馃攳
ESG: Woke to Broke - YouTube
Channel: PragerU
[1]
Why do millions of people聽
invest in retirement accounts?
[5]
The answer is obvious: to have money to聽
live on when they're no longer working.
[9]
The best way for those accounts to grow is聽
to invest in companies that make a profit.聽聽
[14]
Less profit for those companies聽
means less money for retirement.
[18]
This might seem like common sense聽
but it's becoming less common,聽聽
[23]
thanks to a new investment strategy called聽
ESG. ESG stands for Environmental, Social,聽聽
[30]
and Governance. If you're wondering聽
what that means, you're not alone.
[34]
Generally, it means that a company's first concern聽
should no longer be how much money it makes,聽聽
[39]
but rather how much social good it does.聽
In other words, get woke, or get shamed.
[46]
If you're an oil company, for聽
example, you're out of luck聽聽
[49]
because, by the nature of your business,聽
it's assumed you're destroying the planet.聽聽
[53]
Never mind that you're powering homes聽
and hospitals. That doesn't count.
[57]
In fact, if you're a company just trying聽
to make a profit, you're the problem.
[62]
ESG proponent Klaus Schwab, chairman of聽
the World Economic Forum, puts it this way:聽聽
[67]
"We can't continue with an economic system driven聽
by selfish values, such as short-term profit..."
[74]
The message is clear: we need聽
ESG to save us from ourselves.
[78]
Really?
[79]
The pursuit of profits has聽
fueled many of mankind's聽聽
[82]
greatest innovations and greatest companies.
[84]
It led Elon Musk to build electric cars,聽
Andy Grove to design computer chips,聽聽
[90]
and Reed Hastings to develop the聽
world's most popular streaming service.
[94]
Everything from aspirin to聽
commercial airplanes, to yes,聽聽
[97]
solar panels and wind turbines came聽
about because of the desire for profit.
[103]
Profit is why you have a聽
job, clothes, a house, food,聽聽
[106]
and every other necessity,聽
not to mention luxuries.
[110]
It's the reason why you can live in Phoenix and聽
stay cool, or live in Buffalo and stay warm.
[115]
The genius of capitalism is that it requires聽聽
[118]
businesses to do good things聽
for society to make a profit.
[123]
Think about it:
[123]
If you want to start a business鈥攚hether聽
it's a dog hotel or a shoe factory鈥攜ou'll聽聽
[128]
have to create a product or service that聽
helps others鈥攁t a price they can afford.
[134]
If you want to hire employees,聽
you'll have to offer attractive聽聽
[136]
wages and safe working conditions.聽
Otherwise, nobody will work for you.
[141]
If you want customers, not only will you have to聽
make a good product, but you'll need to cultivate聽聽
[146]
a good reputation. That means treating those聽
customers well and offering competitive prices.
[152]
In a free enterprise system, you can't聽
make money without providing a social good.聽聽
[157]
Capitalism is, by its very nature, conscientious.
[162]
It turns out, then, that profit isn't selfish鈥攊t聽聽
[164]
motivates us to contribute聽
our talents to help others.
[168]
ESG threatens this system. By denigrating profit,聽聽
[172]
it lessens the incentive and the聽
means to do good. Without profits,聽聽
[177]
companies won't have the capital to provide聽
jobs, pay investors, or fund innovation.
[182]
But that's the world ESG wants you to live聽
in: a world where profit takes second place聽聽
[188]
to a preoccupation with income inequality, race聽
and gender sensitivity, and climate alarmism.
[195]
But even if you wanted to address those聽
concerns, how would ESG help you do it?
[200]
That's a fair question because聽
there's no consensus on ESG standards.
[204]
Here's a good example:
[205]
Three self-proclaimed ESG聽
watchdogs have given Tesla聽聽
[210]
three completely different聽
ratings: best, worst, and middling.
[214]
In capitalism, there is a simple metric to聽
determine success: how much money you're making.
[221]
Under ESG, there is no such聽
thing. It's a judgment call.
[226]
To make ESG investment聽
strategies even more problematic,聽聽
[230]
according to Meir Statman, professor聽
of finance at Santa Clara University,聽聽
[234]
"in the long run, ESG investors are likely to earn聽
lower after-fee returns than non-ESG investors."聽聽
[242]
Over a period of say, 30 years, those fees alone聽
could cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars.
[248]
So, if ESG endangers profits, offers no clear聽
metric for success, and is a mediocre investment,聽聽
[256]
why is it even a "thing?"
[258]
For two main reasons:
[259]
First, ESG allows people like Larry Fink, CEO of聽
BlackRock, the world's largest investment company,聽聽
[266]
to feel good about themselves. It's a "get out聽
of jail free" card for "guilty" billionaires.聽聽
[271]
They preen in the New York Times鈥攁nd聽
the rest of us are stuck with the bill.聽
[275]
And second, it's about control.
[278]
ESG enables an "enlightened" elite to tell聽
everyone else how to run their companies.聽聽
[283]
Submit to ESG or you won't get聽
that loan or that investment,聽聽
[286]
whether or not it's good for your聽
bottom line and your shareholders.聽聽聽
[290]
That's how companies and whole聽
economies go from woke to broke.
[295]
Including your 401k.聽
[297]
So, if somebody tries to sell you on聽
Environmental, Social, and Governance investing,聽聽
[302]
hold on tight to your wallet and to your values.
[305]
ESG is coming for both.聽
[308]
I鈥檓 Andy Puzder, Senior Fellow at the School聽
of Public Policy at Pepperdine University,聽聽
[313]
for Prager University.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





