馃攳
What's the Fastest way to Mine in Minecraft? - YouTube
Channel: Mumbo Jumbo
[0]
*Intro music*
[0]
Now as you guys may or may not know,
[1]
recently I did a video to take a look at the fastest way to place blocks in Minecraft,
[5]
if you haven't seen that before then
[6]
I'll put a link to that one on the screen and also down in the description.
[9]
But, I have to say the results for that one
[11]
were a massive suprise, I was totally expecting a different set of results
[14]
so it really caught me off guard and that got me thinking
[17]
What if the way that i have been mining blocks has also
[19]
Been very inefficent so I came up with a few different methods
[23]
And we're going to be putting all of them to the test in today's video
[27]
I think it's going to be fairly interesting, so let's crack up.
[30]
So this is how it's going to be:
[30]
In front of me, I've got a twenty by twenty by four area
[33]
And when I hit this button down here,
[34]
This space will fill in with stone.
[36]
Now, for each one of the tests we're going to be using the haste 2 beacon,
[39]
coupled with an efficiency 5 pickaxe
[41]
to give us an instant-mining set up
[43]
and that is because, we're not going to be testing out different ways to mine,
[46]
for example: haste 2, TNT, auto-mining quarries and that sort of thing,
[51]
simply because, I've done a video like that before!
[52]
If you want to see that one, there'll be a link to that one down in the description.
[55]
But in this video, we're going to be taking a look at actual mining techniques,
[59]
the way that you go about breaking the blocks.
[61]
So, for example, going across in one wide strips,
[64]
going across in three wide strips,
[66]
spiraling around, taking out, four-high areas, three-high areas, two-high areas,
[70]
we just want to work out if certain ways of mining are considerably faster than others.
[75]
So the first technique that I decided to try out
[77]
is mining a two-high area, that is one block wide.
[80]
Now I'm zipping back and forth throughout the platform,
[83]
and then, when I reach the end of the first two layers, I drop down to the bottom two layers,
[87]
and do exactly the same thing across the bottom.
[90]
Now I have to say, I expected this method to be really, very fast.
[93]
I expected it to be quick because, obviously, you can run, that's a really good start,
[97]
you can break blocks really nice and quickly, in fact you barely have to move your mouse
[101]
because of the way you angle it.
[102]
So, I thought that because you're spending most of your time breaking the blocks,
[106]
this would actually be a really quick method, but it turns out.. it's a tiny bit on the slow side.
[110]
To take out the entire twenty by twenty by four area, it took three minute and twenty seven seconds
[116]
while using the efficiency 5 pickaxe and the haste 2 beacon.
[120]
So then I thought to myself "Well I'll stick with the one-way theme, but this time,
[123]
I'll take out a four-high area, as apposed to taking out a two high area."
[127]
So, I started mining across, and instantly I noticed that this technique was a lot faster.
[131]
Although I can't sprint anymore, I can break the blocks quite a lot quicker,
[135]
because I can just nod my head up and down, and because we've got instant-mine,
[139]
it just blasts through all of the blocks as fast as possible.
[141]
So I was bobbing back and forth, obviously feeling a little bit ill at this point in time
[145]
with all the head shaking that's going on, but by the end
[148]
I cleared the full twenty by twenty by four area
[151]
in just three minutes.
[152]
Now that's twenty-seven seconds faster than mining a two-high by one wide space.
[158]
That is a considerable improvement!
[160]
It's massive!
[161]
So already, I've learned something new. I wouldn't originally mine out a four-high area like that,
[166]
but clearly, it's actually a really quick method of doing things.
[169]
So now I thought to myself "Forget the whole two-high action stuff,
[173]
because the two-high stuff is clearly much slower than the four-high stuff,
[177]
How about we take a look at mining a four-high area that is also three blocks wide."
[182]
So I take out a four by three area every single time I go across, and then I make my way back
[187]
go across the platform and basically go back and forth just like that.
[191]
Now once again, there was a considerable improvement here.
[194]
As soon as I started breaking the blocks I just noticed that I was making a lot more progress
[198]
than I would have done zipping back and forth, and that's quite simple because
[202]
you don't have to make as many turns at the end.
[203]
The idea behind these mining techniques is to spend as much time as possible breaking blocks,
[208]
and if you're wasting time turning around and not breaking any blocks,
[212]
then, well, you've wasted time! And that makes an inefficient mining technique.
[215]
So this time, we managed to take out the full area in just two minutes and twenty seconds,
[221]
a forty second improve upon the previous method, which was already considerably faster than the first method.
[228]
We've saved over a minute in total so far, which I would say, is a pretty good gain in terms of efficiency.
[234]
Next up we're going to be using a technique that I personally haven ever used before,
[237]
but I've been seeing a ton down in the comments section and that is the spiral method.
[242]
So what you do, is you start on the outside and you mine around, until eventually you reach the middle,
[247]
and once you do reach the middle, you've mined out all the blocks!
[249]
Now we're going to be taking out the blocks in a four by three area,
[252]
because that seems otherwise the most efficient way of doing things,
[254]
and I have to say I actually thought this was the fastest.
[258]
As I was doing it, it felt like a really quick method, and I think that's because you start with the long bit,
[263]
and then gradually it takes less and less time to take out all the blocks.
[267]
so you get this impression that things are speeding up,
[269]
when in reality you're just clearing out less blocks each time
[272]
But in total it took two minutes and twenty-five seconds to clear out the entire space,
[277]
so it's five seconds slower than the previous design and that can be put down to a number of different factors,
[282]
maybe they'd be closer or further apart on different tests, but I'd put them on a very similar level.
[288]
So, both of these techniques seem like a pretty good way to go.
[290]
Now this, this one is probably one of my favorite techniques,
[293]
and that is to swing your pickaxe aimlessly while you hit as many blocks as you possibly can technique.
[298]
So, once again, we're going to be taking out a four-high area right here,
[302]
and all you have to do, is you have to point your pickaxe in a certain direction,
[305]
and then start going crazy with the mouse while holding down the left click button.
[309]
Now unfortunately this only works with efficiency 5 and haste 2, because you have to have instant-mine,
[314]
otherwise you're not going to be breaking any of the blocks you go past,
[317]
whereas with instant-mine, just wherever you swing your pickaxe you break up every single block,
[322]
whatever path you travel on!
[324]
So, you can just go crazy with the mouse and just break everything in front of you,
[327]
and it turns out, that going crazy with the mouse is actually a really fast way of breaking blocks.
[332]
Once again, we managed to do this entire thing in two minutes and twenty seconds.
[337]
So, it makes it identical to taking out blocks in a four by three area,
[340]
and it puts it on par with taking out blocks in a four by three area and doing it in the spiral formation.
[346]
So considering there is absolutely no technique to this one, I would say that was a pretty good go.
[350]
Now I'l be honest, I was planning on ending the video there.
[353]
I was going to say don't mine out a two-high area, because that's not particularly efficient,
[357]
don't mine out a one-wide area, because, once again, that's not particularly efficient.
[361]
I would suggest mining out a four by three area, either going back and forth or in spirals,
[366]
or, if you really want to, you can just be completely random and swing your pickaxe all over the place.
[371]
That was going to be my official conclusion of the video, but then I thought to myself
[375]
"Well hang on a minute, two blocks high has got itself a time, and four blocks high has got itself a time,
[382]
but we haven't measured three blocks high.
[385]
What if there is an optimum at three blocks high?"
[387]
So I decided to change up my experiment just a tiny bit, if we hit this button over here,
[392]
we get ourselves a twenty by twenty by three area, and then what we're going to have to do
[397]
is a tiny bit of multiplication of the time at the end here to get ourselves an official result.
[401]
So I thought what I'd do is bring forth some of the fastest methods from the previous set of methods,
[406]
and try them out on the new three-high area.
[408]
So one of my personal favorites was taking out the four by three area,
[411]
this time we're going to be taking out a three by three area, and while I was doing it,
[415]
I thought to myself that this thing is really fast.
[418]
I mean, I was amazed at how quick it was going, but then I thought
[421]
"Well I'm only taking out three quarters of the blocks, so I suppose it's going to feel a lot faster."
[426]
But no, it turns out that it is just considerably faster.
[429]
In total, it took one minute and thirty-five seconds to clear out the entire space of blocks,
[435]
but of course then we had to do a tiny bit of math, and that works out at two minutes and seven seconds
[441]
to clear out the equivalent number of blocks that we use for the previous tests.
[445]
Two minutes and seven seconds! So that is thirteen seconds faster than the previous methods,
[450]
which I would say is a pretty good start.
[452]
But as I'm sure you remember there was also another method in the previous set of methods
[457]
that I personally, absolutely love, that was also completely equal
[461]
with the taking out of the four by three area, and that is to swing your pickaxe randomly.
[465]
Now I would say that random has a bit of an advantage in the three-high zone,
[470]
because three blocks high is sorta in your swinging space.
[473]
When it was four blocks high, occasionally I'd miss blocks and I'd have to go back
[476]
and take those out.
[477]
With the three high space that totally wasn't the case.
[480]
Everything was in reach, I would just swing my pickaxe like a madman,
[483]
and I'd be able to chew through all of the blocks really, really quickly,
[487]
and I guess I was correct in thinking that, because the time... the time is completely ridiculous.
[494]
It took one minute and thirty seconds.
[497]
One minute and thirty seconds to clear out all of the blocks in that area right there.
[501]
So, once we've done all of our mathematics and things, we end up with a time of two minutes in total.
[507]
Two minutes to clear out the equivalent number of blocks from the previous tests.
[511]
Now that's twenty seconds faster than the fastest methods from the previous tests,
[515]
but most importantly, it's one minute and twenty seven seconds faster than the first method that we tried out!
[522]
So that just shows that your mining technique makes a massive difference,
[526]
far more of a difference than I was expecting.
[528]
I was only expecting like a fifteen seconds difference between the fastest and the slowest.
[533]
One minute and twenty seven seconds, that is substantial.
[536]
So here are the results ordered from slowest through to fastest.
[540]
So, the slowest technique was to mine out a two high by one wide area.
[544]
That took three minutes and twenty seven seconds.
[546]
Then to clear a four-high by one-wide area it took three minutes.
[550]
To do a four by three space in a spiral formation it took two minutes and twenty-five seconds.
[557]
Then, to do a four by three area going back and forth like this it took two minutes and twenty seconds.
[562]
To do it completely randomly in a four-high space it took two minutes and twenty seconds once again.
[567]
Then, to clear out a three by three area, it took two minutes and seven seconds to clear out all the blocks.
[574]
And, the fastest method was actually to randomly break all of the blocks in a three high space,
[580]
taking just two minutes to clear out all of the blocks.
[583]
So we have it guys! I hope that you found this video useful.
[586]
I know that the results have been very surprising for me.
[589]
If you did enjoy this video, please be sure to hit that like button,
[591]
and if you really loved it then make sure to subscribe, but thanks for watching guys!
[594]
This has been Mumbo, and I'll see you later.
[596]
*outro music*
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





