Koopkrachtstijging - Zondag met Lubach (S09) - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[3]
Well now, I've got good news and bad news.
[7]
First the good news.
[8]
Most people's purchasing power will increase by one and a half percent next year.
[12]
Such nice figures ahead!
[16]
The cabinet's plans reveal that purchasing power will increase by one and a half percent.
[22]
But before we all head for the whores in a fit of euphoria...
[25]
There's also-- That's how we are.
[28]
There's also bad news, which is that it's total bullshit.
[32]
Because purchasing power is a complicated term...
[35]
So I'm about to explain it using, let's see...
[38]
Here, a cup of tea...
[39]
There, a saucer to go with it...
[42]
See, it goes like this.
[43]
Purchasing power is how much you can buy after you've paid your taxes.
[48]
So, when taxes go up, the purchasing power goes down.
[51]
And when things get more expensive, like groceries, the purchasing power goes down too.
[55]
But when you start making more money, the purchasing power goes up.
[57]
Simple enough. Right?
[60]
Yeah. I don't get what the cup of tea's for.
[62]
But you would say that what Rob Trip tells us here is good news.
[66]
Most people's purchasing power will increase by one and a half percent next year.
[70]
Yeah, and that Rob Trip tells us this now, that's because of this.
[73]
So we took a compass and a ruler and we had a look:
[77]
How will we arrange it so that the increase in purchasing power...
[80]
...will hit as many people in such a balanced fashion as possible?
[84]
Yeah, "in such a balanced fashion as possible".
[86]
Sounds like Rico Verhoeven on a unicycle.
[91]
But what Wopke here means is that all Dutch people should profit about equally.
[97]
So all the retirees, the working people...
[99]
...the welfare-empowered people, the charismatic VPRO-presenters...
[102]
...should all experience equal forward progress.
[107]
And Wopke's story sounds real neat, but something doesn't "wop" up here.
[110]
First of all...
[113]
Rob Trip says that most people will experience a one-and-a-half percent increase in purchasing power...
[117]
...but that doesn't happen in practice.
[119]
That one and a half percent is extrapolated from cabinet plans.
[123]
But other factors in your life have a much larger influence on your purchasing power.
[127]
When you leave your parents' home, when you get a child...
[129]
...or you suddenly get sponsored by a large animal feed company...
[132]
...your purchasing power will go every which way.
[137]
But in a prediction about the purchasing power used for policy plans...
[140]
...they, of course, cannot account for that.
[141]
That's why the Central Planning Bureau, the CPB, assumes that...
[145]
...whoever they're calculating their purchasing power for does squat.
[149]
"They do not change jobs, do not receive a promotion, do not become unemployed or unfit for work, do not marry or divorce, nor even get older."
[158]
Doesn't even get older...?
[161]
That only goes for me and Pino. (TL Note: Pino is the Dutch version of Sesame Street's Big Bird.)
[165]
We get a new picture made each year.
[168]
Oh, Pien and I...
[171]
But that purchasing power prediction doesn't have much to do with reality, as it turns out.
[174]
Because you might be happily celebrating Rob Trip's good news from the comfort of your couch...
[178]
...but when your dishwasher breaks because your toddler decided the guinea pig also needs a good cleaning...
[182]
...then that'll have a much greater influence on your wallet.
[186]
So that increase in purchasing power isn't about you...
[189]
...but about the median. Let me explain.
[193]
If you put the entire population of the Netherlands in a row...
[195]
...by order of how much their purchasing power goes up, you'll be working on that for days.
[203]
I once got 30 people to play along, but it was utter chaos.
[206]
Couple pro tips: Arrange plenty of bathrooms. Including for the ladies.
[209]
Plenty of coffee and maybe a few traffic controllers.
[212]
But once you've succeeded in that and everyone is standing in order of their increase in purchasing power...
[216]
...then the middlemost person of all those people is the median.
[221]
And that middlemost person, THAT's the one who gets a one-and-a-half percent increase according to current cabinet plans.
[226]
So in theory, one half will get less of an increase, and the other half gets even more.
[230]
But even THAT isn't what truly happens.
[233]
Because let's get back to Rob Trip, who confidently tells us...
[236]
...the purchasing power WILL increase, but that's absolutely not certain.
[239]
It's just a prediction. And those don't always come true. Watch.
[242]
This is what the Journaal said in 2016.
[245]
"We'll get a little more to spend, about one percent on average."
[248]
"Nine in ten Dutch people will experience a purchasing power increase in the coming year."
[253]
Yeah, the purchasing power would increase for the vast majority of Dutch people.
[256]
But this is what happened:
[257]
"Purchasing power shrunk for nearly half of Dutch people in 2017."
[262]
The past ten years, every Prinsjesdag-prediction by the CPB hasn't come true even once.
[268]
And that's not only because the life of ONE individual with a broken dishwasher and a clean guinea pig...
[272]
...cannot be predicted, but also because our whole country experiences big changes.
[277]
Because if the price of oil increases, purchasing power goes down.
[280]
Or when wages increase, the purchasing power goes up.
[283]
A certain brand of animal feed goes out of fashion? Purchasing power down.
[287]
"God damn it, fuck!" Calm down, calm down.
[290]
Uncalled for.
[292]
Where was I? Oh, right.
[293]
So that one-and-a-half percent purchasing power increase is a prediction about ONE person...
[297]
...for whom everything stays the same, who never ages a day, and who lives in a country where nothing ever changes.
[303]
But why is everybody always talking about that purchasing power, then?
[306]
Well, the government wants to paint a pretty picture.
[310]
That's why they have the purchasing power be predicted based on their plans for the coming year.
[315]
And not only for that one median, but for every income group.
[319]
Then the government gets figures like these back from the CPB, for instance.
[323]
Look, these little heads...
[324]
These are the various groups and their respective purchasing power increase.
[326]
You've got the elderly, the unemployed, independent entrepreneurs, millionaires.
[330]
Then you see that this one, for instance, gets a 0.7 percent increase...
[333]
And this one a 1.4 percent increase.
[335]
And let's imagine that what you see here...
[337]
...is the result of the government plans.
[340]
So the current coalition thinks this is best for the Netherlands.
[344]
But they also know: If they present this as it is to the public...
[347]
...everyone will say, "That's not fair!"
[350]
"Cause, see, this group here gets much less than this group!"
[353]
And then the government quickly goes and adjusts all manner of dials.
[357]
Because remember what the minister said?
[359]
So we took a compass and a ruler and we had a look:
[362]
How will we arrange it so that the increase in purchasing power...
[365]
...will hit as many people in such a balanced fashion as possible?
[368]
Exactly.
[369]
They start making little tweaks to taxes and returns until something nice pops out.
[373]
And then we get something like this.
[375]
Let's say that taxation on dogs decreases a little.
[378]
That's good for this head here.
[380]
But by tweaking that, another group experiences a downturn.
[383]
Ouch. The elderly.
[384]
Well, let's funnel some money into the social security system.
[386]
Yay, the elderly!
[387]
But yeah, then another group experiences a downturn: The millionaires.
[389]
Shit, the champagne! That kinda thing.
[392]
And they keep adjusting these dials...
[395]
...until everybody gets a sufficient increase, so that they can say...
[400]
"Hey, everybody will benefit!"
[402]
And you might think: "But what's so bad about that?"
[405]
"It's good that everyone gets about an equal increase?"
[408]
But because of all the messing with those plans...
[410]
...just for a few tenths of a percent difference, that has a flip side.
[417]
Yeah, this is Barbara Baarsma, professor in economy.
[421]
She can explain in exact terms what the government does, and why that's unwise.
[425]
So you know what? Let's tweak a little.
[427]
Extremely expensive policy, very ad hoc, super short-term...
[430]
...doesn't do anything for the long-term growth of this economy.
[434]
Alright. What I noticed was, she doesn't use her tea either!
[439]
Important.
[440]
And what she says is, the government pulls out all the stops...
[443]
...to give a last-minute boost in purchasing power to certain groups...
[446]
...for a few tenths of a percent difference.
[449]
So that adjusting of those dials, all that messing around with taxes, that's not at all beneficial.
[454]
This year, they screwed around with about 700 million euros in this manner.
[458]
And in 2016, it was even 1.1 billion!
[462]
Those are giant, vision-free investments, purely for a positive Prinsjesdag image.
[469]
Another big disadvantage, our tax system is only getting more complicated.
[472]
The director of the CPB, which calculates the purchasing power figures, even says so.
[476]
The fact is, our tax- and premium system...
[478]
...and subsidy system, the way it looks as complex as it does now...
[483]
...that might in part be because of that whole fine-tuning of those figures.
[488]
And that's something people don't always like very much.
[490]
No, that's something people don't always like very much.
[493]
I stopped paying taxes about ten years ago, myself...
[496]
...purely because I think it's too complicated.
[498]
No worries, the government knows that about me...
[500]
...they just go like this.
[502]
Because I might move abroad otherwise.
[507]
Measuring the purchasing power is not strictly nonsense.
[510]
It gives a certain image of how the policy might roughly affect various groups.
[515]
But that fake precision and those rash adjustments, that's pointless.
[520]
The cabinet only does that because the media is crazy about it.
[523]
Because the Journaal cheerfully opens up with the good news that the purchasing power will go up.
[527]
And it gets even worse.
[529]
Because what do you do if you really wanna get how it all works, Jeroen Overbeek?
[532]
Yeah, we'll talk to political reporter Ron Fresen.
[534]
Exactly. And what does that result in?
[539]
That results in the fact that the purchasing power figure we can report now...
[542]
...one-and-a-half percent increase for everybody.
[545]
That that's better than the figure we got back in August.
[549]
There's so much going wrong in that sentence, and then we're not even talking about the word order.
[554]
"Average." "Everybody." That can't be right, then.
[557]
Luckily we still have talk shows.
[559]
Margriet van der Linden had the Minister of Finance as a guest...
[561]
...so she had the opportunity to really put him through the wringer.
[563]
The good news is that almost everyone, really virtually everyone, will notice this increase in the purchasing power.
[569]
But this sounds a little like, as I mentioned before, like the good news show.
[573]
Because that's how this seems to work, just about.
[575]
On the other hand, something like the VAT goes up, which has people saying,
[578]
"Yeah, we'll feel that one."
[580]
Because groceries, things you spend money on, VAT goes up, so how will this benefit us?
[585]
No, M, more VAT and things getting more expensive is already accounted for in the purchasing power.
[591]
That's the whole idea of purchasing power. Otherwise, it'd just be money.
[596]
So when the interviewer says something like that, the minister thinks, "This'll be a cinch."
[601]
You can even see it in the look in Hoekstra's eyes when she starts talking about groceries.
[605]
..."Yeah, we'll feel that one." Because groceries, things you spend money on...
[618]
"Okayyy, she doesn't know what she's talking about. Chill. Okay."
[623]
"Relax, Wopke."
[629]
And they go really far to keep the positive image in place.
[632]
Because see, last week, on September 13, CBS announced the news...
[636]
...that the purchasing power actually reduced for about half the Netherlands' population.
[640]
So that was bad news!
[641]
Because a beaming minister told us a year earlier that it was going to rise!
[645]
So what also happens on September 13?
[647]
On the day that bad news came out?
[650]
Exactly on that day, the new predictions coincidentally get leaked.
[655]
And that gets the NOS so excited that they promptly forget about the bad news...
[658]
...dash to the Binnenhof and shout:
[660]
Mister Wiebes. --Yes? It sure looks great, those figures!
[663]
Ooh, it sure looks great, those figures!
[667]
Yay, mission accomplished! 700 million spent on a pretty NOS broadcast.
[671]
The tax system has been a massive, addled mess for years...
[674]
...but you also provided this FICTIONAL middlemost family with a theoretical benefit...
[678]
...of a few percent points of a theoretically expected increase in purchasing power...
[682]
...provided they don't age, the animal feed doesn't get any more expensive...
[684]
...and the toddler stuffs the guinea pig in the cutlery drawer, as it ought to be.
[688]
There. Phew, I'm parched.
[690]
Ah-hah! The tea!