CONTROVERSIES Over the Role of GOVERNMENT in the Gilded Age [APUSH Review 6.12] Period 6: 1865-1898 - YouTube

Channel: Heimler's History

[0]
Well hey there and welcome back to Heimler’s  History. So we’ve been going through Unit 6  
[2]
of the AP U.S. History curriculum and in  this video it’s time to talk about the  
[5]
controversies over the role of government  during the Gilded Age, and that means it’s  
[9]
about to get saucy. So if you’re ready to get  them brain cows milked, then let's get to it.
[14]
So all through this unit we’ve been talking  about the rise of industry in America and  
[16]
how that changed the production of goods and  the demographics of cities and the structure  
[21]
of classes. Long story short, the rise of  industry was a big deal during the Gilded  
[25]
Age. And one of the most pointed and fierce  debates that occurred in this time was with  
[29]
respect to the role government should take in  relationship to all these changing realities.
[33]
And the truth is, this debate about the role  of the federal government in the economy is  
[37]
one that stretches back to the founding  of the country. That was one of the main  
[41]
fights between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas  Jefferson with respect to the National Bank. It  
[45]
reared its head again when debates over Henry  Clay’s American System erupted in Congress,  
[49]
and they argued fiercely about whether the  government ought to sponsor infrastructure  
[53]
improvements like roads and canals. And I could  name many other examples, but the point is,  
[58]
controversies over the role of government in  the economy is not a new thing in this period.
[62]
So in the last few videos I’ve mentioned a  lot of realities that argued FOR government  
[66]
intervention in business, things like unfair  labor practices and the growing gap between  
[70]
the rich and the poor. So in this video I’m  going to focus on the other side of the debate,  
[74]
namely, the arguments that were being  made against government regulation.
[77]
So in order to get into this, let’s remind  ourselves about the dominant economic ideology  
[81]
during this period, namely, laissez-faire  economics. Now laissez-faire is French for  
[86]
“leave alone,” or “let alone,” or whatever, some  French speaker always corrects me in the comments.  
[91]
[Call Matt, what does laissez faire mean?] Anyway  this way of understanding economics is this:  
[93]
just leave everything alone and  eventually all shall be well.
[96]
Now the industrialists and the politicians  who supported them didn’t make up this way  
[100]
of thinking. It actually goes back to 1776 when  Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations. His  
[105]
argument was that economies are best governed by  the laws of supply and demand, and that if you  
[109]
just let people make decisions in their own best  interest then the invisible hand of the market  
[113]
will always flourish best under those conditions  and therefore lead to the flourishing of society.
[118]
Now the problem is that while Gilded Age  politicians and tycoons were spouting off  
[122]
about Adam Smith and the invisible hand,  they apparently forgot that the scenario  
[126]
they created was nothing like what Adam Smith  envisioned. One vital ingredient for a healthy  
[131]
economy in Smith’s view is competition, but  these business leaders had so consolidated  
[136]
power in their respective industries that  competition vanished like a fart in the wind.
[140]
But that didn’t keep these folks from arguing  against government regulation in business or  
[143]
the economy as a whole. And that was true  even during economic downturns. During the  
[147]
severe Panic of 1893 President Grover Cleveland  largely did nothing to alleviate the economic  
[153]
disaster for many Americans who ended up  standing in bread lines to feed themselves.
[157]
And even when the federal government did get  involved, they did so half-heartedly. For example,  
[161]
in 1886 the Supreme Court handed down  a decision in a case whose name you  
[165]
don’t really need to know, but the decision  basically said that states couldn’t regulate  
[169]
railroads. And so the government created  a federal agency called the Interstate  
[172]
Commerce Commission to ensure that states  didn’t violate this law. But the ICC was  
[177]
deeply underfunded and therefore had no  real power to meddle in states’ affairs.
[186]
So all that to say, laissez faire was the  rule of the game during the Gilded Age,  
[189]
both for enterprise and for  politics. However, the government  
[193]
DID get involved when gains for business  and the economy could be made. For example,  
[197]
business leaders worked with Republican  politicians to expand markets overseas by  
[201]
means of diplomacy. Now this will come into focus  very clearly at the start of the next period,  
[205]
so here I’ll just mention a couple  of examples of how this played out.
[207]
First, laissez-faire capitalists strongly  supported the overthrow of the Hawaiian  
[211]
monarchy in 1893. Eventually that would lead to  the U.S. annexing the islands in 1898 and that  
[216]
meant new markets were opened. Second, was the  Open Door Policy established between China and  
[221]
the United States in 1899-1900. Essentially  it just advocated for equal trading rights  
[226]
in all the ports in China which were being  rapidly consumed by European powers. Again,  
[230]
we’ll get way more into that in  the next period, but for now,  
[232]
you just need to understand that during the  Gilded Age the government DID get involved  
[236]
in business when the outcome looked to be good  economically for them. However, the government  
[240]
almost never got involved in any meaningful  way when it came to regulating business.
[245]
OKay, that’s what you need to know about Unit  6 Topic 12 of the AP US History Curriculum.  
[248]
If you need help getting an A in your  class and a five on your exam in May,  
[251]
then you might want to click here and  let the invisible hand guide you towards  
[254]
my Ultimate Review Packet. If you want  me to keep making these videos for you,  
[257]
then the way you can let me know that is by  subscribing, and I shall oblige. Heimler out.