馃攳
Ask Prof Wolff: Supply vs Demand-Side Economics - YouTube
Channel: Democracy At Work
[5]
This is Richard Wolff from Democracy at Work聽
responding to another Ask Prof Wolff question聽聽
[12]
from our patreon.com community. And this one聽
comes from 'Jack H.' 'Jack' asks me to distinguish聽聽
[21]
between supply-side and demand-side economics.聽
What's going on? What do these terms mean? Well,聽聽
[30]
let me begin by making it very clear why I聽
chose to respond to this particular question聽聽
[36]
among the many that come in. Not only because聽
others have asked it too, but because it's a聽聽
[41]
wonderful example of language and words being used聽
to disguise or to hide what's actually going on.
[51]
So let's begin. 'Supply and demand' is a very聽
neutral set of words. It's a very neutral idea.聽聽
[58]
It's the way teachers describe to students聽
what economics is all about. There's the supply聽聽
[66]
on the one hand and the demand on the other.聽
Somebody supplies ice cream cones to the market聽聽
[72]
and other folks buy the ice cream cones. And聽
that's how things get produced and distributed.聽聽
[79]
Isn't it all reasonable. And nobody's聽
making hay at anyone else's expense.
[86]
The reality is far, far different. Yes,聽
there are markets all over the place. Yes,聽聽
[94]
there are supply sides to the market and demand聽
sides. Typically the supply side is the employer.聽聽
[102]
That is the person or group whose job it is聽
to produce and bring to the market the supply聽聽
[111]
of goods and services we find in a market. On聽
the other side are most of us: the demanders;聽聽
[119]
the people who need to buy the food, clothing,聽
and shelter without which we can't live. And聽聽
[125]
so we come to market prepared and interested in聽
buying. And markets bring suppliers and demanders聽聽
[133]
together. It would be a bit more honest聽
if we acknowledged that the supply-siders聽聽
[141]
are usually the businesses of聽
the country: the employers;聽聽
[145]
a class of people very different from those who聽
do not own and operate any enterprise. And who聽聽
[152]
are there mostly to demand to buy the things they聽
need for themselves and their families to live.
[160]
So what then is supplier demand economics? It's聽
usually a set of policies, a very clever language.聽聽
[168]
You call a set of policies, something聽
about the supply or the demand.聽聽
[174]
That seems sort of even-handed doesn't it? Well,聽
it isn't. Supply-side economics has a better,聽聽
[181]
more honest name. It's economics that聽
deals with problems of capitalism聽聽
[187]
by making sure you help, first and foremost,聽
the employer. Let me give you some examples.聽聽
[196]
When the economy of capitalism goes down (and聽
let's remember every four to seven years across聽聽
[202]
the history of capitalism on average there's been聽
a downturn, a recession, a depression, a crash,聽聽
[209]
a crisis - lots of words for it) and when聽
that happens the supply side people say聽聽
[215]
'oh my goodness, there's a crash, there's聽
unemployment, the economy is going down,聽聽
[220]
and we want there to be a policy which聽
we call supply-side economics.' You know聽聽
[226]
what it is? It's a set of policies that make聽
businesses more profitable. And here's the idea:聽聽
[234]
if we make the businesses more profitable they'll聽
expand, they'll grow, they'll hire more people,聽聽
[241]
and the benefits will - yeah, here we go - trickle聽
down to everybody else. Supply-side economics,聽聽
[249]
trickle down economics - very close聽
twins. It's a way of helping the supplier.
[256]
What's the alternative? More liberal type聽
folks want there to be demand-side policies,聽聽
[265]
demand-side economics. Here the idea is: you want聽
the economy to go better? Help the mass of people,聽聽
[272]
the working class, the employees; give them money,聽
give them benefits of all kinds, give them jobs to聽聽
[281]
earn money. And then they will go into the market聽
to buy things. And the benefit of that will,聽聽
[287]
yeah, trickle up to the businesses. Right-wingers聽
want supply-side economics because it favors the聽聽
[296]
employers they serve. Liberal or聽
left-wing economists tend to prefer聽聽
[301]
demand-side economics because it helps people who聽
are average and coming into market wanting to buy.
[311]
By the way, capitalism, being an unstable聽
system as it is, periodically has the opposite聽聽
[317]
problem. Instead of the economy going down, the聽
economy is sort of exploding, like it is today.聽聽
[323]
With prices going crazy. Here again the same game:聽
one set of policies wants to come in and leave the聽聽
[331]
employer class with the minimum of trouble.聽
They just want the Federal Reserve to raise聽聽
[336]
interest rates a little bit. Or to pull聽
a little bit of money out of the economy,聽聽
[341]
making it a little bit of pressure, a little聽
bit on the employer to do something about聽聽
[347]
the inflation. The Federal Reserve has been聽
raising interest rates, you probably noticed.聽聽
[352]
The impact on the inflation? nowhere to be seen.聽
Which is exactly what the employer class wants.
[359]
What would a liberal or left-wing approach聽
be? Go in there and do something that helps聽聽
[364]
average people: ration, wage/price聽
freezes (the government comes in,聽聽
[370]
controls, stops the prices from going up.) That's聽
the solution that the mass of Americans want right聽聽
[375]
now. But you won't hear about it. Because the聽
Democrats and Republicans are all lined up on聽聽
[380]
the conservative side. Which has been true now聽
for a long time, ever since Franklin Roosevelt.
[388]
Here's the conclusion to draw:聽
supply and demand never explain much.聽聽
[395]
That's part of why they are taught all the聽
time and emphasized. You know, businesses聽聽
[401]
have learned that if the supply goes down and the聽
demand goes up, up go their prices and profits聽聽
[407]
in most cases. So the businesses play both sides,聽
don't they? Advertising is the name of the game.聽聽
[415]
That's when businesses manipulate the demand.聽
And they control production. So they can control聽聽
[422]
the supply. In other words, in capitalism the聽
capitalist plays both sides. And that's what聽聽
[429]
has to be understood, because that's how they make聽
the system work for them. Markets, like supply and聽聽
[436]
demand, are an institution that serves capitalism.聽
And to believe in it, to take seriously the聽聽
[443]
language of supply and demand is to get caught up聽
in an ideology favoring one class against another.
[454]
If interventions like these strike you, as聽
they do us, important ways to shift and change聽聽
[460]
the conversation in our country then please聽
partner with us, share these videos with friends,聽聽
[467]
relatives, co-workers. Help us reach a larger聽
audience. And, of course, if you can be supportive聽聽
[475]
financially (all of this costs money) that will聽
be enormously appreciated as well. Thank you.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





