Marginal Utility - YouTube

Channel: Khan Academy

[0]
What I want to do in this video is think about a concept
[3]
that we've already thought about multiple times
[5]
in the context of many, many videos.
[7]
And this is the idea of utility-- utility, which
[10]
is really just a way of saying how much benefit
[15]
or satisfaction or value do you get out
[18]
of getting a good or service.
[21]
But the angle that we're going to take in this video
[23]
is going to be slightly different.
[24]
In the past, when we were measuring benefit or value,
[28]
we either measured in terms of dollars,
[30]
where we said, hey, the benefit of getting an incremental Honda
[34]
Civic was $5,000.
[36]
And we talk about the incremental--
[37]
we're talking about, and we've heard the word many times--
[39]
we were talking about the marginal benefit.
[41]
Or early on, when we talked about the production
[43]
possibilities frontier and we talked
[46]
about the marginal benefit of another squirrel,
[49]
we were talking about it in terms of berries.
[51]
We were talking about it in terms
[52]
of another good or service.
[54]
What we're going to do in this video
[55]
is just think about it in absolute terms.
[57]
We're just going to think of some arbitrary way of measuring
[60]
utility and then just assign values to.
[64]
What's the value of getting one chocolate bar?
[66]
And then what's the value that we give to the next chocolate
[69]
bar and then the chocolate bar after that?
[70]
And we're going to do the same things about fruit.
[72]
And from that, we're going to see
[74]
if we can build up some of the things
[76]
that we already know about demand curves
[78]
and how things relate to price and the price of other goods
[82]
and things like that.
[83]
And in particular, we're going to focus on marginal utility.
[90]
So obviously, you could have total utility.
[93]
If I have four chocolate bars, you
[96]
could say the total utility I'm getting from all four of them.
[99]
Or, you could think about marginal utility,
[101]
the utility I'm getting from the next incremental chocolate
[104]
bar or the next incremental pound of fruit.
[108]
And before I move on, there's one thing--
[110]
and this was a point of confusion for me
[111]
when I first learned this-- is OK,
[113]
I'm using the word marginal utility now.
[115]
In the past, I've used the word marginal benefit.
[120]
They sound very similar.
[122]
In fact, I even used the word benefit
[124]
when I defined the word utility.
[126]
How are these two things different?
[128]
And the simple answer is, conceptually, they aren't.
[131]
Conceptually, they are the exact same thing.
[134]
The difference is how the words tend
[137]
to be used in the context of a traditional microeconomics
[140]
class.
[141]
So when people talk about utility,
[143]
they tend to measure it in terms of some type
[146]
of absolute measure that they just came up with.
[149]
You can view them as utility unit,
[151]
some type of satisfaction units.
[153]
While when they talk about marginal benefit,
[155]
they tend to measure it either in dollars
[157]
or in terms of some other goods.
[158]
But I've seen either term used either way.
[161]
So they really do mean the exact same thing.
[164]
But in this video, we're going to use the term utility,
[166]
and we're going to come up with a measuring scale,
[169]
and it's a somewhat arbitrary one.
[171]
And we're going to use that to come up
[172]
with some conclusions about the basket of goods someone
[177]
might purchase depending on different prices.
[180]
So as you could imagine, I pre-wrote these two things.
[183]
We're going to talk about chocolate bars,
[185]
and we are going to talk about fruit.
[188]
So right here in these little tables here,
[190]
I've shown the marginal utility of each incremental.
[193]
In the case of chocolate bars, each incremental bar,
[196]
and in the case of fruit, each incremental pound of fruit.
[200]
So this is saying that first chocolate bar-- obviously,
[202]
if I have no chocolate bars I'm getting
[204]
no utility from chocolate bars-- and this
[206]
is saying that that first chocolate
[208]
bar has a marginal utility.
[209]
So the utility of that next incremental one is 100.
[213]
I'm not saying $100.
[214]
I'm not saying it's equivalent to 100 pounds of fruit.
[216]
I'm not saying it's equivalent to 100 berries.
[219]
I'm just arbitrarily saying it is 100.
[222]
And what matters is not that this
[224]
is 100 or 1,000 or a million.
[225]
What matters is how this compares to other things.
[228]
So for example, if I-- let's say this is 100,
[232]
and if I know that I like fruit-- a pound of fruit--
[235]
20% more than that first-- Or if I like
[238]
an incremental-- my first pound of fruit-- 20% more,
[241]
then I would have to say that the marginal utility
[243]
of my first pound of fruit is 120.
[246]
And this is what we said right over here.
[249]
And if, another way to think about it
[251]
is, if the marginal utility of the second chocolate
[255]
bar I get-- because I've already enjoyed
[256]
a little bit of chocolate bar, and I'm a little chocolated
[259]
out-- is 20% less than that, then if this is 100,
[262]
then this would have to be 80.
[263]
I could have set this to be 1,000 and this
[265]
to be 800 and this to be 1,200.
[267]
I could have set this to be 10 and this
[269]
to be 8 and this to be 12.
[271]
What matters is, is that they really just
[273]
have the same ratios between them that really do
[275]
reflect my actual preferences.
[277]
So let's just think about this a little bit.
[279]
My first chocolate bar, I'm pretty excited.
[281]
I just call it 100.
[283]
The next chocolate bar, I'm a little bit less excited
[285]
about it.
[286]
I've already had some chocolate.
[287]
My craving has been satiated to some degree,
[289]
but I still like chocolate.
[290]
So I'll call that an 80.
[292]
We could call it 80 satisfaction units,
[294]
whatever you want to call it.
[295]
Then the next chocolate bar after this-- now I'm
[297]
starting to get pretty stuffed, and I'm really chocolated out.
[301]
And so I'm not getting as much benefit from it.
[303]
And then finally if you give me another chocolate bar,
[305]
it's even less.
[306]
And if we were to list a fifth chocolate bar,
[307]
I might not want it at all.
[309]
My marginal utility might go to 0 maybe
[311]
for that fifth chocolate bar.
[312]
Maybe that sixth chocolate bar, I have to somehow get rid of it
[315]
somehow, because I'm so tired of chocolate bars.
[317]
Maybe it'll have a negative marginal utility.
[319]
And we could think about the same thing with fruit.
[323]
The first pound of fruit, I'm pretty excited about fruit.
[327]
I have a fruit craving.
[329]
I like that first pound of fruit even more
[331]
than that first chocolate bar.
[332]
I like it 20% more.
[334]
So I get to 120, you could call it utility points
[337]
or whatever arbitrary unit you want to call it.
[340]
Then my next pound of fruit, once again
[342]
I'm having diminishing utility, diminishing benefit
[346]
as I get more and more incremental pounds of fruit.
[349]
Now, it's very important to realize
[351]
this is marginal utility, not total utility.
[355]
This is a utility I'm getting from each incremental pound.
[358]
It's positive, so I'm still enjoying
[361]
that next incremental pound.
[362]
I'm just enjoying it a little bit less than the pound before.
[365]
And to realize what total utility is,
[367]
if I were to have two pounds of fruit,
[369]
I would have 120 of utility from that first pound.
[375]
And then I would have 100 from the second pound.
[377]
And so you would say I had a total utility of 220,
[382]
you could call them utility units, from both pounds.
[385]
Now with just the information that I've given here,
[387]
there's a few things you could say.
[389]
You could say, well look, my first pound of fruit
[391]
I enjoy more, 20% more than my first chocolate bar.
[396]
You could also say that my second pound of fruit,
[398]
I enjoy it or I could derive about the same amount of value
[402]
as my first chocolate bar.
[404]
You could say that my second chocolate bar
[406]
I enjoy less than my first chocolate bar.
[408]
You could even say 20% less if these numbers are good.
[410]
But this still doesn't give you a lot
[412]
of information about how you would actually
[413]
spend your money.
[414]
You might say, well, obviously wouldn't you
[416]
want to just buy fruit over chocolate bars,
[418]
or at least that first pound of fruit over that first chocolate
[421]
bar?
[422]
Well, you might, but it depends on how much that fruit actually
[425]
costs.
[426]
Just looking at this alone, we can just
[428]
make relative judgments about how much
[430]
we prefer each incremental bar or each incremental pound
[433]
or them relative to each other.
[434]
But it really doesn't tell us how
[436]
we would spend our actual money.
[438]
So let's think about things.
[439]
Let's put some prices on some of these goods
[441]
and think about how we would actually
[443]
allocate our dollar given these marginal utility
[445]
numbers right over here.
[447]
So let's say that the chocolate bars are $1 per bar.
[455]
And let's say that the fruit is $2 per pound.
[460]
So this is going to be per pound.
[461]
This is going to be per bar.
[463]
And what we're going to think about
[464]
is we're going to think about marginal utility
[467]
for that incremental chocolate bar per price
[471]
of that incremental chocolate bar.
[473]
And here the price is going to be at $1 per pound.
[477]
So here, for that first bar, I'm going to be spending $1,
[481]
and I'm getting 100 marginal utility
[483]
points, whatever you want to call it.
[485]
So I'm getting 100 marginal utility points for that dollar.
[487]
So I'm getting 100 marginal utility points per dollar.
[491]
Here, same logic.
[493]
I'm getting 80 marginal utility points per dollar.
[495]
This is pretty simple math.
[496]
Here I'm getting 60 marginal utility points for the dollar.
[499]
Here I'm getting 40.
[501]
So that doesn't seem too interesting.
[502]
It might be a little bit more interesting here.
[504]
What is the marginal utility per incremental fruit
[507]
that I'm getting per dollar, per price, or actually per price
[513]
of the incremental fruit here?
[515]
Well here, that first pound of fruit I'm
[517]
getting 120 marginal utility points we could call them.
[520]
But I paid $2 for it.
[522]
So 120-- let me write it over here.
[526]
So for that first incremental fruit,
[528]
the marginal utility for that first fruit is 120.
[532]
And the price of that first pound of fruit is equal to 2.
[537]
So I'm getting 60 marginal utility points per dollar.
[540]
I'm getting 60.
[542]
Here, 100 marginal utility points, but I'm spending $2.
[546]
So that's 50 points per dollar.
[548]
This is 25 points per dollar.
[550]
This is 10 points per dollar.
[552]
Now this makes things a little bit more interesting.
[555]
If I had $5 to spend, how would I want to spend my $5?
[567]
What you really just want to think about,
[568]
where are you getting the most satisfaction for each dollar?
[571]
Where are you getting the most bang for your buck?
[574]
So where am I going to spend my first dollar?
[576]
So dollar one.
[578]
So let's think about it a little bit.
[579]
My first dollar, where am I going
[583]
to get the most satisfaction per dollar?
[586]
Well, I get the most satisfaction
[588]
per dollar right over here.
[589]
I get 100 satisfaction units for a dollar.
[591]
Even though I like a pound of fruit,
[593]
I'm getting less satisfaction per dollar.
[596]
So I'm getting less bang for my buck.
[598]
So my first dollar is going to go right over there.
[602]
I'm going to buy one candy bar.
[604]
Then where am I going to spend my second dollar?
[608]
So once again, I just want to look at all of my options,
[610]
and we're going to assume that I'm
[612]
going to spend my $5 on either of these two just
[614]
to limit our universe.
[616]
Once again, I'm going to maximize my bang for buck.
[619]
I get 80 satisfaction points or marginal utility points
[622]
over here per dollar.
[623]
I only get 60 over here.
[624]
So I'm going to buy even a second chocolate bar.
[630]
Let's keep going.
[631]
Where am I going to spend my third dollar?
[634]
Now, it gets a little bit interesting.
[637]
I could spend my third dollar right over here and get
[640]
60 points per dollar, or I could spend it over
[644]
here and get 60 points per dollar.
[646]
I'd actually get the same amount.
[647]
There are both 60 points per dollar.
[649]
So I'm kind of neutral.
[650]
I'm going to get the same bang for my buck
[652]
whether I get another chocolate bar
[653]
or whether I get another fruit.
[655]
So just for simplicity, let's say
[657]
I get another chocolate bar.
[659]
I could have got the fruit too.
[661]
It's really a toss up.
[662]
I could flip a coin, and I choose
[664]
to get another chocolate bar.
[666]
So I first spent my first $3 on three chocolate bars.
[669]
Now where am I going to spend my fourth dollar?
[671]
Well, my fourth dollar, now my best bang for my buck
[675]
isn't to get another chocolate bar.
[676]
I'm only going to get 40 units per buck there.
[679]
Now it is to spend it on fruit.
[681]
So now the next dollar I could spend on half a pound of fruit,
[684]
and I would get this.
[687]
So my fourth dollar I could spend
[690]
on this for half a pound of fruit
[692]
because it's $2 per pound.
[694]
And then I could spend my fifth dollar there too.
[697]
So this is my fourth and my fifth dollar because it's $2.
[699]
You could think of it that we're spending
[701]
$2 for one pound of fruit.
[703]
And we're getting 60 utility points per dollar.
[706]
So we're getting the best bang for our buck right over there.
[709]
But what was useful about this is
[711]
it allowed us without thinking about money
[713]
to say how much do we like these things irrespective
[715]
of their actual price and then give it a certain price.
[718]
It allowed us to think rationally about, well,
[721]
how would we actually spend our money.
[723]
In this case, when chocolate bars are $1
[726]
and fruit is $2 per pound, we decided
[728]
to buy three chocolate bars and only one pound of fruit.