Decision Analysis 4 (Tree): EVSI - Expected Value of Sample Information - YouTube

Channel: Joshua Emmanuel

[0]
Welcome to this decision tree tutorial for Expected Value of Sample Information.
[6]
In this tutorial we’ll be constructing a decision tree with Sample Information.
[10]
We will also be calculating the Expected Value of Sample information.
[15]
We will be using this Payoff Table where Payoffs are Profits.
[19]
This is the decision tree for the payoff table. The expected value for Stocks is calculated
[26]
as 20.2, for Mutual Funds, it is 18.2,
[32]
and for bonds, it is 20. The best of the expected values is 20.2
[37]
Therefore, the decision is to invest in Stocks.
[42]
Now suppose there is an economic consultant that can provide additional information about
[48]
the states of nature (or outcomes). And this consultant has some success history.
[53]
We now have an additional decision situation. Should we hire this consultant or not?
[60]
If we don’t hire the consultant, we will stick to our initial decision to invest
[65]
in stocks. If we decide to hire the consultant,
[69]
then we will consider two factors: 1. How successful has the consultant’s information
[77]
been in the past? 2. How much does it cost to hire the consultant.
[83]
Here is a reduced version of our decision situation.
[87]
Now suppose, if we hire the consultant, he or she could give a positive report
[94]
or a negative report about economic conditions. These report from additional information is
[102]
often referred to as prediction, forecast, or result.
[108]
Suppose the probability of the consultant giving a positive report is 0.44.
[113]
This will mean that the probability of a negative report is 0.56.
[118]
Since these are probabilities, we represent them with a chance node
[122]
with positive and negative branches. Suppose given a positive report,
[129]
the probability of a Growing Economy is 0.59. And the probability of growth given a negative
[136]
report is 0.25. This means that the probability of decline
[141]
given positive report is 1 – 0.59 which is 0.41.
[146]
And the probability of decline given a negative report
[151]
is 1 – 0.25 which is 0.75. These probabilities are called posterior probabilities,
[158]
we will discuss them in detail in the next video.
[162]
So if the report is positive, we paste the original tree here
[166]
with the posterior probabilities, 0.59 and 0.41.
[170]
We do the same for negative report with posterior probabilities 0.25 and 0.75.
[179]
The chance nodes have now been labelled 1 to 5 here for reference purposes, as we calculate
[185]
the expected values: The Expected Value for node 1 is
[190]
0.59(70) + 0.41(-13) which equals 35.97. In similar fashion, we calculate the expected
[199]
values for node2, for node 3, and for node 4.
[205]
Now if the report is positive, the best expected value is 35.97 (from Stocks).
[214]
And if the consultant’s report is negative, the best expected value is 20 (from Bonds).
[223]
Next we calculate the expected value for node 5
[226]
which is 0.44(35.97) + 0.56(20) which gives 27.0268
[236]
The Expected Value of Sample information estimates the value of the information supplied by the
[242]
consultant. Sample information is also known as Imperfect
[247]
Information. So the Expected Value of Sample information,
[251]
EVSI is calculated as EV with SI – EV without SI
[258]
EV with SI is the Expected Value with Sample information.
[263]
That is, best expected payoff if the consultant is hired (without paying the consultant).
[268]
EVwithoutSI is the Expected Value without
[271]
Sample information. That is, the best expected payoff if the consultant
[276]
is not hired.
[277]
In this case, EV with SI is 27.0268 And EV without SI is 20.2
[285]
Therefore, EVSI is 27.0268 – 20.2 which gives 6.8268.
[295]
Now let’s see how to use the EVSI to determine the best decision strategy.
[302]
Suppose the cost to hire the consultant is 7.2
[305]
which is higher than EVSI. That is, the fee is higher than the value
[310]
added by the consultant. And so, the decision strategy will be not
[316]
to hire the consultant As a result, we will stick to our initial
[320]
decision and invest in Stocks.
[325]
On another note, suppose the consultant’s fee is 3.5.
[329]
which is less than EVSI. Then the strategy will be stated as follows:
[334]
Hire the consultant If the consultant’s report is positive,
[338]
invest in Stocks. If the consultant’s report is negative,
[343]
invest in Bonds.
[344]
And that’s how to calculate and use the EVSI to determine the best decision strategy.
[352]
Please post your comments below. Thanks for watching.
[354]
Bye for now.