Leveraging Real-world and Risk Neutral ESG solutions within Insurance | Numerix Video Blog - YouTube

Channel: numerixanalytics

[14]
Jim Jockle (Host): Hi welcome to Numerix Video Blog. I'm your host Jim Jockle. Joining
[17]
me today is Alex Marion, VP of Product Management here at Numerix for insurance products. Alex
[21]
how are you? Alex Marion (Guest): I'm great.
[22]
Jockle: Alex last time we talked, we talked about trends in insurance companies and elements
[27]
of onboarding new technologies. And bucking the trend of overseeing more on the banking
[33]
side and the capital market side, where we're starting to see a lot more outsourcing and
[37]
investment. In insurance, we're seeing insourcing. And one of the areas in particular is around
[43]
economic scenario generation. Perhaps, first of all, could you give us a good definition
[49]
of economic scenario generation? And then let's talk about some of the trends of why
[53]
insurance companies are starting to inboard new technologies.
[56]
Marion: Sure. Well there are two dominant use cases of economic scenario generation
[60]
technology in insurance companies. The first one, is risk neutral ESG's. Which are risk
[66]
neutral models which are models used for pricing and hedging, embedded derivatives in insurance
[72]
products such as variable annuities or fixed index annuities. So, risk neutral dynamics
[76]
are the absolute correct dynamics to use for valuing these embedded derivatives just like
[80]
they would at banks. The other use case is what they call real world or realistic scenario
[87]
generation and under these, that have been around for a while in insurance companies
[91]
and companies are now using a stochastic set of real world scenarios to project forward
[97]
their liabilities for capital and reserving requirements. And they're looking to do
[101]
that on an enterprise wide platform so for things like AG 43 calculations, or risk based
[109]
cap, or economic capital applications, they're all using these real world ESG solutions to
[115]
project forward their balance sheet across different lines of business.
[118]
Jockle: So we've also in annuity space have seen a lot of moving around in terms of people
[124]
entering the business, people exiting the business, buying different books of business,
[128]
what is a best practice as it relates to building these books after driven through lack of a
[133]
better term acquisition. Marion: Sure so there has been a lot of M&A
[137]
activity in the insurance space, a lot of it has been about rebuilding capital positions
[142]
and trying to decide how do we effectively deploy capital. So when risk managers in insurance
[149]
executives are looking at the opportunities in a market they have to have the tools that
[154]
help them turn data information into management decisions. What lines of business will I best
[161]
deploy my capital to? What other lines of business should I be de-risking - are they
[165]
consuming capital? And to do that they really need a consistent enterprise risk management
[171]
framework across different products and different lines of business and economic scenario generators
[175]
allow them to unify these different legacy cash flow systems and different valuation
[181]
systems in the single consistent framework. Jockle: So you've mentioned in essence -- stochastic
[186]
on stochastic issues. Which brings its own host of challenges in terms of deploying different
[193]
hybrid models and moving away from more traditional -- black and things of that nature. Tell
[198]
me a little bit more about the onboarding's of this type of technology and how equipped
[206]
are these companies to maneuver more complex models.
[209]
Marion: Sure. So if you look at the variable annuity market or the fixed index market where
[216]
these annuities have these embedded derivatives, a lot of companies are bringing their hedge
[221]
programs in-house. Right, so they're dynamically hedging the embedded derivative risk whether
[226]
its guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits, other VA guarantees, or some of the fixed
[230]
index annuity crediting strategies. When they do reserves calculations or hedge strategy
[236]
projection on some of these businesses, they have to project forward that hedging strategy
[241]
and to do that, they have to have an outer loop of realistic scenarios to project forward
[246]
the business but they have to revalue those hedges and the liabilities at each interlope
[252]
node along those real world paths. So that's the general framework of the nested
[256]
stochastic problem and it can be very computationally intense. Now if you have a consistent modelling
[263]
dynamic between your risk neutral models and your real world models, you can build out
[267]
a nested stochastic framework that's consistent, it's defensible, and it's optimized for
[274]
computational run time. And a lot of companies now are looking to use cloud computing solutions
[280]
to enhance their nested stochastic capabilities by overcoming some of the run time issues.
[286]
Jockle: And that's more from an infrastructure as a server -- burst to cloud?
[289]
Marion: Sure. Right exactly. Jockle: So one of the questions as a driver
[293]
also the hedging programs themselves and the strategies being employed are becoming much
[297]
more sophisticated. Marion: Sure. For example in a variable annuity
[302]
market, a lot of companies have been trying to move the hedging from the insurer back
[306]
to the policy holder in the form of these risk managed funds. Whether they are managed
[312]
vol strategies, or capital protection overlays, they're farming out some of that risk, whether
[319]
it's vega risk, they're moving into the funds. The funds are de-risking as the market
[324]
goes down as volatility increases and that translates to a lower greek profile for some
[329]
of the embedded guarantees, and a lower hedging cost. So, as part of the de-risking theme
[335]
in the variable annuity market, this has been the central component of that is to move the
[340]
guarantee derivative risk over to the policy holder in the form of these managed products.
[344]
Jockle: Well, Alex I'd like to thank you so much for your time today. And of course
[348]
we'd like to talk about the topics that you'd like to talk about. So if you're
[350]
on twitter, please add us at @nxanalytics, or on LinkedIn to stay up to date for all
[354]
the conversations that we have, whether it's our webinar programs or events, or updates
[358]
on our video blogs. So with that, I'm going to say thank you again Alex.
[361]
Marion: Thank you. Jockle: And we'll see you next time.