馃攳
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) - YouTube
Channel: unknown
[0]
hello today I am going to explain about
a famous MCDM method known as AHP
[7]
that is analytic hierarchy process
this method can be used to calculate
[13]
weights of criteria this is a simple
decision matrix with four criteria that
[20]
is price, storage space, camera and looks
with five alternative, each alternative
[28]
have their own value of criteria
associated with them the first and
[35]
foremost step in AHP is creating the
hierarchical structure in which goal is
[42]
kept in the first level in this example
the goal is to buy the best mobile-phone
[49]
criteria is kept in the second level and
alternative is kept in level three each
[56]
alternative have their own value of
criteria associated with them example
[62]
each mobile phone will have their own
price or cost associated with them
[69]
similarly each mobile phone will have
their own value of storage space. Second
[77]
step is to create a pairwise comparison
matrix. This pairwise matrix gives the
[84]
relative importance of various attribute
with respect to the goal. If we take this
[91]
example how important is price while
buying a mobile or what is the
[98]
importance of storage space when we buy mobile phone. This pairwise comparison
[106]
matrix is created with the help of scale
of relative importance this is the scale
[112]
of relative importance in which one is
for equal importance 3 is given for
[118]
moderate importance five for strong
importance 7 for very strong 9 and
[124]
extremely important values
[130]
the length of pairwise matrix is
equivalent to the number of criteria
[136]
used in decision making process here we
have a 4x4 matrix as we have four
[143]
criteria that is price, storage space,
camera and looks we will have a 4x4
[149]
matrix the value in the pairwise
matrix depend upon the decision maker
[156]
or the person who want to buy the mobile
phone what will be the value of this cell
[163]
for that some question should be
asked to the person who is buying the
[170]
mobile phone
how important is price or cost with
[175]
respect to storage space for a person
like me price of cost is of a strong
[182]
importance than storage space if storage
space is given X value then price or
[190]
cost will be given 5X value we can see
here that for strong importance a value
[197]
of 5 is given now next what we have to
do, we have to divide the row element by
[206]
the column element now here price is the
row element and storage space is a
[210]
column element the storage space has
became an x value and price as 5x so
[217]
here the value will be 5X divided by X
which is equivalent to 5 here storage
[224]
space is given X value and price 5X so
it will give 1/5.
[230]
For this particular
[232]
cell the question asked should be how
important is price or cost with respect
[238]
to camera price or cost is of moderate
to strong importance than camera so if
[245]
camera is given X value, price and cost
will be given 4X value so we can also
[252]
take anything in intermediate between 3
& 5 that is of 4 importance that is
[261]
moderate to strong importance will be
assigned a 4 value similarly we can
[268]
see here camera to price will be given
1/4 value. Now how important is
[279]
camera with respect to storage space
camera is of equal to moderate
[284]
importance than storage space so if
camera is given 2X value storage
[290]
space will be given X value so here we
will get a value of 2 well vice versa
[301]
storage to camera will be given 1/2 value similarly we can assign values
[307]
to each cell you can see that the
diagonal elements takes a value of one
[315]
because price will be of equal
importance to price. The fractional value
[323]
has been converted to decimal value and
the sum of each value is calculated that
[329]
is 1 + 0.2 + 0.25 + 0.14 will
give 1.59.
[341]
Normalized
[342]
pairwise matrix is calculated all the
elements of the column is divided by the
[348]
sum of the column here we can see that
one is divided by one point five nine
[354]
point two is divided by one point five
nine and so on this is the normalized
[361]
pairwise matrix, here I have calculated
the criteria weights, the weights are
[369]
calculated by averaging all the elements
in the row we have just added all these
[376]
elements and divided it with the number
of criteria which will give the criteria
[383]
of weight next step is calculating the
consistency that is to check whether the
[391]
calculated value are correct or not
for this I have taken the same pairwise
[397]
comparison matrix which is not
normalized I have multiplied each value
[405]
in the column with the criteria value so
here you can see that one has been
[411]
multiplied by the criteria weight that
is 0.6038
[415]
similarly 0.2 is the multiplied
with the criteria 0.6038
[421]
similarly I have done it for
all other values,
[431]
on solving we get this
[433]
matrix the weighted sum value is
calculated by taking the sum of each
[441]
value in the row so we you can see that
by adding all this term we will get the
[448]
weighted sum value just I have written
the criteria weight next to the weighted
[455]
sum value, next we calculate this ratio
of weighted sum value and criteria
[463]
weight now we calculate it for each row
on solving we get this value now lambda
[475]
max is calculated by taking the average
of all these values next we calculate
[483]
the consistency index CI which is given
by the formula lambda max minus n upon n
[490]
minus 1 in this example n is 4 as we
have four criteria finally we calculate
[499]
the consistency ratio which is given by
dividing the consistency index with
[505]
random index (RI) random index is the
consistency index of randomly generated
[513]
pairwise matrix I have shown the random
index table for up to 10 criteria in our
[521]
example the random index for n equal to
4 is
[527]
0.90 so have just
calculated the consistency ratio since
[534]
the value of consistency ratio CR is
0.037311
[540]
for the proportion of inconsistency
CR is less than 0.10
[547]
which is the standard we can assume that
our metrics is reasonably consistent so
[554]
we may continue with the process of
decision making using AHP based on the
[560]
requirement of buyer
these criteria weights can be used by
[564]
the decision maker for further
calculation so you can see here that
[568]
price has been given 60 percent weighted
storage space 13.65
[575]
percent weight-age camera 19.58 percent and looks a
[581]
weight-age of 6.46 percent
thank you and have a nice day
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





