馃攳
Spousal Benefits as the Laws Exist Now - YouTube
Channel: unknown
[8]
Okay, let's talk about spousal benefits and again
[13]
first I'm going to do the part that hasn't
changed, then I'm gonna do the change,
[17]
then I'm gonna do the transition period. So the part
that hasn't changed is your basic
[22]
spousal benefit. So PIA, when it says
"John's PIA," PIA is "primary insurance amount."
[30]
Which is the amount that he would be
entitled to at age 66. Alright so let's
[36]
assume that John is 66 and assume his
wife Jane is 66. And his primary insurance amount
[43]
is $2,000 based on his earnings
record and let's also assume Jane worked,
[50]
but she didn't work as many years and
she didn't work for as high a salary,
[54]
and her primary insurance amount is $800.
Alright and let's assume under existing
[64]
law and potentially grandfathered in the
new law, John applies for social
[70]
security. We'll talk about suspending later, but he either applies and suspends,
[77]
or he just applies. Jane would be
entitled to a spousal benefit that would
[86]
end up being one half of his benefit
when he was 66 years old.
[93]
Alright so she can get $1000 a month and even
though on her record it would be $800 a month.
[102]
In addition her record, let's say she never worked,
and her primary insurance amount is $0.
She could still get $1,000 a month.
[112]
ok all right
[116]
That is called your basic spousal benefit,
which has not changed.
[124]
Alright nown in order for that to
happen the primary worker, in this case
[131]
John, he had to have filed for benefits.
[136]
He couldn't when he was aged 66 he
couldn't just sit on the spot and do
[141]
nothing and then his wife files for the spousal benefit. He would actually have to
[147]
file for a spousal benefit. Alright, she
his wife, and by the way of using the old
[154]
sexist paradigm where the husband was
the primary, and I apologize for that but
[159]
it's just easier to communicate, let's
assume that he was 66, she could actually
[167]
for a spousal benefit at age 62, but if she did
that she would have to suffer an actuarial reduction
[179]
wouldn't be able to get 50%, she might
get only 35%. And as you'll see there's some other
[186]
problems with her filing early. This is
strategy now and it might change a little
[192]
bit but at least under the existing and old law in
almost all cases, one of the primary
[198]
insurance worker or a person with a
stronger social security record to work
[203]
until age 70. And you'll see why. But
anyway the spousal benefits are based
[211]
on the primary worker's primary insurance
amount and which is the amount he would be
[217]
receiving at 66. Okay now the other thing
is divorce. Let's say
[231]
you were in your marriage, and the husband,
again using the sexist paradigm, the husband was the primary earner and he had a big earnings record and the spouse did not.
[246]
Let's say you were married for 10 years or longer. You would then still be able to file for a spousal benefit,
[255]
even though you are divorced. And you can do that if you are unmarried and,
[266]
if you're at least 62 years old, but it gets more fun than that. You can have more than one ex-spouse collecting on one's
[280]
spouse's record. So let's say you were
thirty years old, you had a good job and
[289]
good earnings record, he got married -
[291]
actually you can get married at 20 -
the marriage last 10 years, it doesn't work, get divorced,
[299]
marry somebody else. That will last 10
years. And now we're from 20 to
[304]
30 for the first one, 30 to 40
for the next. Then you have to keep
[309]
paying for these divorces, so you're still
working. And you marry somebody else
[313]
that goes from 40 to 50 and you marry somebody else that goes from 50 to 60.
[319]
Then you divorce that person and marry somebody else
and that one goes from 60 to 70. So what do we have, 5 marriages there?
[327]
Assuming they didn't get remarried, all five of your
ex-spouses can all the spousal benefit on
[337]
the one person who is still working.
[340]
Is this a great country, or what?
[345]
Alright, now we're going to find out coming
up this what's to be the change. In the existing law,
[355]
you didn't even have to tell your ex-spouse that you were collecting on them. And your ex-spouse couldn't do anything to stop you. So we had
[370]
some very interesting strategies and here
was really nice strategy, this is kind
[376]
of a precursor to the apply and suspend. Let's say that because you were divorced
[381]
you have to go back to work and you have
your own earnings record. But you were able to
[387]
take advantage of a spousal benefits
from ex-husband. But the way this is also
[395]
true even if you weren't divorced. Let's just stay with divorce for a moment...you'll still get those raises, not withstanding the fact
[410]
you're collecting money from your
ex-spouse. So you're still getting your
[418]
raises, but you're also getting a check. You're gonna see the change in the law is, but divorce planning for
[429]
social security - a lot of people don't even know that. And you can't make it up, you can't discover, "Oh geez, for the last three years
[438]
I could be collecting social security from my spouse, I'm going to ask for those three years back."
[445]
You can't do that.
[454]
When you're born becomes really
important...now, we're going to talk about
[458]
the still existing law. If you're born before December 31st, 1953 which means you'll be 62
[469]
or older in 2015, you will be allowed to file a
restricted application (we'll talk about what that is)
and it doesn't matter if
[485]
the primary worker filed or if he didn't. If the divorce
has occurred no more than two years earlier. That'll hopefully
[496]
become more clear as I keep going. First thing to know is that there are some interesting rules for divorce and there are changed in the divorce area.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





