This Guy Accidently Admitted That He Created Bitcoin - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[4]
One of the biggest mysteries and most well kept secrets of all time is the true identity
[9]
of the creator of Bitcoin.
[11]
With an alias of Satoshi Nakamoto, the founder of Bitcoin was able to create an asset whose
[16]
market cap peaked at over $1 trillion.
[20]
If Bitcoin was a company, it’s market cap would have been the 6th largest in the world
[24]
at its peak.
[25]
Yet, somehow, the founder has been able to keep his identity anonymous.
[29]
But, if we look closer, we’ll see that Satoshi actually left quite a bit of bread crumbs
[34]
for us.
[35]
And, one guy even accidentally admitted for a brief second that he created bitcoin.
[39]
So, here are the top contenders for founder of bitcoin, and why the last contender may
[44]
even be Satoshi himself.
[47]
Before we get into the candidates, let’s first discuss why Satoshi has chosen to stay
[51]
anonymous.
[52]
We have seen theories that Satoshi is a private person who doesn’t like attention or that
[57]
Satoshi has a criminal background and doesn’t want to attract the attention of authorities.
[61]
But, in reality, none of these are likely the real reason.
[65]
If you take a look at the premise of Bitcoin and comments from Satoshi, the reason for
[69]
his anonymity is clear.
[72]
In 2011, Satoshi wrote quote “The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust
[77]
that’s required to make it work.”
[78]
So, one of the primary reasons bitcoin was created was to prevent users from having to
[83]
trust a central authority or figure head.
[86]
If Satoshi’s identity was revealed, people would look to him for his thoughts on crypto
[90]
and they would look to him to fix any issues.
[92]
But this would be contradictory to the goal of Bitcoin.
[95]
In a decentralized system, one person should not be able to move the markets, and trust
[99]
has to come from the community, not the creator.
[102]
So, that’s why the creator of bitcoin avoids the spotlight.
[105]
With that being said though, amongst the crypto community, the real Satoshi is likely quite
[110]
well known already.
[112]
He or she is likely one the most respected voices in the community.
[116]
This is because Bitcoin was not some random basement success like many might think.
[120]
In the first few years after Bitcoin went live, Satoshi was actually extremely talkative.
[125]
In fact, he made 575 posts between November 2009 and December 2010.
[131]
These posts primarily discussed problems with bitcoin and troubleshooting of various issues
[135]
with the help of the community.
[137]
Satoshi didn’t leave the community until he felt that Bitcoin was ready stating quote
[141]
“I’ve moved on to other things.
[143]
It’s in good hands with Gavin and everyone.”
[146]
Considering Satoshi’s willingness to discuss Bitcoin with the community after the launch
[149]
of Bitcoin, it’s highly likely that Satoshi was discussing with the crypto community even
[154]
before he created his alias.
[156]
So, if his identity was revealed one day, the general public would probably have no
[160]
clue who it is, but the people super involved in the crypto space wouldn’t really be surprised.
[166]
With that being said, let’s jump into our first candidate which is of course Satoshi
[170]
Nakamoto himself.
[171]
The first instinct you have when trying to find the creator of bitcoin is to actually
[175]
find someone who’s name is actually Satoshi Nakamoto.
[178]
And sure enough, the media was able to find a man named Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto.
[183]
But aside from having the same name and being an engineer, this guy basically has no connection
[187]
to the crypto space.
[189]
He told the Associated Press “I got nothing to do with it.”
[193]
And considering that it would be stupid to use your real name if you wanted to be anonymous,
[197]
I think we’d all agree that he’s telling the truth.
[199]
Moving on, we have Elon Musk.
[202]
Again, this one is an oddball.
[204]
Though Elon is extremely talented and has the background to create such a project, it’s
[208]
highly unlikely that it was Elon Musk.
[211]
During the creation of Bitcoin, Elon Musk had just burnt his entire Paypal fortune on
[215]
Tesla and SpaceX, and he was in debt just trying to get by.
[218]
So, I don’t think he was spending his free time, which he didn’t even have, coding
[223]
Bitcoin.
[224]
Next up, we have Craig Wright.
[226]
There’s also very little evidence suggesting that Craig Wright is indeed Satoshi other
[230]
than the fact that he himself keeps claiming that he is Satoshi.
[234]
Since 2016, Craig has been claiming that he was part of the main team who created Bitcoin.
[239]
Considering the philosophy of the real Satoshi, however, he would have likely never come forward
[243]
about being the founder of Bitcoin.
[246]
Along with Craig we also have Dave Kleiman.
[248]
Dave unfortunately died in 2013 and he never claimed to have created Bitcoin.
[253]
The only reason Dave is on this list is because Craig claims that Dave was part of the team,
[258]
but given that Craig has low credibility, no one really believes this story.
[262]
Dave was on Satoshi’s original mailing list, but it seems like Craig is just leveraging
[266]
this connection to push his own narrative.
[268]
Anyway, with all of those loose cannons out of the way, we can move onto strong candidates
[272]
starting with Bram Cohen.
[274]
Bram is one of the veterans of the peer to peer model having co-founded BitTorrent way
[278]
back in 2004.
[280]
He was a prolific blogger who posted about his thoughts on peer to peer networks, security
[284]
protocols, and decentralized systems.
[287]
Coincidently his blogging even slowed down during the launch of Bitcoin.
[290]
Bram was actually a super strong candidate for founding bitcoin, but one of his later
[294]
actions would disprove this theory.
[296]
Bram would eventually go on to make his own cryptocurrency called Chia, and Chia is supposed
[301]
to be the antithesis to Bicoin and the proof of work model used by bitcoin.
[305]
I think we’d agree that it’s highly unlikely that Satoshi would not only trash on bitcoin,
[309]
but also create a competing crypto.
[311]
Moving on, we have Gavin Anderson.
[314]
Gavin Anderson is a software developer who was very much involved in the early days of
[318]
bitcoin.
[319]
If you guys remember the last statement from Satoshi, he said that Bitcoin is in good hands
[323]
with Gavin and everyone else.
[325]
It’s possible that Satoshi was transferring the reins to himself.
[329]
A stylometry study even found that Satoshi’s writing was most similar to that of Gavin
[333]
Anderson.
[334]
An incident that raised some skepticism about this theory was in 2016 when Gavin believed
[338]
that Craig Wright was the creator of Bitcoin.
[341]
Though that seems a bit sketchy, maybe that was just a 200 iq play.
[345]
It’s possible that he saw Craig take credit for founding Bitcoin and he went along with
[349]
the story to shift attention away from himself.
[352]
There isn't really any glaring evidence that Gavin isn’t Satoshi.
[355]
The only reason I don’t think it’s Gavin is because the last two people on this list
[359]
are even more convincing candidates starting with Hal Finney.
[362]
Hal Finney graduated with a computer science degree from CalTech in 1979.
[367]
While completing his bachelors, he often took graduate level classes which really showcases
[371]
his high intelligence.
[373]
Hal Finney was also the first person to respond to Satoshi's original email about Bitcoin,
[378]
and Hal Finney would become the first person to connect to Satoshi’s network and the
[381]
first to receive Bitcoin.
[383]
Whenever you create a YouTube channel, you’re often your first subscriber.
[387]
And whenever you create a business, you’re often your first customer.
[390]
So, it could make sense that Hal Finney was the first to test the network and receive
[394]
bitcoin.
[395]
Aside from having the brains to create such a project, Hal Finney has a rather direct
[399]
connection to the name Satoshi Nakamoto.
[401]
Remember the first guy that we discussed whose name was Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto?
[405]
Well, he definitely wasn’t the creator, but he may have very well been the face of
[410]
Bitcoin.
[411]
You see, Dorian lived just two blocks away from Hal Finney.
[413]
Maybe, Hal Finney used the name of his neighbor to cover up his real identity.
[417]
Something else that fits the story is that Hal Finney was diagnosed with ALS in 2009
[422]
and unfortunately died in 2014.
[424]
This may be the reason that Satoshi Nakamoto stopped posting in 2011 and why we haven’t
[429]
heard from him since.
[430]
The only problem in this story is that I’m not sure Satoshi would have made himself so
[434]
obvious.
[435]
Would he have really made himself the first recipient of bitcoin and was he really emailing
[439]
himself?
[440]
I’m not sure.
[441]
A lot of the crypto community actually thinks that Hal Finney is indeed the creator of bitcoin,
[445]
and I wouldn’t be surprised if it really was him.
[450]
But I do think one man is an even likelier candidate, and that’s of course Nick Szabo.
[456]
Most of you guys likely aren’t familiar with Nick Szabo, but he was one of the first
[460]
people in the crypto space if not the first.
[462]
Nick proposed the idea of a digital currency way back in 1998 with the name Bit Gold.
[468]
The idea for Bit Gold was basically identical to Bitcoin.
[472]
Bit Gold relied on a network of decentralized miners to verify transactions and keep the
[476]
system secure.
[477]
Nick Szabo never ended up launching Bit Gold because he wasn’t able to work through a
[481]
handful of security risks.
[483]
But that doesn’t mean that he ever stopped trying.
[484]
In a 2005 blog post, Nick actually outlines how an unforgeable chain or the blockchain
[490]
was the solution to his problems with Bit Gold.
[493]
In this post, Nick also explains how the entirety of the Bit gold system would work from mining
[497]
to transactions to the blockchain.
[499]
What’s extremely surprising is that despite spending 7 years figuring all of this out,
[504]
Nick didn’t end up launching Bit Gold.
[506]
What’s even more fishy is that he tried to make it seem like he made this blog post
[510]
after Bitcoin was revealed.
[511]
If you take a look at the publication date of this blog post, it says December 27, 2008
[516]
at the top.
[517]
But if we use the wayback machine, we can see that a snapshot of the website was taken
[521]
in 2006 which showcases that the original date of publication was December 29, 2005.
[527]
Internet detectives also confirmed that there was actually no change to the post itself
[531]
except for the displayed date of publication.
[534]
Aside from outlining the entirety of bitcoin before it actually came out, Nick Szabo was
[538]
the only crypto enthusiast who never communicated with Satoshi Nakamoto.
[541]
As we previously discussed, Satoshi Nakamoto had communicated with Gavin Anderson and Hal
[546]
Finney, but he never communicated with Nick Szabo despite Nick being one of the veterans
[550]
of the space.
[551]
The initials of Satoshi Nakamoto are also the same as Nick Szabo.
[555]
In Japan, when you write initials, you write the last name first, meaning that Satoshi’s
[560]
initials are NS not SN. Satoshi even commented on how his bitcoin address started with his
[565]
initials, and sure enough, his bitcoin address starts with NS not SN.
[571]
Around the time Bitcoin came out, Nick’s blogging also fell off a cliff.
[574]
Between 2005 and 2008, he was averaging 40 posts every single month.
[580]
Since 2009, however, his posting has dwindled to 30 to 40 posts per year.
[585]
Something else to consider is that Nick even had a copyright on the idea for Bit Gold.
[589]
Yet, despite Bitcoin being basically a ripoff of Bit Gold, Nick never took any legal action
[594]
against Bitcoin.
[595]
I think it’s safe to assume that if you spent 10 years developing Bit gold and some
[599]
Japanese dude with no posting history in the community comes along and rips off your work,
[603]
you would almost definitely pursue legal action.
[606]
Satoshi even admitted that Bitcoin is an implementation of Wei Dai’s b-money proposal and Nick Szabo’s
[610]
Bitgold proposal.
[611]
I mean, this seems like the perfect opportunity to sue.
[615]
Another coincidence is that Nick’s birthday and Satoshi’s birthday are both April 6.
[619]
But, by far the strongest piece of evidence is a potential Freudian slip from Nick.
[624]
A Freudian slip is an unintentional error that reveals a person’s subconscious thoughts.
[629]
These are especially common when a person is trying to suppress a thought.
[631]
For instance, if I told you not to think about dolphins, the first thing you’ll think about
[636]
is dolphins.
[637]
Every time you try to not think about dolphins, you’ll end up thinking about dolphins.
[642]
The same idea applies here with Nick Szabo.
[645]
In an interview with Tim Feriss in 2017, Nick accidently says that he designed bitcoin and
[649]
then quickly corrects himself.
[653]
Evidently, Nick may very well be the Satoshi Nakamoto.
[660]
Even if he isn’t though, he’s still no doubt the father of bitcoin as he developed
[664]
Bitgold years before Bitcoin ever saw the light of day.
[667]
Do you guys think Nick Szabo is the creator of Bitcoin?
[671]
Comment that down below.
[672]
Also, drop a like if you guys found this video fascinating.
[676]
And of course, consider joining our discord community to suggest future video ideas and
[679]
consider subscribing to see more questions logically answered.