The three criteria for direct participation in hostilities - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
[Music]
[2]
we know that civilians are protected
[5]
against attacks however they may lose
[8]
their protection when they directly take
[10]
part in austerities according to the
[14]
ICRC three elements must be fulfilled in
[17]
order to conclude that a civilian has
[18]
directly taken part in austerities the
[22]
first element is that the action of the
[24]
Sirian must be likely to cause harm the
[28]
term likely includes acts that
[30]
ultimately failed to cause harm such
[34]
likely harm is twofold it may consist
[37]
first in any consequence adversely
[39]
affecting the military operations or
[41]
military capacity of a party to the
[44]
conflict the RTR see includes in that
[48]
regard
[48]
not only attacks against enemy personnel
[51]
or goods but also other types of actions
[55]
such as restricting or disturbing enemy
[58]
deployment interception of enemy
[61]
communications and transmission of
[63]
targeting information for an attack the
[68]
likely harm caused by an action can also
[70]
consist in any death injury or
[73]
destruction of a person's or objects
[75]
protected against attacks including
[78]
civilians and civilian objects the
[82]
targeting of civilians by a civilian
[85]
sniper or the government of civilian
[87]
areas may fall into that category
[92]
however harm to civilian population
[95]
which will not consist in death injury
[97]
or destruction excluded from the
[100]
definition this is the case even if they
[105]
result in a mistreatment of the civilian
[107]
population and thus will be prohibited
[110]
under a charlief carried out by armed
[113]
forces like the arrest and deportation
[117]
of civilian populations
[122]
the second general requirement
[124]
identified by the our CRC is that there
[127]
is a direct causation between the act
[129]
and the resulting harm this means
[133]
according to the RC RC that the harm in
[137]
question must be brought about in one
[139]
causal step acts which merely enable or
[144]
enhance the capacity to cause armed
[146]
excluded from the definition of
[149]
participation in austerities those acts
[154]
that fall under what may be called the
[156]
general war effort I referred to as
[160]
indirect participation
[164]
they include working in an armaments
[167]
factory or providing one party to the
[169]
conflict with supplies and services
[172]
outside of the context of a specific
[175]
military operation the RCR see clearly
[180]
distinguish the causal proximity of an
[183]
act with the resulting harm from
[185]
temporal and geographic proximity a
[190]
belligerent may use means of war which
[193]
have delayed effects such as mines or
[197]
booby traps or which are controlled
[200]
remotely such as unmanned aircraft
[204]
however geographical or temporal
[207]
proximity to the resulting harm does not
[209]
constitute an autonomous criterion for
[212]
determining whether the act amounts to
[215]
direct participation in austerities it
[220]
may only serve as an indicator of the
[223]
direct causation between the act and the
[226]
resulting harm the RZR see also
[230]
addresses two situations of
[232]
interconnected acts the first consists
[236]
of several acts connected by an
[238]
interrupted chain of causality that
[240]
result in harming the adversary or the
[243]
protected persons or good an example of
[247]
this is the assembly and storage of an
[250]
improvised explosive device in this
[254]
situation only the final act
[256]
maybe considered to be a direct
[258]
participation in austerities the other
[262]
situation of intercalated acts concerns
[265]
collective mitri operations that
[268]
directly cause harm such as attacks by
[272]
unmanned aerial vehicles which often
[275]
employ civilian contractors one
[279]
operation may indeed involve several
[282]
persons although acts of those person do
[285]
not amount to direct participation in
[287]
austerities if they are taken
[289]
individually the requirement of direct
[293]
causation is satisfied if those acts
[295]
constitute an integral part of one
[298]
coordinated operation the last and third
[304]
criterion considered by the rclc
[306]
is the belligerent Nexus the act must be
[311]
closely related to the austerities and
[314]
constitute an integral part of those
[316]
austerities it must be performed in
[319]
order to support a party to an armed
[321]
conflict to the detriment of the other
[326]
this allows two distinguishing ordinary
[329]
violence from violence linked to an
[332]
armed conflict concerned by military
[336]
realities the rtrc provides that such an
[339]
exist must be objectively assessed in
[343]
light of the design of the act
[345]
regardless of the intention of the
[348]
individual
[356]
you