Jeff Bezos In 1999 On Amazon's Plans Before The Dotcom Crash - YouTube

Channel: CNBC

[0]
It doesn't matter to me whether we're a
[1]
pure internet play. What matters to me is
[2]
do we provide the best customer service.
[5]
Internet Shminternet
[31]
Given the decades of wisdom that has built up
[34]
in the business world investors, it sounds
[36]
like you're saying you're making a big
[38]
speculative bet, if they're investing in
[39]
your company's stock. Well I think all
[41]
Internet companies you know the stocks are
[43]
incredibly volatile...
[44]
But even long term.
[46]
Long term I believe. That
[50]
it's very easy to predict that there are
[52]
going to be lots of successful companies
[55]
born of the Internet. They're going to have
[57]
very large market caps and so on. I also
[60]
believe that today where we sit it's very
[62]
hard to predict who those companies are
[64]
going to be. So you know you can make bets
[67]
on these things and I think that Amazon.com
[69]
if we don't if we're not one of those
[71]
important lasting companies born of the
[74]
Internet we will have nobody to blame but
[76]
ourselves and we will be extremely
[78]
disappointed in ourselves. But there are no
[80]
guarantees. It's very very hard to predict.
[83]
If you go back and look at the companies
[85]
created by the P.C. revolution in 1980 you
[89]
wouldn't have predicted the five winners the
[92]
five biggest winners. There've been lots of
[94]
winners actually. So this space is a little
[96]
different and brand name may need may mean
[98]
more and then there's some increasing
[100]
returns kinds of things maybe more. But I
[103]
believe that if you can focus obsessively
[106]
enough on customer experience, selection,
[109]
ease of use, low prices, more information to
[112]
make purchase decisions with. If you can
[115]
give customers all that plus great customer
[118]
service and with our toys and electronics we
[121]
have a 30 day return policy. If you can do
[124]
all of that then I think you have a good
[126]
chance. And that's what we're trying to do.
[128]
You're not really a pure Internet company
[131]
anymore either. I mean you've got millions
[133]
of square feet now of real estate. You've
[135]
got a growing huge and growing inventory of
[139]
items with you keep in stock. You've got
[142]
thousands and thousands of employees now.
[144]
We have over 3000 employees and over four
[147]
million square feet of distribution center
[149]
space. And those are things I'm very very
[151]
proud of because with that distribution
[154]
center space and half a dozen distribution
[156]
centers around the country it allows us to
[158]
get product close to customers so that we
[160]
can ship it to customers in a very timely
[162]
way which improves customer service levels.
[165]
That's what we're about. If there's one
[166]
thing Amazon.com is about its obsessive
[169]
attention to the customer
[171]
experience, End to end. And that's what
[173]
those distribution centers.
[174]
But you're not a pure Internet play.
[175]
It doesn't. It doesn't matter to me whether
[177]
we're a pure Internet play it matters to me
[179]
is we provide the best customer service.
[181]
Internet Shminternet. It's that's you know
[183]
that doesn't matter.
[185]
Well but it does matter to your investors to
[187]
know whether they're investing in a company
[188]
that is...
[189]
No, they should be investing in a company
[191]
that obsesses over customer experience in
[193]
the long term. There is never any
[194]
misalignment between customer interests and
[197]
shareholder interests.
[197]
Well that's the same argument that somebody
[199]
at WalMart would make as well.
[201]
I don't see why not. I think they should make
[203]
that argument. So it's a correct argument.
[206]
OK.
[207]
So you'll open as many square feet of space
[210]
physical space as you have to hire as many
[212]
employees as you have to...
[214]
To service customers.
[215]
Absolutely. And we'll do it as rapidly as we
[218]
can.
[218]
That's a very cost intense proposition.
[222]
Not compared to opening an equivalent network
[225]
of retail stores.
[226]
So if you open a bunch of chain stores. Look
[228]
when we open a distribution center we're
[230]
opening places that may have square where we
[233]
may pay 30 cents a square foot for for a
[238]
lease instead of paying seven dollars a
[240]
square foot which you might pay in a high
[242]
traffic retail area. So when you compare
[245]
those things they're not the same. You can't
[247]
compare a big chain of of of of retail
[250]
stores to half a dozen distribution centers.
[253]
It's just not you know it's bad math.
[258]
Either way whichever side of the argument you
[261]
believe you're making what it seems to me.
[263]
There's only one side which is obsess over
[266]
customers.
[266]
But it seems to me that. Both with the speed
[269]
of your growth in terms of the number of
[270]
stores online that you're opening the
[273]
different businesses you're getting into the
[275]
number of distribution centers and you're
[276]
opening a new employees you're hiring
[279]
That you are making an intense gamble here
[282]
which is twofold. One that you can run this
[286]
number of businesses different businesses
[288]
well. And two that you can make money by
[293]
selling vast volumes of products and
[296]
essentially razor thin profit margins.
[299]
I think that the the first one in particular
[302]
I agree with wholeheartedly which is that
[304]
where
[305]
There there's no guarantee that Amazon.com
[308]
can be a successful company. What we're
[310]
trying to do is very complicated. There's
[313]
huge execution risk involved. We have a
[315]
terribly complicated business. We're
[317]
growing, you know, historically very
[319]
rapidly. We're opening new product
[323]
categories we're expanding in new
[324]
geographies. We have whole new business
[326]
models with things like auctions. Now we
[328]
think this is the less risky of the two
[330]
approaches because scale is important in
[333]
this business. And you need scale also to
[335]
offer the lowest prices and the best
[337]
customer service to people. So scale is
[341]
important to us and we're going to go after
[343]
that kind of scale. But it does mean that
[345]
the executional challenges are huge. And so
[348]
you'll find a bunch of people back in
[350]
Seattle and around the world working very
[352]
hard to make sure we service customers at
[354]
the level that they're used to. And then
[356]
even improving that.
[358]
Isn't it to some extent a certain amount
[361]
of, with all do respect,
[364]
corporate arrogance to assume that you can
[367]
come into these businesses which you have no
[369]
experience in and virtually overnight enter
[374]
a huge variety of different businesses and
[377]
become the best in those businesses and the
[380]
market leader in those businesses. There are
[382]
other companies that have been running these
[383]
types of businesses for decades if not more.
[386]
I don't think so. So you know when we first
[390]
started selling books four years ago we were
[393]
everybody said look you're just computer
[395]
guys you don't know anything about selling
[396]
books. And that was true. But what we really
[399]
cared about customers and now we know a lot
[401]
about books and when we first started
[403]
selling music people said the same thing but
[406]
we hired the right people. So we don't do
[408]
this in a vacuum. We go out and hire the
[410]
best industry experts in each of these
[413]
categories. That's the same with toys
[415]
electronics. So you know we take this very
[418]
seriously we take the commitment to the
[420]
customer very seriously and we're not about
[422]
to release something or announce something
[425]
before it's ready.