Billions Stolen From Black Families by Predatory Lending - YouTube

Channel: The Real News Network

[4]
Welcome to The Real News Network.
[5]
I’m Marc Steiner.
[6]
It’s great to have you all with us.
[8]
As many of you know, we broadcast from Baltimore, Maryland.
[11]
One of our most heinous legacies is that this is a city that gave birth to what is known
[15]
as redlining— intentionally and legally segregating neighborhoods and steering African
[19]
Americans to buy homes in those neighborhoods at exorbitant prices through lending contracts,
[25]
not federally secure mortgages, so you could never really own the home.
[29]
You’ll be in debt forever and can’t create wealth, though it created wealth in the white
[33]
world and increased poverty in the black world.
[36]
A group of researchers at the Samuel Dubois Cooke Center for Social Equity produced a
[40]
report about redlining and the seriousness of its consequences.
[44]
The report’s entitled The Plunder of Black Wealth in Chicago: New Findings on The Lasting
[49]
Toll of Predatory Housing Contracts.
[51]
It not only tells the history but details its consequences and its financial toll.
[56]
It’s part and parcel of the underpinning for many of the arguments on reparations and
[60]
I hope this is just the beginning of our conversations about this report and similar things in the
[65]
coming months.
[66]
The study was brought to our attention by our guest today, Bill Black, who is Associate
[69]
Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri Kansas City, white-collar criminologist,
[74]
former financial regulator, author of The Best Way to Rob A Bank is to Own One, and,
[79]
of course, a regular contributor here at The Real News.
[82]
Bill, welcome back.
[83]
Good to have you with us, as always.
[85]
Thank you.
[86]
So this report is pretty stunning— both in terms of history, which I think I’m going
[91]
to give more details to the history that maybe some of us knew because of their research,
[96]
but I think the real importance of this work is to show its consequences.
[99]
Talk about this because this happens across the country.
[102]
I always feel there’s a synergy between Baltimore and Chicago— one’s large, one’s
[106]
small, but have a really similar history.
[108]
So go to the heart of why you thought this is such an important report.
[112]
Yeah.
[113]
So this is important in essentially every metropolitan area that had any meaningful
[122]
black population.
[125]
Redlining may have begun in Baltimore, but it was a nationwide phenomenon.
[130]
It was introduced by the US government.
[134]
It gets its name because literally they would draw with a red pen on a map and not loan,
[143]
or not provide a federal mortgage protection to any mortgages issued in that portion of
[155]
the city.
[156]
What it was particularly aimed at was not neighborhoods that were already majority or
[163]
almost exclusively black, but any change from an area that used to be overwhelmingly white
[173]
to an area that was desegregated.
[177]
The theory of this was, oh my god, prices will collapse because of white racism.
[185]
If somebody who is black moves into the neighborhood and we, the federal government, are guaranteeing
[192]
the lenders against losses, the lenders will suffer significant losses, they’ll pass
[197]
them on to us.
[199]
And so, you know, we don’t have anything against blacks.
[202]
We just don’t want to lose money, and we realize that many whites are racist, so this
[207]
is how we’re going to protect ourselves.
[209]
But the reality is that this is in many ways, when you look at the history of this, this
[215]
was really a conspiracy in many ways involving the Federal Reserve, involving the federal
[220]
government, involving people who sold real estate, and, you know, they did hate black
[225]
people.
[226]
I mean, they really disliked black folks and that was pretty clear to me that these were
[228]
not do-gooders trying to help the world, and they were— [laughs].
[234]
Right?
[236]
[laughs] In fairness, they never claimed to be do-gooders to protect the world, but yes,
[246]
there’s a very good book, a little dated now— American Apartheid.
[251]
Yes.
[252]
It is filled with this history and a number of the consequences, but this study says,
[259]
okay, what kind of predation occurred taking advantage of this redlining.
[267]
All right.
[268]
And economists are finally starting to take predation seriously.
[276]
Predation is where you do something that is incredibly slimy, but you have the political
[281]
juice that it’s never defined as criminal.
[285]
All right.
[286]
Predation in this sphere is not something that is less nasty than a crime, it’s more
[293]
nasty.
[294]
It’s both the actions that are substantively equivalent to crimes, and the political juice
[301]
to be able to do it with absolute impunity.
[306]
This is an area where in Chicago—The reason this article and this study exists is because
[312]
blacks fought back, and they fought back twice with lawsuits.
[317]
Now, they lost, but they, in the course of creating those lawsuits, they created what
[324]
is now a database that researchers could go and see what happened to the people who were
[331]
subjected to these land contracts.
[334]
What’s a land contract?
[335]
All right.
[336]
It isn’t that you will never own, it’s that you are very unlikely to ever own, and
[345]
you will also pay enormously more.
[349]
Here is first the economics and then, how it fits with the law.
[352]
The economics were that when blacks would first move into a neighborhood that was overwhelmingly
[359]
white because of white racism and white flight, housing prices would fall sharply, but that
[367]
was a very short-term phenomenon.
[370]
Over any medium to long-term, prices typically recovered, but that meant that sleazy developers
[379]
could buy up homes and they would go in and they would stir up white racism and fear.
[388]
Oh, your property values are going to collapse.
[391]
Let us buy your home now while you can still get 70 cents on the dollar and many, many
[397]
white householders would sell.
[399]
They would, these sleazy developers that were called blockbusters in my day, would be able
[407]
to buy the properties at maybe 50 to 70 cents on the dollar.
[412]
They would then turn around, because it was more difficult because of all this redlining
[418]
for blacks to be able to get homes in areas they preferred, and be able to charge a premium
[424]
price.
[426]
All right.
[428]
The increase in home prices over what they purchased was often in the magnitude of 80
[435]
percent.
[436]
In other words, these guys are basically flipping houses, right, with a huge margin.
[443]
On top of that, because you couldn’t get the FHA insurance— that’s what we’ve
[449]
been talking about— you would not make a conventional sale of the home to the black
[457]
family.
[458]
You would make this contract of sale and that contract of sale was really pernicious.
[467]
In addition to being massively overpriced, the typical contract said, if you miss any
[474]
payment, you lose everything.
[477]
You don’t build up equity as you make your monthly payments.
[483]
It’s just a contract.
[485]
So unless and until you pay every single one, and you never have a single month where you
[492]
can’t pay because, you know, you had to repair the car or the kids had an emergency
[498]
visit to the hospital, and so you’re late paying.
[501]
Boom.
[502]
Your entire equity could be gone in the home, so this is just absolutely, quintessential
[510]
predation.
[511]
It was massively profitable for the real estate developers.
[515]
The real estate developers were almost exclusively white.
[519]
And so, this was a direct transfer from black people to white people and it was done in
[527]
an utterly outrageous fashion.
[530]
Even when blacks fought back, organized leagues against this, brought civil suits, they lost
[537]
those civil suits in the courts because there was no effective justice for predation.
[544]
That, by the way, is why Elizabeth Warren tried to create the Consumer Financial Protection
[550]
Bureau— to finally have some kind of body that would protect us against predatory finance.
[559]
You can see that became an absolute top priority of the Trump administration to destroy.
[568]
No accidents there either and I think that if you look at the map that’s in this report,
[571]
I mean, literally these red zones were hazardous areas.
[576]
They put them where they did not want people to move to— white people to move to— and
[580]
where they saw the investments happening.
[581]
I mean, literally, when you look at the maps, you see how they divided up the city.
[586]
One of the really interesting things— And the cities are divided up even today along
[591]
lines that are very recognizable from the maps of literally 70 years ago.
[597]
Yes.
[598]
And that’s why these kinds of historic roots are important.
[599]
There’s this one graph in there which says a great deal, this graph that was in the document
[600]
about where the wealth is now.
[601]
So, I mean, one of the things that’s referred to in this report is this really interesting
[602]
graph from the part of the report that talks about how much money was lost in the black
[606]
community.
[607]
They’re talking about three to four billion dollars.
[610]
If you look at this graph here, that they called this as average race tax, sixty thousand
[618]
odd homes that— and you can explain what all this means— but we’re talking about
[624]
over $4 billion-worth of wealth that’s lost by the black world.
[628]
This is, I mean, we’re talking about this now in the midst of these reparations discussions
[632]
going on in Washington DC that Real News is also covering.
[637]
I mean, what we haven’t seen before is a report that actually details what that cost
[645]
has been to the black world.
[646]
Right.
[647]
And it wasn’t lost.
[649]
Of course, it was taken.
[650]
Taken.
[651]
Exactly, stolen.
[652]
Exactly, right.
[653]
Right.
[654]
[laughs] It was taken by white people.
[655]
It was reverse reparations.
[656]
So, yes.
[657]
Again, there are two big things happening.
[662]
One, is that they are selling the homes to blacks at inflated prices.
[670]
And two, they’re selling the homes in a manner where you often didn’t actually end
[676]
up with a home and often paid what should have been huge amounts of equity into the
[683]
home and lost all of it.
[686]
If you combine those two flows—And remember, we’re just talking about one city, albeit
[693]
a large city with a large black population, but also only a portion where we actually
[699]
knew the names to be able to study them because of this lawsuit.
[707]
The actual losses, even in Chicago, are dramatically larger than the 4 billion and the losses nationwide
[717]
to the black community— meaning, again, it’s not like you just lose the money in
[721]
a rathole; it’s going to rats who happened to be white— is going to be vastly larger
[730]
than that of some partial sum for Chicago.
[733]
And one of the things that is really important that you also said earlier on was that, you
[739]
know, people think often that there is no agency in communes of color and black communities
[745]
for the fight back in the past, when there always has been.
[748]
This report also outlines groups that actually took this on and fought it.
[752]
It wasn’t just—People were aware of it, but as you said, a lot of this was lost over
[757]
the years.
[758]
The facts were lost, and we really had to unearth this stuff because it was very difficult
[761]
to find the proof to it.
[762]
It just was not readily available.
[766]
Right and the fightback was at times when their actions were incredibly unpopular, where
[773]
they faced a judiciary that was pretty close to 100 percent white.
[781]
Where even getting lawyers to be able to bring the actions was difficult.
[787]
Where you faced immense hostility not just from the judiciary and of course the business
[795]
community, but also from the serious people in the newspapers and such.
[804]
So this was one of the absolute great scandals and, as I said, it absolutely has been determinative
[817]
of much of what you see today in the modern urban landscape in the United States in terms
[824]
of housing.
[825]
Finally, I’m just curious, you know, as somebody who’s spent a lot of time inside
[828]
of government and you know the workings of government very well.
[831]
I wonder what you think this portends in terms of all these things coming to light?
[836]
You know, the term “reparations” is not popular in much of the white world in this
[840]
country.
[841]
It’s really misunderstood, and people are still trying to wrestle with what the definition
[844]
of that means.
[845]
I’m curious what you think this sets up, I mean, when you’re talking about billions
[849]
of dollars in wealth stolen, and the conditions that so many people live in the poorest parts
[853]
of the black community in the inner cities of America, what do you think this allows
[857]
us to do?
[859]
What do we do with this information?
[860]
Well, first, we combine it with other information.
[864]
This is a very important part but remember, it’s part.
[868]
So there are also studies by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, a very conservative group
[875]
of economists, that finds that black and Hispanic households, where at least one member of the
[883]
household had at least a two-year associate degree, on average during the peak of the
[891]
great financial crisis— that 10 year-ish period— lost 80 percent of their wealth.
[898]
Now, the comparable figure for whites is under 30 percent.
[905]
There has been a catastrophic loss of black wealth, again, through systematic predation.
[913]
We actually have, in a number of cases, the business plans on how they deliberately targeted
[922]
not just blacks, but blacks, Latinos, and in particular, elderly black women for these
[929]
kinds of predatory lending scandals that led to the great financial crisis.
[935]
There’s another study that just came out the day we’re filming this that says, you
[941]
know, if you look 10 years after someone starts their college studies, the average student
[951]
will have paid off 60 percent of their debt.
[954]
Right.
[955]
So they’ll only have 40 percent of their debt left.
[959]
[laughs] You know, so this is of course absurd, scandalous, crazy, and self-destructive.
[965]
But on top of that, the comparable figure for black women is that they are a further
[973]
12 percent in debt than when they started with these loans.
[979]
Instead of saying, oh, you know, 100 cents on the dollar, they owe 112 cents on the dollar
[985]
for whatever the original amount that they borrowed.
[988]
What does that mean?
[989]
That means that many of these educational experiences, particularly for blacks, particularly
[996]
for blacks and Latinos, are in these for-profit schools.
[1002]
Well, these for-profit schools are immensely predatory, and they aim at minorities and
[1009]
they are front-to-back frauds in many cases.
[1013]
They leave you poorly-prepared for getting that job.
[1017]
They have terrible reputations for trying to get a job.
[1022]
After you do everything right— you scrimp, you save, you work all night.
[1027]
Now, you know, you work all day at a paying job, then you work at night to get your degree,
[1033]
and then, you know, you get married like they tell you to do, and then you buy a home like
[1037]
they tell you to do, right?
[1038]
This is the responsible thing to do.
[1041]
You know, have good, white, middle-class values and all that stuff.
[1047]
It’s precisely those folks that are getting it in the neck in the black community the
[1053]
most.
[1054]
Well, this, I hope, is just the beginning of this conversation in depth over the coming
[1059]
months.
[1060]
It’s really important and I’m really glad you brought this report to our attention.
[1062]
Bill, it’s always great to talk with you and I appreciate you being with us all the
[1066]
time, Bill Black.
[1067]
Thank you.
[1068]
And I’m Marc Steiner here for The Real News Network.
[1070]
Thank you all for joining us.
[1071]
We’ll continue this.
[1073]
Take care.