10 Surprising Facts About the Economic Top 1% - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
When the democratic nomination for President began, many pundits and strategists saw it
[1]
as a mere formality for Hillary Clinton, while others believed it would be a sort of coronation
[2]
as the Democratic Party unified behind her.
[3]
The truth has been far from what was predicted as Senator Bernie Sanders, from Vermont, has
[4]
rallied young and old over the structural flaws with the American economy.
[5]
Specifically, Sanders has spoken out against the corporate interests that have corrupted
[6]
the political system, and have rigged the economy to their benefit.
[7]
In his speeches, Sanders has passionately argued the injustice of a system where “the
[8]
top 1/10th of 1 percent — not 1 percent — the top 1/10th of 1 percent today in America
[9]
owns almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent.”
[10]
In light of the popularity of the Sanders Campaign and his message, we decided it was
[11]
relevant to take a look at some facts about the super rich you might not be aware of.
[12]
10.
[13]
Income
[14]
While the term “1 percent” is thrown around a lot, the actual figures are not very well
[16]
known.
[17]
The small portion of the American population accounts for forty percent of the nation’s
[20]
wealth.
[21]
Each state has varying income levels that set thresholds for the top 1 percent income
[25]
levels.
[26]
The state with the worst inequality, Connecticut, also happens to have the highest level of
[29]
income for the 1 percent: $677,608.
[32]
In Connecticut, the top 1 percent earns, on average, 51 times as much as the bottom 99
[39]
percent of earners.
[40]
Other states with extremely high thresholds for inclusion in the 1 percent are: California
[44]
(438k), North Dakota (502k), and New York (506k).
[51]
And while those numbers might seem staggering for annual income, the top 0.1 percent that
[55]
Senator Sanders has been referencing makes the previous figures appear like peanuts.
[58]
The top 0.1 percent, which consists of 160,000 families, has an average wealth of $72.8 million.
[62]
In comparison, the bottom 90 percent – 144 million families – has an average wealth
[67]
of $84,000.
[69]
That means that 160,000 families have virtually the same amount of wealth as 144 million American
[77]
families.
[78]
9.
[79]
Things are Getting Worse
[80]
Another reason that has seemed to propel Senator Sanders upward in the democratic primary race
[83]
is the growing feeling that things are not getting better.
[87]
Many Americans feel that the great bullish run in the stock market has not “trickled”
[90]
down to the rest of us.
[92]
However, the truth is a little more startling.
[94]
In 81 percent of American counties, the median income which is about $52,000, is less than
[100]
it was 15 years ago.
[101]
That’s right: adjusted to inflation, middle class Americans are making less today than
[106]
they did 15 years ago.
[107]
What makes this even more upsetting is that the economy has grown 83 percent in the past
[111]
quarter-century with corporate profits doubling.
[115]
Despite the fact that American workers produce twice the amount of goods and services as
[119]
25 years ago, we get less of the pie.
[122]
To drive home the point, since 1979, national income going to the top 1% of Americans has
[127]
doubled.
[128]
8.
[129]
Above the Law
[130]
The Walmart heirs are so rich they cannot be considered a part of the 1 percent; the
[134]
six Waltons have a net worth of $144.7 billion; more wealth than the bottom 40% of Americans.
[142]
They are the super rich and their status comes with rights that seem to include being above
[147]
the law.
[148]
One of the heirs of Sam Walton, Alice Walton, has a personal net worth of 30 billion dollars.
[153]
In 2011, Alice Walton had an arrest for suspected drunken driving cleared from her record after
[158]
prosecutors declined to press formal charges.
[161]
According to a Texas official, the officer who arrested Walton was suspended and was
[165]
unable to testify in the Walton case.
[168]
A single drunk driving incident, that happened to be expunged, is not enough to claim that
[172]
a person is above the law.
[173]
However, a series of drunken driving cases surely is.
[176]
Walton had previously been convicted in 1998 of drunken driving in Springdale, Arkansas,
[182]
which resulted in a single car accident.
[184]
Again, in 1989, Alice Walton was involved in another accident where her vehicle struck
[188]
and killed a woman.
[189]
The police concluded that Walton was not responsible for the fatal accident and she was not cited
[194]
for the collision.
[195]
It is hard to imagine that the average American would manage to escape untouched like Ms.
[199]
Walton.
[200]
7.
[201]
Congress
[202]
A major point of contention in the Sanders Campaign is the Supreme Court’s ruling in
[205]
the Citizens United case.
[206]
Sanders has argued that as a result of the ruling, big money has been able to buy members
[210]
of Congress and have an even greater effect on legislation and policy.
[215]
And while the added money has certainly further corrupted our representatives, in truth, it
[218]
is unlikely that they ever truly represented the interests of middle class or lower class
[223]
citizens.
[224]
We make this claim because most members are already rich, top 1 percent rich.
[228]
As mentioned earlier, the recent Recession devastated millions of Americans with families
[232]
still struggling to recover; however, members of Congress have seen their wealth increase.
[237]
Since 2007, the onset of the recession, the median net worth of Americans has dropped
[242]
by almost one third (28%) while members of Congress’ median worth has increased by
[247]
a staggering 43%.
[250]
The median net worth of a member of Congress was $1.03 million in 2013.
[255]
The net worth of the average American?
[257]
Just $56,355.
[259]
6.
[261]
Taxes
[262]
Warren Buffett has famously said that he pays a lower tax rate than his secretary, which
[266]
has led to a lot of talk about the effectiveness of the American tax system.
[270]
The truth is that the biggest problem with the tax system is the definition of “income.”
[275]
Salon outlines it as such: “for the very wealthy, salary is trivial—if they earn
[280]
one at all.
[281]
That’s not where their riches come from.
[282]
Instead, their money comes from ‘carried interest.'”
[286]
Many of the members of the 1 percent in America are hedge fund, private equity, or investment
[290]
managers that typically receive a very small salary, with most of their compensation coming
[295]
in the form of a share of the fund or project they manage.
[299]
This represents a “carried interest” and is taxed differently than the tax rates that
[303]
apply to ordinary Americans.
[305]
The “carried interest” loophole allows hedge fund managers and others to pay 20%
[310]
on income that is far above $250,000, while ordinary Americans pay nearly double.
[316]
What makes the rule so reprehensible is that many are able to get away without paying taxes
[320]
at all.
[321]
The reason for this is that “carried interest” only counts as “income” when shares are
[325]
sold.
[326]
Individuals could continue to borrow against their assets and never pay taxes.
[331]
5.
[332]
Job Creators?
[333]
While this list may seem to generalize the 1 percent into one bag, there are many who
[336]
acknowledge that their status as wealthy does not entitle them to rights and benefits that
[341]
most Americans do not have.
[343]
One of them is Nick Hanauer, an entrepreneur and venture capitalist, who argues that the
[347]
rich are not job creators.
[349]
Hanauer has had great success as chairman of a family-owned manufacturing company in
[353]
Seattle while also making hundreds of millions of dollars through smart investments.
[358]
One of his earliest investments, Amazon, he argues did not create, but killed jobs in
[363]
the American economy.
[364]
Hanauer also makes a compelling point that while businesses hire workers they will fire
[368]
them immediately if they do not have enough demand by consumers.
[371]
He concludes that business owners do not actually create jobs but that it is the result of a
[376]
“circle-of-life-like feedback loop between customers and businesses.
[379]
And only consumers can set in motion this virtuous cycle of increasing demand and hiring.”
[384]
4.
[386]
Any Debt?
[387]
Despite the United States being the richest country in the world, a vast majority of Americans
[391]
live in debt.
[392]
According to the Pew Charitable Trusts, most of the debt comes from what many people would
[396]
call a good thing — home ownership: of the 80% of Americans with debt, 44% have mortgage
[402]
debt.
[403]
Overall, the median burden of debt among Americans is $67,900, with a median home loan balance
[409]
of $103,000.
[411]
And while this might not appear as a bad thing, what it does guarantee is that Americans will
[415]
not question the status quo or take risks to pursue occupations and ideas that they
[420]
have a genuine interest in.
[422]
The need to make mortgage payments guarantees an obedient population.
[426]
A 2015 Gallup Poll has revealed that 70% of Americans feel unhappy, uninspired, and less
[432]
engaged at their jobs.
[434]
Many Americans have a lot of non-mortgage debt, too, particularly young Americans.
[438]
Millions of young Americans are struggling with college debt, with the average graduate
[442]
accruing more than 25,000 dollars of loans.
[445]
Some suggest it could be the next bubble in our economy.
[447]
On the other hand, the top members of society are not riddled with any debt that they cannot
[451]
generally handle by selling off assets or demonstrating future growth or income.
[456]
3.
[457]
More Involved in Politics
[458]
Americans have a notion that because they live in a “democracy” that, even if the
[461]
rich are greatly involved in politics, they can’t make too great of an impact.
[466]
One vote for one American, right?
[468]
But if one American knows his representative on a first name basis, do you really believe
[472]
you’re on equal footing?
[474]
While the United States rarely gets more than 42% participation in Presidential elections,
[479]
and much less in mid-term elections, the 1 percent take politics extremely seriously.
[484]
Polls show that 99% of them vote, and two-thirds contribute money to political campaigns.
[489]
In general, the 1 percent are able to get into contact with their representatives and
[493]
their conversations are very specific, studies have shown, and reflect laws or impending
[497]
legislation that could affect wealth creation.
[500]
Many members of the 1 percent have advocated for and believe in principles opposed to the
[504]
majority of American people.
[506]
Examples include: only 43 percent agreed that “government must see that no one is without
[511]
food, clothing, or shelter,” compared to 68 percent of the general public.
[515]
Another poll shows only 40 percent support a living minimum wage, “so that no family
[519]
with a full-time worker falls below official poverty line,” compared to 78 percent of
[524]
the general public.
[525]
Lastly, only 19 percent agree that “the government in Washington ought to see to it
[529]
that everyone who wants to work can find a job,” compared to 68 percent of the general
[534]
public.
[535]
It is not hard to believe that the positions of the 1 percent are the ones that have become
[539]
the law of the land.
[541]
2.
[542]
Different Lifestyles
[543]
Most Americans spend a majority of their income on the essentials for life: housing, food,
[547]
utilities, and healthcare.
[548]
However, once one becomes wealthy priorities tend to change and the worries about other
[553]
costs fade.
[554]
And while all Americans pay an average of a third of their incomes for housing, the
[558]
great difference in spending becomes quickly apparent.
[561]
The second highest expense of top earners in America is transportation (vacation expenses).
[567]
The 1 percent spends about 17 percent of their income traveling for business and pleasure.
[572]
On the other hand, the middle and lower class spend about 17 percent of their income on
[576]
feeding their families.
[578]
A stark contrast to say the least.
[581]
1.
[582]
Wall Street
[583]
Wall Street not only represents the wealth of the 1 percent but their status as above
[587]
ordinary citizens.
[589]
After the 2008 financial crisis, when it was proven that financial impropriety, fraud,
[593]
and greed by bankers caused the crisis, it did not stop members of Congress and the President
[599]
for agreeing to a bailout that recouped their losses.
[602]
While millions of Americans lost their homes and their jobs, members of the 1 percent,
[606]
including hedge fund and investment managers, were paying themselves bonuses for a job well
[611]
done.
[612]
For example, Citigroup, which received a bailout amounting to essentially being one-third owned
[615]
by the government, gave 738 of its employee’s bonuses of at least $1 million, even after
[622]
it lost $18.7 billion during the year.
[626]
In addition, Bank of America, which also received $45 billion in bailout money money, paid $3.3
[632]
billion in bonuses, with 172 employees receiving at least $1 million.
[638]
As the country has recovered, at least on the surface, during Obama’s presidency,
[642]
even he has come to admit that 95% of income gains have gone to those at the top.
[648]
That means that while the stocks have roared back, the millions of Americans who lost everything
[652]
during the crisis are still struggling to get back on
[661]
their two feet.