The Breakdown: What Went Wrong with COVID Relief - YouTube

Channel: POGO

[0]
"CONSIDERS A TRILLION-DOLLAR STIMULUS TO RESCUE THE ECONOMY."
[3]
"$3 TRILLION STIMULUS PACKAGE. THIS WOULD BE THE LARGEST IN HISTORY."
[9]
"PRESIDENT TRUMP SIGNED INTO LAW THE LARGEST ECONOMIC AID PACKAGE IN HISTORY..."
[14]
We know that the government is spending an unprecedented amount of money on relief during the pandemic.
[20]
But do we know where this money is going?
[22]
Who is receiving it?
[24]
And what is it being used for?
[26]
Let's break it down
[28]
[35]
In 2020, Congress passed five major bills on  COVID-19 emergency spending and relief.
[42]
Altogether, Congress has authorized at least $3.5 trillion in relief spending so far.
[49]
SEAN: And that really is, I have to say, unprecedented.
[53]
And I'm not trying to make it sound like it's unwarranted,
[55]
this is a very massive crisis unlike anything we've ever seen before,
[59]
but that level of spending just dwarfs anything we've done before.
[64]
That's Sean Moulton.
[66]
He's a senior policy analyst at POGO who helped build a prototype for the main federal spending tracker in the United States, usaspending.gov.
[76]
He's also been tracking the government's coronavirus relief spending since March.
[81]
SEAN: And what we have found is that when you spend a lot of money very quickly, you can make mistakes and wind up wasting some of it.
[89]
But the other thing that we have seen is that
[91]
opportunistic people out there will come out of the woodwork knowing that you're spending so much money quickly,
[99]
and that maybe you're not looking at everything,
[102]
and they will try and defraud the government and take some  of that money to put in their own pockets  
[108]
and not to help with the process.
[110]
As a result, plenty of businesses received funds with little to no accountability.
[116]
"LOTS OF CELEBRITIES. LOTS OF INVESTMENT BANKS - "
[119]
RUTH'S CHRIS STEAKHOUSE. SHAKE SHACK - "
[121]
"THE CLOTHING BRAND OF KANYE WEST -"
[123]
"THESE GREEDY COMPANIES COME IN, AND THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED."
[126]
And that of course isn't what Congress intended.
[129]
But the administration came up short in following the CARES Act, the single largest relief bill authorized by Congress.  
[137]
The legislation laid out very specific reporting  requirements for the Paycheck Protection Program,
[143]
which was intended to keep small businesses afloat.
[146]
Congress mandated that companies that received more than $150,000 in assistance
[152]
must report back to the government on what they did with that money
[156]
SEAN: And unfortunately the administration looked  at that legal requirement and, "said we don't need to do this."
[164]
And they never set up a system to collect that information.
[166]
And to this day, it remains probably our biggest blind spot when it comes to the accountability around the COVID spending.  
[174]
On top of not knowing if this assistance  was effective, it also didn't go to those who needed it most.  
[181]
When Congress authorized billions of dollars in relief spending,
[185]
they recognized that some businesses would need more help than others. And that concern seems warranted.
[191]
This study later showed that Black business owners had a harder time getting federal aid from banks than white customers did.
[198]
So, to assist those who were already falling through the cracks of the financial system  
[203]
Congress specifically wanted the Paycheck Protection Program to address the needs of  
[208]
women, minority, and veteran-owned businesses.
[211]
However, multiple reports suggest that the administration didn't follow through.
[217]
This House report writes word-for-word that contrary to Congress's clear intent,
[222]
the Trump administration and many big banks  failed to prioritize small businesses in underserved markets.
[229]
Another report shows that large companies  received loans significantly faster than small businesses,
[236]
and to top it all off,
[237]
businesses that were already thriving during the pandemic got in on the action too.
[243]
SEAN: The money just seemed to be spent based on who got in line first,
[247]
and who got lined first were the people who had  the best relationships with banks and other financial institutions.
[252]
One of the things I really worry about isn't even that some of these smaller companies were at the back of the line,
[258]
I'm worried  they didn't line up at all.
[260]
It may be that because they didn't get the assistance, they're out of business.
[264]
That could be a real cost to not having done this better in the first round,
[268]
because there are real barriers that some of these really small businesses face.
[273]
Most of the aid from 2020 has already been spent, but more is likely on the way.
[278]
While it may seem easiest to move on  from past mistakes, we need to learn from them.
[284]
Because this pandemic and its effects on our  economy are far from over.
[289]
SEAN: We need to figure out what went wrong with 2020 money.
[293]
If we don't look back carefully at what we've done,
[297]
we run the risk of repeating those same mistakes.
[300]
And I know that there's an urgency, there are companies that are hurting,
[304]
but I can't stress enough that
[306]
when you spend money in the wrong places, it's as bad as not getting the money out to people.
[311]
It's the exact same thing.
[313]