Under Armour Ready to Issue Its New Class of Shares - YouTube

Channel: The Motley Fool

[0]
Sean O鈥橰eilly: I don't want to call them shenanigans, but what's going on with
[4]
Under Armour and this here stock split?
[6]
Vincent Shen: Sure. This news has been going through development, so to speak, for the
[14]
past six months or so. So keep in mind that Under Armour originally announced plans for
[20]
a stock split, it was last June. The delay happened due to a class action lawsuit that
[27]
was filed by some shareholders, due to the way that they had structured the split. To
[35]
give you more of that background, currently there exists two classes of shares, Class
[39]
A and Class B. There's about 183 million shares outstanding for Class A, and about 34.45 million
[49]
of the Class B.
[50]
What makes them different? Class A shares, you get one vote per share, Class B you get
[54]
10 votes per share. The Class B shares, not surprisingly, are all owned by CEO and founder
[61]
Kevin Plank and his family. A big part of that, in the way it is set up that way, is
[67]
because Plank wants to maintain control of the company he started, and it is understandable.
[73]
This is not uncommon among companies where you had this one guy really leading the vision,
[80]
and who has undoubtedly taken this company to a level of success that is truly incredible.
[90]
The company has gone through previous stock splits, so I think it was, let me find the
[95]
dates here, in July 2012 and April 2014, they actually did a traditional split where for
[101]
every share, Class A share, Class B share you had, you were getting one additional.
[106]
Standard, two for one stock split.
[109]
This one's unique in that, for every Class A and B share you own, you're getting a new
[115]
class, Class C shares. One share of Class C, and these Class C shares have no voting
[123]
rights. The idea behind this, and the reason why it was controversial, and why there was
[127]
a class action suit filed, is just because it kind of solidifies control that Plank has,
[133]
in terms of those voting rights. It allows him to sell some of his holdings without diluting them.
[139]
O鈥橰eilly: I'm kind of surprised he's that paranoid about losing control. To my knowledge,
[146]
there's never been an assault on his leadership. The company's doing extremely well, so ...
[151]
Shen: Just to give you an idea, based on those numbers right now, those voting rights were
[157]
a core issue, and the thing is he controls about two thirds, I think it's about 66% of
[161]
the voting rights due to his Class B shares, and that gives him the power to elect the
[168]
Board of Directors, and a lot of other ... like the governance issues. That's obviously important
[174]
to him. As I mentioned, Plank can sell some of his holdings now, through those Class C
[181]
shares that he receives, and not worry about losing some of that control.
[186]
O鈥橰eilly: Voting rights, Yeah.
[188]
Shen: The class action suit was filed, and they've gone through some iterations, and
[194]
basically come to this agreement to allow the split to still take place with key terms...
[200]
O鈥橰eilly: So he won. I mean, bottom line.
[203]
Shen: Yes, but there were some stipulations that came out. For example, there's a special
[207]
dividend that's going to Class C shareholders, because the fact is, you have your Class A
[212]
shares trading under the ticker symbol UA. These Class C shares are going to trade separately
[217]
under UA.C. It's expected that, because they don't have voting rights, that some of that value ...
[223]
O鈥橰eilly: Little bit of a discount. Yeah.
[224]
Shen: There's going to be a discount, and so that is a, going to be a one-time special
[228]
dividend to Class C shareholders in the amount of $59 million, to compensate for that initial
[233]
discount. There's also going to be, there's basically a strengthening of some of the non-compete
[238]
clause, with the CEO, that he has to devote enough time to his role as a CEO, and this
[247]
is on top of the fact that if he ever left the company, for example, he can't join any
[253]
business venture ... O鈥橰eilly: He can't go work at Nike.
[255]
Shen: That wouldn't be for about five years.
[257]
O鈥橰eilly: Okay.
[258]
Shen: Then, also, if there's any major transactions that may involve the issuance of Class C shares
[263]
as potential compensation for an M&A deal for example, the Board of Directors has to
[269]
go through a special review to see how that will impact Class A shareholders, and also
[274]
the company overall. Basically, it's like a watchdog system, to make sure that there's
[282]
nothing with the issuance of these Class C shares, these other shareholders besides Plank
[288]
aren't losing out in some way.