Ep 23- Keep An Eye on the Doctor Vaccine Kickbacks- [My Incredible Opinion] - YouTube

Ever wonder why doctors are so pro-vaccine? Wonder why health insurance companies are too?

I'm Forrest Maready and this is my Incredible Opinion.

Health insurance companies are in the business of keeping people healthy. You pay for a safety

net that might help you if you get very sick. If you stay healthy, and don't need doctor

visits and pharmaceuticals, then they make a profit. If you're sick, visit the doctors

frequently and have 8 prescription medications you're on for years at a time, then let's

just say you're probably not their favorite customer.

I'm completely fine with health insurance companies profiting from our good health.

I think profit is an incredible motivator to help people make good choices about their

families well being. Insurance companies employ people called actuaries, who's job it is to

use statistical modeling, fancy spreadsheets to figure out who and what are most likely

to cost and save them money. If you're a person who is at a high risk for disease and medication,

you will probably cost them money. The actuaries pour through data looking for trends and signals

of what lifestyles might help or hurt their bottom line. Once they identify them, they

can target those people and lifestyles through advertising, consumer awareness and physician

kickbacks, or incentives. If they can get people healthier, they make more money.

I want to talk about Physician kickbacks for a moment, because I think of these as the

canary in the coalmine. I think kickbacks will be one place you might first see the

tide turning against the vaccination insanity we're currently experiencing. Insurance companies

reward doctors for being proactive about their patient's health. Doctors make more money

when people are sick, and insurance companies lose money when people are sick, so insurance

companies have to incentivize doctors into looking after their patient's health, rather

than sickness. I know, I know. Doctors are not evil Nazis trying to kill their patients.

No conspiracy theories here, but in a system that favors profit (which I have no problem

with), mistakes will be made, as they say. It's inevitable. So insurance companies cut

a deal with doctors- I'll pay you X amount of dollars if you try to get this guy to lose

weight, or this gal to quit smoking, or get this guy to lower his blood pressure. And

so on. That X amount of dollars has to be just high enough that it's financially worth

it to the doctor to see less sick patients, and still allow the insurance company to make

a profit. Emotionally, these kickbacks are great for doctors, because they absolve their guilt

from encouraging sickness.

There are quite a few kickbacks doctors get from insurance companies if they play by the

rules. I have no problem with this concept- it's the free market working for everyone's

benefit. As long as the incentive is good health, the system will work to everyone's

advantage. If it becomes more profitable for people to be sick than healthy, then we have

a problem. If we have doctors getting massive kickbacks on chemotherapy for instance, then inevitably

cancer diagnoses will increase. Again- no evil Nazi's required. It's a predictable consequence

of a system where sickness is the incentive. If the sickness is not actually there, i.e.,

if we're not positive it's cancer, we can still diagnose it as such and get the reward.

No harm. No foul, right? Because chemotherapy, like vaccines are completely harmless. They're

just like more expensive aspirin, right?

Here's a look at a Blue Cross Blue Shield Incentive program. There are programs for

smoking cessation, diabetes management, weight management, and you can guess there is certainly

a large benefit for vaccinations. $400 per child if they meet certain immunization criteria.

I'm not sure how many kids a pediatric practice might see in a year, but I'm guessing this

particular kickback, excuse me, incentive, is large enough to buy them a new boat.

I'll link to the doc in the comments, but you can see why doctors push some of the more obscure

vaccines that parents typically don't care about. 2 Influenza vaccines by the time they're

2 years old? 2 or 3 Rotavirus shots? 3 Hepatitis B shots? For something that crack whores and

prostitutes get? This is stuff parents just don't care about much, but you can guarantee the doctor and

other staff will put extra effort in to because they'll get $400 for every kid they can get

over the hump. If you work as a nurse at a pediatric office, I'd love to see some those

pep-rally emails they send out to try and get you excited about pushing these completely unnecessary

vaccines, anonymity guaranteed. Free trips to the Bahamas, I'm guessing, if they can

hit the 63% mark? Or is it Las Vegas this year? Come on, send them in.

If the Affordable Care Act dies a spectacular death, which appears to be happening right

now, I'm guessing that the snowflake saviors of the world are going to swoop in and cry

that privatized health care has failed us, and that we must have a government and/or

socialized health care system to save the day. If you think a pharma controlled health

care system is bad, just wait. As Thomas Sowell said, "it's hard to imagine a more stupid

or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands

of people who pay no price for being wrong." If you value medical freedom, informed consent

and the ability to make your own decisions about whether you want to inject your children

with genetically modified disease or not, I'd think twice about supporting a government

run healthcare system. If you'd prefer to see a Well-Visit car on your driveway because

you skipped your 19th Tetanus booster, then by all means, hand the keys over.

If the vaccines actually made the kids healthier, and saved the health insurance companies money,

then I can see why this particular kickback is in effect. But what happens if insurance

companies have to work harder to be profitable? What happens if the actuaries start doing

the math, which I'm assuming they're beginning to right now, and start to say- Hey Guys, the unvaccinated

families on our schedule are costing 50% less than the others- They don't seem to have as

much autism, they don't have chronic disease, and they're certainly not coked up on the

Percocet like the other guys are. The actuaries are statisticians, math wizards who won't

have the same motivations that a future Pharma, Inc. VP at the CDC will have. They will see

things clearly, and with little bias.

I'm not sure if you've seen the studies, but they're out there, and show that unvaccinated

children are clearly healthier than the vaccinated. It's a stark contrast. I think the insurance

companies are going to start realizing that vaccinated individuals cost much more money,

and if the insurance companies are allowed to remain privatized, and if they are forced

to remain profitable, you may start to see these immunization kickbacks begin to disappear.

I'm sure that the pharmaceutical companies, who don't profit from health, but from sickness,

will kill some discounts and make the insurance companies suffer for promoting their customers

well-being. But it'll be too much. The insurance companies will see that they are making a

killing on the unvaccinated families and they won't care. They will start courting us openly,

advertising on shows like this, knowing that we are more proactive about our health than

pharma-friendly families. They will see that we have less chronic illness than the others,

and that we turn to the pills as a last resort rather than a first.

If you see the insurance companies make a turn on vaccinations, you'll see it first

in these Doctor incentive programs. They may not state it publicly, but they are the only

ones who are honestly looking at the long term costs of the vaccinated versus the not.

I'm confident they'll see the stark difference in health and well-being. And I'm confident

that we'll become their new best customers. And that is my incredible opinion.