馃攳
Why JPMorgan Is Cutting Its Bloomberg Terminals - YouTube
Channel: The Motley Fool
[0]
Chris Hill: Let's move over to financial services.
JPMorgan is one of those big Wall Street banks
[6]
that makes a lot of money. That doesn't mean
that CEO Jamie Dimon isn't looking to tighten
[13]
up the purse strings a little bit, and now
we see reports that he's looking to cut the
[22]
Bloomberg terminals at his business. And when
you consider that a Bloomberg terminal costs
[29]
$21K a year to rent, and they've got ... a
couple thousand?
[37]
Bill Mann: They're spending easily a couple
thousand! I saw a number, and you would hope
[42]
that I would have verified it before I came
in to the studio, but I saw a number that
[46]
was in the 8 digits for how much they're spending
on Bloomberg each year at JPMorgan.
[54]
Hill: I kind of like that Jamie Dimon is saying,
"You know what? We don't need all these, and
[60]
maybe we don't need any of these."
[61]
Mann: Yeah, I think that probably, one, the
folks at ... I'm trying to use a word other
[70]
than "mafia," but I'm going to fail at it.
I think Bloomberg is the closest thing to
[74]
a mafia power that exists in finance, because
it is such a default, and they have been able,
[81]
for years, to come in and say, "Well, this
is our pricing. Discount? No. There's no discount.
[86]
This is our pricing." So, even for places
like JPMorgan, there are now credible alternatives
[95]
to Bloomberg, and one that is very exciting
to a lot of people is called Eikon.
[99]
Hill: It's not tied to Carl Ichan, is it?
[106]
Mann: No, but that would be awesome. Different
spelling. So, Carl Ichan ... I bet he's going
[113]
to try to take credit for it now, like, "Why
didn't I think of that?!" So, they may be
[120]
negotiating a little bit, but it may be as
much a message for his staff inside, "If you
[128]
want this $21K a year terminal, you had best
be producing. So, if you're a producer, we
[134]
have no problem whatsoever. But if you're
not a producer, this is the beginning of a
[138]
list of things that are at question, probably
including your job, but we'll start here."
[145]
Hill: And for those unfamiliar, Bloomberg,
as general consumers, as retail investors,
[153]
we're much more likely to encounter Bloomberg
the news organization, Bloomberg podcasts,
[158]
etc., and Michael Bloomberg built that media
empire. But the goose that lays the golden
[164]
egg year after year for Bloomberg is these
terminals, which cost $21K a year, and essentially
[172]
give you any financial information you could
ever want at your fingertips. And in the 1980s
[178]
and 90s, I could see where, "This is a must-have,
we have to have this." But now, I just look
[184]
at it, and I don't know.
[186]
Mann: Bloomberg is the closest thing that
they have on Wall Street that is like the
[191]
owl network in the Harry Potter world. They
have their own news service, and it's a closed
[197]
environment, but they also have a messaging
service that is highly prized, because everyone
[202]
on Wall Street -- and by Wall Street, I don't
just mean New York City, I mean San Francisco,
[206]
Tokyo, Kazakhstan, whatever, whoever's in
finance -- they have a Bloomberg terminal
[211]
so they can speak with each other, it's a
secured messaging system. And it's closed.
[221]
I think the vapor lock they have on that business
is breaking a little bit, and Jamie Dimon
[227]
is swinging a hammer. But it's not something
that people who are outside of finance are
[231]
necessarily familiar with, just how dependent
people are in finance on Bloomberg.
[237]
Hill: And I can see, particularly for smaller
outfits, not necessarily for something the
[242]
size of JPMorgan, one of the benefits is it's
a little bit of a status symbol. You're bringing
[249]
clients in, "Oh, yeah, we're in touch with
everything, because we've got a Bloomberg
[253]
terminal."
[254]
Mann: Every picture of every trading floor
or every PM shop you've ever seen seems to
[259]
have a Bloomberg terminal in the back, and
it has some chart or whatever. That's an expensive
[266]
backdrop. We don't have one. We don't use
Bloomberg at all. I think we are ... yeah,
[273]
we're definitely out of the ordinary. Whenever
we get asked by a broker, "Send us your Bloomberg
[279]
contact," and we don't have one ... But, I
don't see the need for us. I really don't.
[287]
And I think the absolute need amongst people
in finance is declining.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





