đ
9 WORST Company Failures! - YouTube
Channel: Factnomenal
[3]
9 WORST Company Failures
[5]
#9.
[6]
âKodakâ- The Eastman Kodak Company was
founded in 1888 and was the most successful
[11]
company in the photography industry during
the 20th Century.
[14]
They were the leaders in bringing the cutting
edge of photographic technology and easy to
[17]
use cameras to the hands of consumers throughout
the world.
[20]
But Kodak almost met its demise at the hands
of a product that it actually invented: digital
[24]
photography.
[25]
Kodak invented this technology in 1975, but
failed to jump on the innovation, believing
[29]
that common applications for it were well
into the future.
[32]
Early on, the company thought that the high
cost and complexity that would be needed to
[36]
make a push into the digital front werenât
in Kodakâs best interests.
[39]
So, Kodak put digital photography to the side
to be picked back up when the time was financially
[44]
advantageous, but they waited too long.
[46]
By the time they switched gears, they faced
competitors who had been perfecting their
[49]
business models with digital photography at
the center, whereas Kodakâs model was still
[53]
dependent on printed photos.
[55]
While other companies made deals with websites,
phone companies and focused on online based
[59]
imaging, Kodak floundered and in 2012 filed
for Bankruptcy.
[63]
They have since come back from bankruptcy
and started specializing in producing smartphones
[66]
and tablets.
[67]
#8.
[68]
âPan Americanâ- From 1927 until 1991,
Pan Am was the largest airline company in
[74]
the United States, but due to bad foresight,
callous labor practices and an uncontrollable
[79]
disaster this global giant quickly met its
end.
[82]
The company basically had a monopoly on overseas
travel until World War II but was dealt its
[86]
first major blow when other strong airline
companies began to up their game.
[90]
Pan Am fought off the competitors with its
innovations such as jumbo jets and an advanced
[94]
system for making reservations but these innovations
couldnât match the corporate aptitude and
[98]
human relations that the other airlines dealt
with more astutely.
[101]
One of the main reasons for Pan Amâs failure
was ironically due to its early successes.
[105]
Because of the sheer size of its fleet, it
was the company hit the hardest by the 1973
[109]
oil crisis.
[110]
Just before the crisis, Pan Am had just purchased
a number of brand new gas-guzzling Boeing
[114]
747s and was forced to dramatically raise
ticket prices to recuperate.
[119]
As it was trying to recover from this setback
it had also become a target of terrorism in
[122]
the Middle East.
[123]
To the terrorists Pan Am was a symbol of the
United States overseas because it was the
[127]
largest U.S. airline servicing the area.
[129]
During the Gulf War, in the midst of financial
hardships and battles with labor unions, Pan
[133]
American 103 on a transatlantic flight from
Frankfurt, Germany to Detroit was blown up
[137]
by Libyan nationals above the Scottish town
of Lockerbie.
[141]
The incident scared even more customers away
from flying Pan Am and many travel agents
[144]
would no longer book flights on their planes.
[147]
All of these events and poor managing of them
led Pan American International Airways to
[150]
declare bankruptcy and completely fold in
1991.
[154]
#7.
[155]
âBordersâ- Tom and Louis Borders opened
their first bookstore in 1971.
[160]
Their vast selection of books and innovative
inventory system turned them into the second
[164]
biggest chain of book megastores.
[166]
Due to years of miscalculating the future
of book consumption, the bookstore all but
[169]
vanished in 2011.
[170]
It all started in the mid 90s when Amazon
and other online stores hit the scene.
[175]
Instead of developing their own website and
focusing on online sales, the company decided
[178]
to further their storefront endeavors and
expanded into Europe and Asia opening hundreds
[182]
of stores.
[184]
Their competitor Barnes and Noble, did the
opposite by preparing for the digital age,
[188]
perfecting their online sales system and focusing
on their storefront operations in the United
[192]
States.
[193]
When Borders did start to catch on to the
online market they were already far behind
[196]
and decided to use Amazon as a host for such
sales.
[199]
Because of this, as more and more sales were
made online, instead of receiving 100% of
[202]
the profit they had to share with Amazon.
[204]
Borders also was caught in the past by devoting
lots of money and inventory towards DVDs and
[209]
CDs at a time when digital music and video
was on the rise.
[212]
While Barnes and Noble developed itâs own
e-reader to grab paperless book market by
[216]
the horns, Borders was extremely slow to adapt
to the change.
[219]
All of these factors came to a boiling point
in 2006 when, after several years of losing
[223]
millions of dollars Borders filed for bankruptcy.
[226]
By 2011, Borders realized there was no way
out and closed most of its remaining stores.
[230]
The only stores remaining are in southeast
asia where it remain Borders in name only,
[234]
as they were sold to a company named Popular
Holdings.
[237]
When they closed their doors they sold their
brand trademark and many other assets to longtime
[240]
rival Barnes and Noble.
[242]
#6.
[243]
âNokiaâ- Founded in 1865 as a paper mill,
Nokia slowly worked its way from producing
[248]
paper to the latest technology.
[250]
In 1987, Nokia released the first hand-held
mobile telephone and it was an all-time best
[255]
seller.
[256]
Because of the resounding success, Nokia decided
to switch their companyâs specialty completely
[259]
to telecommunications.
[261]
The Finnish based company would be at the
forefront of cellular telephone production
[264]
and design for the next fifteen years and
even created one of the first smartphones
[267]
back in 1996.
[269]
However, the aspect of creating easy to use
and innovative software for their phones escaped
[273]
them as the phones they created to compete
with the likes of the Apple iPhone and Googleâs
[276]
Android werenât as user-friendly and prone
to bugs.
[279]
This was most likely due to the companyâs
desire to remain hardware focused and resistance
[283]
or inability to become software savvy.
[286]
Almost immediately after the release of the
first iphone Nokiaâs sales started to plummet.
[289]
In order to avoid complete failure, the heads
of Nokia decided to cut their losses and sold
[293]
their phone business to Microsoft in 2013
for 7 billion dollars.
[297]
Chump change when you find out that in 2006
they were worth over 150 billion dollars.
[301]
They have since made a semi-comeback via other
types of technological endeavors such as virtual
[306]
reality cameras, medical tech and networking
equipment.
[309]
In 2016, Nokia made a net profit of 26 billion
dollars.
[314]
#5.
[315]
âSonyâ-The Japanese based company Sony,
founded in 1946, is still one of the most
[318]
powerful tech companies in the world but they
made a giant misstep that cost them the position
[322]
of lead-dog in the portable music industry.
[324]
Throughout the 90s the Sony Walkman was the
main product people turned to for music on-the-go
[328]
but in 2001 Sony was dealt a major blow when
the Apple iPod was released.
[333]
How did Sony not see this coming?
[334]
Well it turns out they did and as early as
the mid 90s the company had the designs and
[339]
ability to create a digital music device that
wouldâve been years ahead of its time but
[343]
they never released it.
[344]
When they realized that they suddenly needed
to catch up they found themselves in the same
[347]
boat that Nokia did with phones.
[349]
They focused too much on making great hardware
and not enough on creating user-friendly software
[353]
and lacked a central vision for their product.
[355]
Instead of having a single streamlined product
like the iPod with an easy to use music interface
[359]
such as iTunes they released several products
that each had their own programming flaws
[363]
and werenât compatible across devices.
[365]
In addition, the devices were made to only
play a single type of music file so they were
[369]
only formatted to play music from companies
Sony had contracts with, unlike iTunes which
[373]
could play several types of files.
[375]
If not for these mistakes Sony may have become
the most powerful tech company in the world
[379]
and relegated Apple to focus on personal computers
avoiding the music business altogether.
[383]
#4.
[384]
âYahooâ- Founded in 1994, Yahoo was one
of the dominant web portals in the early days
[389]
of the internet.
[390]
But due to a series of bad business decisions
or just plain bad luck, the company started
[394]
steadily declining in 2000--leading up to
their acquisition by Verizon on June 13th,
[398]
2017.
[399]
The first major mistake that Yahoo made was
failing in their bid to purchase Google in
[404]
2002.
[405]
When the founders of Google told Yahoo they
would sell for one billion dollars Yahoo initially
[408]
refused, when their chief executive, Terry
Semel, changed his mind and decided to take
[412]
the offer it was too late, as Google decided
they wanted 3 billion instead.
[416]
The next missed opportunity that Yahoo bungled
was not offering more money to acquire Facebook.
[420]
Apparently, Yahoo again offered one billion
dollars to buy the company but Facebook refused.
[425]
Several members of Facebookâs board came
forward saying that if Yahoo had increased
[428]
the offer to 1.1 billion that they would have
voted to sell.
[430]
Yet another deal that fell by the wayside
was when Microsoft offered Yahoo over 40 billion
[434]
dollars to takeover in 2008.
[436]
Yahoo rejected the offer citing that they
thought it was too low, but within a year
[440]
Yahoo came crawling to Microsoft and signed
a deal to use Bing as their search engine,
[444]
giving up on creating their own.
[446]
Finally the main reason for Yahooâs demise
was not adapting fast enough and being content
[450]
with being a web portal in a search engine
world.
[453]
#3.
[454]
âDecca Recordsâ- Decca Records still a
successful record company and exists today
[458]
as part of Universal Music Group, but makes
the list due to a huge lack of foresight that
[462]
would have assured them a position as one
of the worldâs top music companies.
[465]
It comes down to one simple error in judgment--they
didnât sign The Beatles.
[469]
On the first day of 1962, The Beatles auditioned
for the Deccaâs head of Artists and Repertoire,
[474]
Dick Rowe.
[475]
They recorded 15 songs as a demo and though
they were nervous, thought they had the contract
[479]
in the bag.
[480]
But when making his decision Dick Rowe infamously
quipped âguitar groups are on the way outâ
[484]
and turned them down, opting to go with another
group.
[486]
Now this may seem like Dick Rowe was a complete
moron but there a few factors that make his
[490]
position more understandable.
[492]
The Beatles and manager Brian Epstein later
admitted that the demo wasnât their best,
[495]
though they were able to use it to eventually
get a deal with Parlophone from it.
[498]
It also confirmed producer George Martinâs
beliefs that The Beatlesâ current drummer
[501]
Pete Best wasnât the right fit for the group
and led to them replacing him with Ringo Starr.
[506]
On another note it may have partially been
that The Beatles didnât like the potential
[509]
deal that Decca could offer as it required
them to pay for record pressing.
[513]
Decca would eventually recoup from the missed
opportunity thanks to none other than George
[517]
Harrison, as they signed the Rolling Stones
at his recommendation.
[520]
Despite it inevitably working out for both
sides, Dick Rowe would forever be known as
[524]
âthe man who rejected the Beatlesâ.
[526]
#2.
[527]
âSharper Imageâ-Because of the broad unfocused
nature of the quirky retail chain, you might
[532]
say it was destined for failure.
[533]
The fragile business model was based on betting
on the next big thing in home appliances and
[537]
gizmos.
[538]
All it took for the brand to crumble was putting
too much money into a products that failed
[541]
miserably.
[542]
Thatâs exactly what happened with the Ionic
Breeze.
[544]
The product was designed to create a healthy
environment inside of homes by purifying the
[548]
air, but what it did was closer to the opposite.
[551]
In 2003, the magazine Consumer Reports published
an article that completely debunked the validity
[555]
of the Ionic Breeze, finding that it didnât
clean the air and some of the models even
[559]
released dangerous amounts of trioxygen, or
ozone.
[562]
Instead of pulling the product, Sharper Image
decided to sue Consumer Reports for libel
[566]
and restore their credibility.
[568]
This backfired as the court ruled in favor
of Consumer Reports.
[571]
The lawsuit was extreme costly and ended up
only further destroying Sharper Imageâs
[575]
reputation.
[576]
The failed suit coupled with thousands of
angry customers demanding refunds and voicing
[579]
their contempt with the company was a major
factor in Sharper Image filing for bankruptcy
[583]
and closed all of its stores in 2008.
[585]
The company now exists only as an online store
and monthly catalog.
[589]
#1.
[590]
âBlockbusterâ-Though they have slowly
been fading into the back of our memories
[594]
as if a dream, video stores were once a real
thing and were a successful business.
[598]
Blockbuster, founded in 1985, was the biggest
fish in the sea during the home video gold
[602]
rush which reached its pinnacle in 2004.
[604]
But only a few years later the company became
almost non-existent.
[609]
Blockbuster went from having around 9,000
stores worldwide in the 1990s to less than
[613]
a dozen today, most of which are located in
Alaska and most likely wonât be around for
[617]
long.
[618]
So what happened?
[619]
Well in 2000, the heads of Blockbuster including
CEO John Antioco made a decision that in hindsight
[624]
sealed the companyâs fate.
[625]
They were approached by the young upstart
entrepreneur, Reed Hastings with an idea that
[629]
if Blockbuster promoted his video delivery
service, Netflix, in their stores---he would
[633]
run their website and online features.
[635]
Apparently they thought Hastings was joking
and brushed him off.
[639]
Within ten years Blockbuster was filing for
bankruptcy and Netflix was worth over 25 billion
[643]
dollars, five times the 5 billion dollars
that Blockbuster was worth at its peak.
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





