The Racial Wealth Gap and Banking (+ the USPS) | LET鈥橲 CONNECT - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
Not having money in this country, it's like聽 trying to swim in shark-infested waters with聽聽
[5]
weights on your ankles. It's hard to fix, it's聽 costly, and for generations of Black people,聽聽
[11]
it's been compounded by decades of racist聽 government policy. Let's take banking.聽聽
[18]
If you have enough money, your bank might dole聽 out travel points, offered lower fees for service,聽聽
[24]
or give you free checking. If you don't have聽 enough money, your bank can charge penalties for聽聽
[29]
keeping too little in your account, or fine you聽 for small infractions, like temporary overdrafts.聽聽
[35]
That's if you even have a bank. Thousands聽 of branches across the country are closing聽聽
[40]
in low-income areas, leaving people to rely聽 on costly alternatives, like payday lenders聽聽
[46]
and check-cashing services. And this isn't聽 like in Jaws when the shark eyes the lone聽聽
[51]
swimmer. 64 million Americans don't have access聽 to basic financial services. That's one in four聽聽
[59]
Americans trying to keep their heads above water.聽 So the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer,聽聽
[65]
and neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom聽 of night stays these couriers -- wait, what?聽聽
[72]
What does the USPS have to do with this? Well聽 let's connect banking to your local post office.
[83]
The post office may actually be one聽 solution for the millions of unbanked聽聽
[88]
or underbanked Americans in this country, and聽 by extension, help close the racial wealth gap.聽聽
[95]
But first, a look back at how we got to this聽 wealth gap. Rewind the tape, please, to slavery.聽聽
[102]
Beyond the violence and humiliation of slavery,聽 there's the fact that for 246 years Black people聽聽
[109]
couldn't own anything. When President Lincoln聽 signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863,聽聽
[117]
Black people owned only 0.5%聽 of the total wealth in America.聽聽
[122]
Then after the Civil War, powerful white聽 southerners wanted to keep their cotton mill聽聽
[127]
spinning with cheap labor so they said, "no way,"聽 to granting freed slaves 40 acres and a mule,聽聽
[133]
as promised by General Sherman and President聽 Lincoln. Instead, they'd allow Black people聽聽
[138]
to have a government-backed bank account, which聽 might have been helpful, except the bank collapsed聽聽
[144]
because of congressional mismanagement in 1874,聽 and the depositors lost nearly 3 million dollars.聽聽
[152]
Then came the Black codes enacted by southern聽 landowners to prevent Black people from voting,聽聽
[157]
trading, or testifying in court. And in 1896, we聽 have Plessy v. Ferguson, where the Supreme Court聽聽
[164]
blessed "separate but equal," which just opened聽 the floodgates of segregationist Jim Crow laws聽聽
[170]
and kept Black people from accessing hotels,聽 homes, hospitals, theaters, jobs and so much more.聽聽
[177]
Even in the rare cases where Black people聽 were able to amass wealth or power,聽聽
[181]
it was violently stripped away, either with聽 a complicit or apathetic government response,聽聽
[186]
as we saw in the 1898 Wilmington massacre,聽 and again in the 1921 Tulsa massacre.聽聽
[193]
And it's not just what the government actively did聽 to hold Black people back. It's what they didn't聽聽
[198]
do, too. President Franklin Roosevelt needed the聽 Senate's southern Democrats to pass the New Deal,聽聽
[204]
which was one of the most progressive social聽 welfare programs in history. To do that, though,聽聽
[209]
he left Black people out of the package.聽 Workers' protections were geared to jobs聽聽
[213]
that white people held, and government-backed聽 mortgage markets floated white people into the聽聽
[218]
suburbs and left Black people in the ghettos.聽 Even President Johnson's 1960s war on poverty聽聽
[223]
and Great Society programs were like offering聽 Advil for a tumor. They advocated charity and聽聽
[229]
education over a chance at prosperity and power聽 for Black people. There were job training programs聽聽
[236]
but no real job opportunities. By the time Richard聽 Nixon took office, with his war on crime vision,聽聽
[243]
the specter of the government facilitating聽 upward mobility became politically toxic. The new聽聽
[248]
rallying cry of conservatives in power was "law聽 and order," yet another axe swing on the wealth聽聽
[254]
and freedom of Black people. Law enforcement would聽 be the first line of defense in this new war,聽聽
[260]
surveilling and controlling mostly lower-income聽 Black and Brown communities. Black people were聽聽
[265]
told to invest in their own communities, in their聽 own Black banks, and Black-owned businesses.聽聽
[270]
But what this amounted to was a segregated and聽 unequal system without mainstream infrastructure聽聽
[276]
and support. Today, a third of Black families聽 report having no wealth or assets at all, and the聽聽
[283]
Black community owns less than 2 percent of wealth聽 in the US, up just 1.5 percent since slavery.
[292]
And again, banks have closed branches聽 all over the country in low-income areas,聽聽
[297]
creating these banking deserts. And without聽 banks, the sharks move in. The sharks from the聽聽
[303]
earlier metaphor, but now I guess they're desert聽 sharks. Anyway, you can't save your money when you聽聽
[308]
don't have a place to save it, and you can't pay聽 your bills without a way to cash your paycheck,聽聽
[313]
so you're left with costly alternatives that聽 charge absurd interest and penalties. Over the聽聽
[319]
course of a 30-year working career, these services聽 can cost more than $86,000, in fees which is twice聽聽
[328]
the annual income for the average Black family.聽 Now, if only there was an institution represented聽聽
[333]
in every zip code that could already,聽 by law, offer basic financial services.聽聽
[339]
And that's our connection to the post office.聽 Under current law, a post office could immediately聽聽
[346]
offer electronic money transfers, check聽 cashing, bill payment, prepaid cards, and ATMs.聽聽
[354]
In fact, they've already provided these services聽 in the past. From 1911 to 1967, the US had postal聽聽
[362]
banking. The postal service offered savings聽 accounts, and by 1934, the postal bank had 1.2聽聽
[369]
billion dollars in assets or about 10% of聽 the entire banking system. But in the 1960s,聽聽
[375]
a drop in deposits collapsed the program.聽 And the post office has one other advantage:聽聽
[382]
trust. People trust their local post office.聽 It's familiar. It's personal. And trust is big聽聽
[388]
when history has already seated mistrust聽 in government-backed financial services,聽聽
[393]
like the first Black bank. Now, if anyone says,聽 "we can't give the post office more to do,聽聽
[399]
when they can barely deliver聽 mail and are running a deficit,"聽聽
[402]
here's the reply: the postal service just helped聽 deliver a safe and secure election by delivering聽聽
[408]
millions of mail-in ballots in the middle of a聽 pandemic. On top of their regular duties. And聽聽
[414]
the post office was actually completely聽 self-funded until a 2006 law required it聽聽
[419]
to pre-fund its retirement liabilities for 75聽 years into the future. In fact, postal banking聽聽
[427]
would actually help the post office out of its聽 current deficit. The postal service estimates聽聽
[432]
that offering banking services could actually add聽 eight to ten billion dollars in revenue a year.聽聽
[440]
And there we have our connection, the post office聽 and banking. The post office alone can't keep聽聽
[446]
people out of the shark-infested waters of聽 poverty, but it's one thing the government聽聽
[451]
can do right now without Congress, without any聽 new laws. It's a lifesaver, and that's a start.聽聽
[460]
On the next episode of Let's Connect, we're聽 going to share actions you can take right now聽聽
[465]
to help make postal banking a reality. Be sure聽 to connect with us by subscribing to our channel,聽聽
[471]
and we'll fight for economic justice together.