable 8 electron

outer shell, while helping hydrogen form a stable 2 electron shell.

This is methane, an incredibly common molecule that is the main ingredient in natural gas

fuels.

This is just one arrangement carbon can take.

Hydrocarbons take a huge range of shapes and configurations, but what we are interested

in is how carbon bonds to itself, but this simplified Bohr model doesn’t give us an

understanding of how carbon to carbon bonds take radically different shapes.

We need to dive a little deeper before we can understand the magic of carbon nanotubes.

Electrons don’t travel in neat 2D circular orbits as the Bohr model would suggest, in

fact we can’t even know the position and speed of an electron.

Instead we can make predictions about electrons' general locations in 3D space.

We call these orbitals, and they are regions where we have about a 90% certainty that an

electron is located somewhere within that region.

This can get pretty complicated, but for now we just need to concern ourselves with two

types.

S and P orbitals.

[4]

S orbitals are spherical in shape with the nucleus of the atom at their centre.

P orbitals are often called dumbbell shaped, but I don’t know what gym these nerds are

going to, because I have never seen a dumbbell like this.

It’s more like a figure of 8 shape like the infinity symbol.

In the ground state, electrons will occupy the lowest energy orbitals first, which in

this case is the 1S orbital.

It can hold two electrons.

Next we have the 2S orbital, which is a larger sphere, and can also hold 2 electrons.

Then we have our three P orbitals, one aligned along the X, Y and Z axis, each capable of

holding 2 electrons.

Carbon in its ground state has the 1S and 2S orbitals filled, with one electron in the

Px orbital and one in the Py orbital.

To be stable, Carbon wants to fill these three p orbitals with 2 electrons each.

Now this where things get a little funky and confusing, and it will be on your final exam.

Carbon can bond to itself in different ways that affect these orbital shapes.

Take diamonds.

To fill these orbitals, carbon bonds with 4 neighbouring carbon atoms.

To do this it promotes one electron from it’s 2S orbital into the empty Pz orbital.

[5] This Pz orbital is higher energy than the 2S orbital, and the electron doesn’t

want to stay there, so the carbon atom takes on new hybrid orbital shapes to compensate.

This is called sp3 hybridisation, which is a mixture of S and P orbital shapes and looks

something like this.

Where one side of the figure of 8 expands while the other contracts.

The 2S and 3 P orbitals are transformed into these new SP3 orbital shapes.

They repel each other equally in this 3D space to form this four lobed tetrahedral shape

with 109.5 degrees between each lobe.

Covalent bonds now form between the carbon molecules where these orbital lobes overlap

head on in what’s called a sigma bond.

This creates a repeating structure like this and it’s this rigid framework of carbon

atoms that makes diamond extremely hard.

Now, what’s fascinating to me, is that you can take the same carbon atoms and now form

graphite, a material so soft that we use it as pencil lead and as a lubricant.

How does that work?

Here a different hybridisation occurs.

Once again 1 electron from the 2S orbital is promoted into the Pz orbital, but this

time the S orbital hybridizes with only 2 of the P orbitals, giving us the name SP2

hybridization.

[5] This gives us three SP hybrid orbitals and 1 regular P orbitals.

This new arrangement causes the orbitals to take a new shape, with the 3 SP orbitals arranging

themselves in a flat plane separated by 120 degrees, with the P orbital perpendicular

to them.

Now, when the carbon atoms combine, the heads of the SP orbitals overlap once again to form

this flat hexagonal shape.

A hexagon pattern is naturally a very strong and energy-efficient shape.

For example, bees don’t intentionally build honeycombs in hexagons.

They form as a result of the warm bee bodies melting the wax and the triple junction hardens

in the strongest formation.

[6] The shape is frequently used in aerospace applications where high strength and low weight

is a priority.

These SP2 bonds are stronger than SP3 bonds, because they have a higher s character.

This sounds complicated, but all it means is that they are more like S orbitals than

a P orbitals.

Because there are 3 SP bonds, they have a 33% S character, whereas SP3 orbitals have

4 SP bonds giving them 25% S character.

S orbitals are closer to the nucleus, making SP2 bonds shorter and more electronegative

than SP3 bonds, and thus stronger.

[7]

This hexagonal structure and strong bonds make graphene exceedingly strong.

Laboratory testing of graphene using atomic force microscopes has shown graphene has a

young's modulus of 0.5 TPa and an ultimate tensile strength 130 gigapascals.

[8]

So strong that if we could somehow create a large perfect sheep of graphene, which we

can’t, we could build an invisible single atom deep hammock that could support the weight

of a cat.

[9] Imagine the amount of cats we could confuse.

That’s the world I want to live in.

That’s an entertaining, but not terribly useful application, but graphene is a very

common material and the form we are used to, graphite, is not strong.

This hexagonal shape itself is extremely strong, but because graphite forms these single atom

layer sheets with only weak van der waal forces holding them together, the sheets can easily

slide over each other, which is the reason graphite is so soft.

[10]

Now what is interesting is that carbon nanotubes take the same repeating hexagonal structure

as graphite.

The ends of the sheets are simply loops and connect with themselves to form a tube, and

this structure is what gives carbon nanotubes their incredible strength.

Researchers found that single-walled nanotubes have strength similar to that of graphite,

about 130 Gigapascals.

[11]

For the non-engineers in the crowd, let me rephrase that.

It’s a lot.

About 100 times greater than steel, and to boot it’s vastly lighter.

If this material could be feasibly manufactured into a single extremely long fibre, it could

potentially open up entirely new design possibilities.

Like the space elevator.

I’d explain exactly why carbon fibres would make space elevators possible now, but I already

did that in a past video that I will link at the end of this one.

So where are there space elevators?

Here lies the difficulty.

Manufacturing carbon nanotubes.

Carbon nanotubes strength relies on creating a continuous perfect lattice of carbon atoms

in a long tube, and that process is not something we have yet developed.

So how can we create carbon nanotubes?

Things have changed a bit since the days of Sumio Ijima’s first discovery.

The most promising method for industrial scale production of high purity carbon nanotubes

is chemical vapor deposition.

[12]

In this manufacturing method, a precursor gas containing carbon, like methane (CH4)

is introduced into a vacuum chamber and heated.

As the heat increases inside the chamber the bonds between the carbon and hydrogen atoms

begin to decompose.

The carbon then diffuses into a melted metal catalyst substrate.

This then becomes a metal-carbon solution, which eventually becomes supersaturated with

carbon.

At this point the carbon starts to precipitate out and form carbon nanotubes..

While the hydrogen bi-product is vented out of the chamber to avoid an explosion.

Our research has focused on increasing the length of these nanotubes while not sacrificing

their structure, yield or quantity.

While some labs have gotten individual tubes as long as 50 cm it’s been a struggle to

get larger bundles of tubes, which are called forests, to a length greater than 2cm. [13]

This is because the catalyst is guaranteed to deactivate at some point during the growth

process, terminating the growth of the nanotube.

The key to growing longer nanotubes is minimizing the probability of the catalyst deactivation

[14]

In 2020, a research team based in Japan managed to grow a forest over 15 cms in length, 7

times longer than anyone else, using a new method of chemical vapor deposition that managed

to keep the catalyst active for 26 hours.

[15]

They did this by adding a layer of gadolinium to a conventional iron-aluminium oxide catalyst

coated onto a silicon substrate.

Then using a lower chamber temperature, small concentrations of iron and aluminum vapor

were added into the chamber.

These factors combined managed to keep the iron-aluminium oxide catalyst active for much

longer.

[16]

This method is a major leap forward that could allow carbon nanotube products to begin entering

the market, but we are still a long way from a space elevator.

Most products today call for the fibres to be woven together to form a textile like yarn.

One study I found wove together 1 mm long nanotubes and into a yarn and then impregnated

that with an epoxy resin to form a composite material, which had a pretty good tensile

strength of 1.6 Gigapascals.

[17] Beating aluminium in its strength to weight capabilities, but below a traditional

carbon fibre composite.

However, these new longer nanotubes may give us stronger woven fibres in future.

It’s important to remember that carbon nanotubes aren’t just strong.

Their most exciting new term applications will come about as a result of their other

material properties.

Like their conductive abilities.

Like graphite, nanotubes are highly conductive, because each carbon atom is only bonded to

3 other carbon atoms, each atom has 1 free valence electron available for electrical

conduction.

Making carbon nanotubes excellent conductors.

The conducting core of cables that make up our overhead grid lines are typically made

from aluminium.

Even though aluminium is a poorer conductor than copper, and thus causes a greater loss

in power over the lines.

It’s used because it’s cheaper and lighter.

Allowing support structures for overhead lines to be spaced further apart.

Individual nanotubes are orders of magnitudes more conductive than copper, but creating

a yarn of nanotubes that could match copper has been a challenge.

Electrons move through individual nanotubes very efficiently, but when the tube comes

to an end the current meets resistance when jumping to a neighbouring tube.

So these longer tubes developed last year are opening doors to conductors that are vastly

lighter than aluminium and more conductive than copper.

[18]

These could be used for grid connections, allowing our power lines to be stretch further

without supports and minimize the loss of power to heat resistance, but for now the

price of nanotubes likely shuts that door.

Instead we could see these wires being used in super lightweight aircraft or cars.

They are even being investigated as a means of helping composite structure planes, like

the 787, survive lightning strikes.

The 787 is primarily composed of carbon and glass fibre reinforced plastics, but because

they do not conduct electricity, the plane has additional conductive structures added

to protect it from lightning strikes,

like a thin copper mesh.

[19] This mesh adds weight that increases fuel consumption.

This could be drastically reduced by including a carbon nanotube mesh on the surface of the

composite instead.

Nanotubes are quite elastic.

Capable of stretching to 18% of their original length and returning to their original shape

after.

This could allow conductive carbon fibre wires to be incorporated into wearable technology.

The carbon fibre threads can even be treated like a normal thread and sewn into a fabric

using a sewing machine.

Perhaps the most exciting application is in biomedical devices.

[20] Carbon nanotubes are biocompatible.

Meaning they are not toxic, non reactive, and do not elicit an immune response.

Combine this with their conductivity,flexibility and strength, nanotubes become extremely attractive

as neural interface material.

A large part of Neuralink, Elon Musk’s neural interface companies, efforts have been focusing

on creating smaller wires and the machines needed to implant them.

Larger, stiffer wires tear into flexible brain tissue over time and causes scar tissue to

form around the wire, preventing signals from passing from the neurons to the wires.

Nanotube wiring could be made smaller and more flexible while being accepted by the

body.

A potentially game changing material for biomedical implants.

As with every major material innovation, from age hardened aluminium ushering in a new age

of aviation, to silicon semiconductors opening up an entire new world for computers, carbon

nanotubes have the potential to open the door to design possibilities and technologies we

have yet to imagine.

New materials radically change how and what we build, and learning more about manufacturing

processes for complex machines really gives you insight on how a material like this could

change things.

One of my favourite series on CuriosityStream.

How to Build teaches you exactly that.

An in depth series that takes you onto the manufacturing floor of super cars, jumbo jet

wings and a satellites.

It’s a fantastic 3 parts series that along is worth the 14.79 price of curiosity stream,

but along with this series you get access to thousands of documentaries by award winning

filmmakers, and you will get access to Nebula.

The streaming service I started with over 100 other informative YouTube creators, like

MBKHD, Wendover Productions and Mustard.

Nebula, is the home of all of Real Engineering’s current and future exclusive content, like

the Logistics of D-Day series and our upcoming Battle of Britain series, which will release

some time later this year.

By signing up for this bundle deal you unlock budgets for our team to continue creating

these series and improves the quality of animations and research we can do right here on YouTube

too.

Sign up today for under 15 dollars to support this channel in the most effective way possible,

and get an amazing deal for yourself in the process.

If you are looking for something else to watch right now, why not watch our last video on

the future of nuclear space propulsion, or watch Real Science latest video “The Insane

Biology of the Hammerhead Shark”.