Marketing Campaigns That Went Horribly Wrong - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[9]
Marketing is definitely not a science.
[10]
They can teach it in school, people can claim to be experts in it, but sometimes even the
[16]
most successful businesses and brands drop the ball in absolutely stunning ways.
[21]
A good campaign is a rare thing, and it inspires consumers to go out and consume your products.
[28]
Most campaigns are perhaps effective but forgettable at the same time.
[32]
And then a select few are bungled so badly that they’ll be talked about for years to
[37]
come and used as examples of what you should never, ever do.
[41]
Like these ones.
[44]
10.
[46]
Aqua Teen Hunger Force Bomb Scare
[48]
It’s a good rule of thumb that if your advertising campaign immediately invokes a police response
[53]
because people think you placed improvised explosive devices around the city you’ve
[58]
done something wrong.
[60]
This was the case in 2007 with a guerrilla marketing campaign for the Aqua Teen Hunger
[64]
Force movie in Boston.
[66]
Turner Broadcasting took responsibility for a series of LED light displays that were placed
[70]
on buildings depicting the Mooninites characters.
[73]
For whatever reason, when people saw these with their hastily wired and powered frames,
[77]
complete with some electrical tape and exposed wiring, they determined it must have been
[81]
a terror attack in the making.
[82]
Word is that it took the intervention of a staffer at the Boston mayor’s office before
[86]
law enforcement officials even realized what was going on.
[89]
Because everyone who had fallen under the impression that these were explosives was
[93]
too old to know what Aqua Teen Hunger Force was, only this young staffer was able to point
[98]
out that this was a cartoon character everyone was getting so worked up about.
[102]
The whole debacle was labelled a bomb hoax even though no one was implying there were
[105]
any bombs anywhere and while it did garner some attention, it was probably not what the
[110]
producers of the show were hoping for.
[112]
9.
[113]
Miracle Mattress’s 9/11 Nightmare
[115]
Every year in September we remember the events of 9/11, and often businesses will do something
[119]
to commemorate the somber occasion.
[121]
In 2016, Miracle Mattress in Texas decided that their best method of memorializing the
[126]
events of September 11th would be to have a twin tower mattress sale, complete with
[131]
a commercial in which two employees fall backwards into twin towers of mattresses, knocking them
[137]
over.
[140]
It was arguably one of the most tone-deaf advertising campaigns in the history of advertising.
[146]
If there’s one rule that most companies will go by, it’s not to make comedy out
[149]
of tragic loss of human life, especially for the sake of making a few dollars off of a
[155]
mattress.
[156]
The backlash was fairly severe.
[158]
The owner of the company issued a statement apologizing for what happened, claiming that
[161]
the commercial had been done by one single location without his approval.
[165]
The woman featured in the commercial made a tearful apology video but the damage was
[168]
clearly done at that point.
[170]
8.
[171]
The McAfrika Mistake
[172]
A fresh, tasty pita topped with seasoned beef, cheese, and tomatoes sure does sound tasty,
[178]
and that’s what McDonald’s thought in the year 2002 when they released it in Norway
[183]
as the McAfrika.
[184]
That proved to be a very bad move.
[187]
While Norway no doubt had consumers eager to eat the tasty snack, the fact that a terrible
[192]
famine gripped Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Malawi and many other African nations at that
[198]
very same moment made it a case of utterly abysmal timing.
[203]
Despite widespread criticism for being insensitive, McDonald’s did not stop selling the burger
[207]
and kept it on sale for as long as they’d intended.
[210]
Their concession was to allow charities to collect for African famine aid at McDonald’s
[214]
locations at the same time.
[216]
Proving that McDonald’s was really adamant about digging their heels in, they even re-released
[220]
the McAfrika six years later to support the Olympics and got the same negative feedback
[225]
a second time.
[228]
7.
[230]
Toyota Stalker
[231]
A good sign that your marketing campaign has gone off the rails is when a court allows
[234]
a person to proceed with a $10 million lawsuit against your company for cyberstalking.
[240]
That’s exactly what happened to Toyota with their guerilla “stalking” campaign.
[244]
It started when Amber Duick got a random email from a guy named Sebastian Bowler.
[249]
Amber lived in LA and it seemed that Sebastian was from the UK.
[252]
He emailed letting her know he was coming to visit.
[255]
Amber had no idea who he was and just ignored it as spam.
[258]
The next day he emailed her again, dropping her home address in the email, saying that
[263]
he was coming to lay low.
[265]
He was also bringing his pitbull, who had a problem with vomiting.
[269]
Sebastian continued sending daily emails to Amber, each one from a location slightly closer
[274]
to her home.
[275]
The emails detailed how he was trying to avoid the police as he roadtripped across America
[279]
(in a Toyota Matrix, of course) to her home.
[282]
Once she even got an email from a motel where Sebastian had apparently stayed, giving her
[286]
a bill for a room the man had trashed.
[288]
As it turns out, it was all a “prank” orchestrated by Toyota.
[295]
Toyota claimed Duick had agreed to be a part of an “experience” while she claimed she
[299]
had no idea this was going to happen to her and suffered serious emotional distress.
[304]
How did it end?
[306]
Settled out of court.
[308]
6.
[309]
Spotify’s Murder Doll
[311]
You can make a solid argument that this Spotify commercial is actually a really good commercial,
[316]
but it still got banned in the UK.
[318]
The commercial features the Camila Cabello song “Havana” and a creepy little doll
[322]
that apparently murders people whenever the song comes on.
[325]
It’s filmed in much the same style as a horror movie, with quick flashes of the scary
[329]
doll and people screaming as it stalks them through a house.
[333]
The problem with the ad was that it was deemed to be too scary, which you could argue is
[337]
a compliment, but it still makes it a fail at the same time.
[341]
The Advertising Standards Authority ruled that while they understood it was a parody
[344]
of the horror genre, it was still likely to cause undue stress to children who saw it,
[349]
and so the ad had to be removed.
[363]
5.
[374]
Pepsi’s Harrier Jet
[385]
Humor is a tricky thing, and what one person finds funny another person will find offensive.
[390]
What one person thinks is a joke another may take very seriously.
[394]
Pepsi learned this the hard way back in 1996.
[398]
In 1996, Pepsi ran a campaign where customers could collect Pepsi Points and exchange them
[402]
for swag like t-shirts or hats.
[405]
The more Pepsi Points you collected, the better swag you could get.
[409]
And in their commercial they tossed in a joke about how if you collected seven million Pepsi
[413]
Points they would hook you up with a Harrier jet.
[416]
John Leonard thought that sounded like a great deal.
[421]
The fine print on the contest said that you could buy Pepsi Points for just $0.10 a piece
[425]
without any purchase required of Pepsi products.
[429]
That meant a Harrier jet was only going to set you back $700,000.
[432]
While Pepsi obviously meant this as a joke, assuming no one would ever actually collect
[436]
seven million Pepsi Points, Leonard figured this was a sound investment because the Harrier
[441]
jet normally came with a price tag of about $23 million at the time.
[445]
So the 21-year-old found five investors to front him $700,000 and he sent it off to Pepsi
[451]
to await his jet.
[453]
Obviously this didn’t work out and a lawsuit came of it, which Pepsi ended up winning after
[457]
a judge decided that no reasonable person could have believed Pepsi was going to hand
[461]
over a multimillion-dollar machine of war in exchange for buying soft drinks.
[465]
Still, they learned their lesson and when they ran the campaign later on they changed
[469]
it from seven million points to 700 million points.
[473]
4.
[474]
Ikea’s Pee Coupon
[475]
Everyone likes a coupon, and it’s hard to think of new ways to innovate getting those
[479]
to customers.
[480]
Leave it to IKEA to be ahead of the pack.
[483]
In 2018, the Swedish company rolled out an ad featuring a picture of a crib.
[488]
The text read “peeing on this ad could change your life.”
[491]
So right away they clearly did something a little odd here.
[495]
The idea behind this was that if you were pregnant, you could get 50% off the crib.
[499]
How could you prove you were pregnant?
[501]
The ad doubles as a home pregnancy test, so that if a woman did in fact urinate on it
[506]
and it proved she was pregnant, then the coupon for the crib would appear.
[510]
On the one hand, it is very innovative, and on the other hand you have to urinate on it
[515]
and then bring it to a store and give it to someone.
[518]
While the ad campaign actually was praised for being so creative, the fact remains that
[521]
it was literally asking you to bring a urine-soaked advertisement from your home to a store to
[528]
give to some hapless cashier who would then have to perhaps file it away somewhere.
[533]
3.
[534]
Vitamin Water Gets Offensive
[537]
Snapple really pioneered the idea of having cute little phrases inside their bottle caps.
[542]
Unfortunately, not every company is able to replicate that same idea.
[545]
Vitamin Water in Canada tried a similar marketing gimmick by printing messages inside of their
[551]
bottles.
[552]
In Canada there are two official languages and that means messages would have to be printed
[556]
in English and in French.
[557]
This worked out poorly when a customer popped open one of their bottles and found the message
[560]
“you retard” inside.
[563]
The Edmonton woman who opened that particular bottle has a sister with cerebral palsy, which
[568]
made the insulting message all the worse.
[570]
She assumed it was some kind of prank, but it turned out to just be a very poorly managed
[574]
linguistic contest.
[575]
Coca-Cola, which owns Vitamin Water, had been printing one English word and one French word
[579]
inside the bottles caps.
[581]
In French the word “retard” translates as “late.”
[584]
But when an English-speaking person is getting that message, paired with the English word
[588]
“you,” there’s no particularly satisfying explanation for why it happens.
[593]
2.
[594]
LifeLock’s Social Security Bungle
[596]
Few things are more embarrassing than smugly proclaiming you can do something better than
[600]
anyone else and immediately learning how wrong you are.
[603]
The CEO of LifeLock learned this in the hardest and worst way ever.
[607]
In 2006, in an effort to show off just how great their personal identity theft security
[611]
system was, the CEO of LifeLock published his social security number in advertisements.
[616]
The idea was to show off how utterly secure their system could make you.
[620]
It should come as a surprise to absolutely no one that since then his identity has been
[624]
stolen at least 13 different times.
[627]
Adding insult to injury, the company was also slapped with a $12 million lawsuit for false
[631]
advertising since all that identity theft proved their system did not do what they said
[636]
it could do.
[637]
1.
[638]
Heineken Gets Called Out for Racism
[646]
In 2018 Chance the Rapper took to Twitter to call out a commercial from Heineken that
[649]
he felt was being explicitly racist.
[652]
The commercial, which uses the slogan “sometimes lighter is better,” featured a bartender
[656]
sliding a bottle of Heineken to a woman who looks like she really needs a drink.
[660]
So far, so good.
[661]
The problem was when you combine the “sometimes lighter is better” slogan with the visuals
[666]
in the commercial.
[668]
The bartender was light-skinned, the woman who receives the beer is light-skinned, and
[673]
everyone else is not.
[674]
The beer slides down the bar past no less than three visibly dark-skinned people before
[679]
it gets to the woman who drinks it.
[680]
Now maybe it was only Heineken’s intention to be discussing the shade of the beer, but
[684]
their casting choices made race become a prominent issue.