BREAKING: Trump "Guilty of Numerous Felonies"..."Beyond Reasonable Doubt" - YouTube

Channel: David Pakman Show

[0]
Speaker 1: major breaking news. This this聽 is this is absolutely huge. The prosecutor,聽聽
[6]
who resigned recently from the Trump criminal聽 probe now says that Trump is guilty of numerous聽聽
[14]
felonies beyond a reasonable doubt. This is not聽 a I'm going to pat myself on the back story,聽聽
[21]
but it sort of is in the sense that when we聽 learned that these prosecutors resigned from聽聽
[28]
the Trump probe, right wingers everywhere were聽 saying they resigned because they realized it聽聽
[34]
was a witch hunt. And at the time, I said, there's聽 no evidence of that. And if we want to speculate,聽聽
[40]
it seems more plausible to me that the prosecutors聽 investigating Trump resigned because they realized聽聽
[47]
there's not actually any willingness to charge the聽 guy. And they found wrongdoing. That is exactly聽聽
[55]
what one of the prosecutors now says. This story聽 cannot be cannot be understated in its importance.聽聽
[62]
Former Manhattan prosecutor believed聽 Trump was guilty of numerous felonies.聽聽
[67]
One of the prosecutors, who had been leading聽 the Manhattan District Attorney's investigation聽聽
[72]
into former President Trump and the Trump聽 Organization, said in his resignation letter that聽聽
[76]
he believed Trump was quote guilty of numerous聽 felony violations, per the New York Times.聽聽
[82]
His financial statements were false, and he聽 has a long history of fabricating information聽聽
[87]
relating to his personal finances, lying聽 about his assets to banks, the national media,聽聽
[92]
counterparties and many others, including the聽 American people. This is Mark Pomerantz who wrote聽聽
[97]
this in his resignation letter. The team that has聽 been investigating Trump harbors no doubt about聽聽
[104]
whether he committed crimes. He did. I and others聽 have advised you that we have evidence sufficient聽聽
[111]
to establish Trump's guilt beyond a reasonable聽 doubt. And we believe that the prosecution聽聽
[117]
would prevail if charges were brought. And the聽 matter were tried to an impartial jury. No case is聽聽
[124]
perfect. Whatever the risks of bringing the case聽 may be, I am convinced that a failure to prosecute聽聽
[128]
will pose much greater risks in terms of public聽 confidence in the Fair Administration of Justice.聽聽
[134]
This is one of the biggest stories around聽 presidential wrongdoing and criminality in聽聽
[141]
decades in decades, and the right is ignoring聽 it. Pomerantz also expressed his concerns that聽聽
[147]
not proceeding would doom future efforts at聽 prosecuting Trump in related cases. Guys,聽聽
[153]
I hate to be, I know it sounds like I'm patting聽 myself on the back, but. They were just so wrong.聽聽
[162]
And my speculation turned out to be not just聽 pointing in the right direction. It is exactly聽聽
[170]
what Pomeranz is saying took place. This is聽 exactly what he says is going on. We suspected聽聽
[178]
there is serious hesitation from days to be聽 the first to prosecute a former president.聽聽
[186]
My prediction was if one prosecution went聽 forward, then a whole bunch of others would. But聽聽
[194]
who wants to be the first because admittedly聽 this is politically unstable ground?聽聽
[199]
And it is historically unstable ground, and it's a聽 big deal to charge a former president, I get that.聽聽
[206]
But my sense was that these investigators were聽 resigning, not because there was no evidence聽聽
[214]
and they were being forced to put together a聽 case against Trump. But my instinct was they're聽聽
[220]
resigning because they're they're realizing聽 their work is going to be put in the toilet聽聽
[225]
and flushed 10 to 15 times, as Donald Trump聽 likes to say. They were finding wrongdoing.聽聽
[233]
And these are extraordinarily strong words聽 guilt beyond a reasonable doubt that we聽聽
[238]
would be able to clearly establish in front of聽 a jury of the commission of multiple felonies.聽聽
[244]
When did we last hear prosecutor speak that聽 way about the actions of a sitting or former聽聽
[249]
sitting president? It is arguably unprecedented,聽 and they realize my boss isn't going to charge聽聽
[255]
Trump. He's not going to do it. So what聽 the hell am I doing here doing this work?聽聽
[259]
What we do know is they are hesitant about聽 charging Trump and that I understand that,聽聽
[266]
but we now know the real reason why聽 they resigned. And it is exactly exactly聽聽
[274]
what I suspected was going on. If there is a聽 miscarriage of justice here. It's that Trump聽聽
[281]
has not been charged. I want to hear from you.聽 Find me on Twitter at David Pakman. Let me know聽聽
[285]
your thoughts. The David Pakman Show is not only聽 buoyed by, but depends on the support of our聽聽
[314]
viewers and our listeners. You can sign up for聽 a David Pakman Show membership at join Packman聽聽
[337]
dot com and you can use the coupon code wwr 22 to聽 get a discount. If you so please, we actually do聽聽
[339]
an extra show every day for our members, and聽 I would love to see you in membership ranks.