Why It's Better to be Single | 4 Reasons - YouTube

Channel: EinzelgÀnger

[0]
The romantic ideal of two people pair-bonding and staying together for a long time is still
[5]
very much alive.
[7]
However, in the current age, we can see that an increasing amount of people deliberately
[12]
chooses to stay single.
[15]
Especially in the West, marriage is in decline, and singlehood is rising.
[20]
According to data from the General Social Survey released in 2019, more than half of
[26]
Americans between the ages of 18 and 34 said they don’t have a steady romantic partner.
[33]
In Germany, more than 40% percent of the households were single people.
[37]
But even though Western countries lead the way when it comes to one-person households,
[42]
we can see a worldwide increase in people living alone.
[46]
Despite the global trend of bachelors and bachelorettes, single people still face a
[51]
social stigma and discrimination.
[54]
A 2020 research paper entitled “Are Single People a Stigmatized Group?”
[61]
notes that single people face discrimination, prejudice, and financial challenges (as they
[67]
often earn less and pay more taxes, and also pay more for social benefits and health care).
[73]
But it’s not all doom and gloom.
[75]
The same study shows that many people enjoy singlehood.
[79]
An article written by social psychologist Bella DePaulo states that married people aren’t
[85]
necessarily better off.
[86]
“Claims that getting married makes people happier, healthier, and more integrated into
[91]
society are grossly exaggerated or just plain wrong,” she states.
[97]
Moreover, being single has plenty of benefits over being married in terms of meaning, pursuing
[103]
interests and passions, and personal growth.
[106]
So, is it better to be single?
[109]
It depends.
[110]
Different people look for different things.
[113]
For many, engaging in relationships and marriage works out very well.
[117]
But some people don’t like the idea of partnering up and settling down.
[122]
They flourish being single.
[124]
So, this video does not seek to persuade people to stay out of relationships and marriages
[130]
or criticize those in them.
[132]
It’s not even a defense of singlehood.
[135]
The goal of this short essay is to present several arguments why being single could be
[141]
a better option.
[149]
1) Relationships and marriage won’t necessarily make us happier
[155]
Marriage has been the cornerstone of society for most of known history.
[159]
We still consider marriage and relationships the ‘proper modes’ of living.
[163]
When we’re young, society expects us to find someone to marry, start a family, and
[168]
(ideally) live happily ever after.
[171]
But what if you’re single?
[173]
If we ascribe to the idea that a fully-fledged life includes being in a long-term relationship
[179]
or marriage, then people who don’t meet that criterion have essentially failed.
[184]
So, it’s no surprise that people often frown upon singles.
[188]
They might see them as undesirable, failures, and escaping responsibility.
[194]
Then, there’s this common belief that people in relationships and marriage are happier.
[200]
Single people don’t experience the priceless joys of walking down the aisle, the honeymoon,
[205]
having children, and living together under one roof for decades.
[210]
If these are the ingredients of a happy life, then being single is not only a failure and
[215]
denial of responsibility; it’s also a tragedy.
[220]
Undoubtedly, some people experience their bachelorhood as undesirable, especially those
[225]
who don’t choose to be single and long for companionship and, as a consequence, feel
[230]
that they lack something essential.
[232]
But do they genuinely lack something?
[235]
Or is it simply their belief that being single is (somehow) wrong, which evokes their unhappiness?
[243]
According to recent studies, the latter is probably the case.
[246]
An article (link below) by author and sociologist Elyakim Kislev states that numerous studies
[253]
in the 20th and early 21st century have glorified marriage and stigmatized what it means to
[259]
be single.
[260]
“However,” he wrote, “newer studies are proving that married people are not happier
[265]
and healthier as was previously believed.”
[268]
Kislev summarizes a selection of studies that indicate the following:
[273]
People who get married tend to be a bit happier in the year of the wedding, but eventually,
[278]
their happiness returns to where it was prior.
[282]
There’s always a decline in happiness in married couples at all marital durations.
[287]
And, there’s no evidence that children affect life satisfaction.
[292]
So, according to several recent studies, marriage does not affect long-term happiness.
[298]
Moreover, Bella DePaulo states that many people are, what she calls, ‘single-at-heart.’
[304]
For them, singlehood is the most meaningful, authentic, and fulfilling way of life.
[313]
2) Cultivating healthier forms of love
[317]
Many cultures elevate romantic love to an ‘ultimate concern,’ meaning that it’s
[322]
one of the most significant elements of life that a human being can pursue.
[327]
But there are different ways to love besides romance, like the love between friends and
[332]
family members.
[334]
The idea of friendship may not be as enticing as a fiery romance with lots of lust and passion.
[340]
But some sages of old argue that romance isn’t the healthiest form of love, looking at the
[346]
amount of suffering that comes with it.
[349]
Take Epicurus, for example, an ancient Greek philosopher who preached the wisdom of managing
[354]
our pleasures to live tranquil and happy lives.
[357]
Epicurus was a great proponent of friendship and enjoying the simple pleasures of life
[362]
like bread, cheese, and weak wine in the companionship of friends.
[367]
But romance, and more specifically, sexual intercourse, he considered a natural but unnecessary
[374]
desire that could potentially be harmful.
[376]
“Sexual intercourse never helped anyone, and one must be satisfied if it has not harmed,”
[383]
Epicurus stated.
[384]
But, he thought it’s not so much the sexual intercourse itself but ‘sexual passion’
[391]
that disturbs a peaceful mind.
[393]
Following such passions could lead to adultery, abuse, addiction, illnesses, unwanted pregnancy,
[401]
violence, and even murder.
[404]
Epicurus also warns that sexual desire could lead to self-destruction by wasting our time
[410]
and resources on the person we lust after.
[413]
Or put differently: exchanging our very lives for a piece of human meat.
[419]
Today’s romantic relationships are often breeding grounds for passion.
[424]
In many cases, love affairs are fueled by lust and excitement (which seems to be the
[429]
norm) and lack rational thinking and wisdom.
[433]
After seeing an explosion of pleasure and passion, we eventually see a blast of pain
[438]
and despair.
[440]
Extreme jealousy, the agony of heartbreak, the fear of loss, the weeping over the absence
[446]
of one’s lover are all part of the painful fate of being wounded by the darts of Venus.
[452]
So, wouldn’t it be wiser to focus on forms of love that are ‘cooler’ in nature?
[459]
Friendship, for instance, is generally less passionate and exciting but could be at least
[465]
as fulfilling.
[467]
Long-term friendships are usually slowly developed bonds based on common ground, unencumbered
[473]
by unhealthy attachments.
[474]
It’s not as hot and blazing as romance but cool and enjoyable like a pleasant morning
[481]
breeze.
[482]
Singles don’t have to direct their love mainly to one significant other but can diversify
[487]
and spread it out to a much greater number of people.
[491]
They simply have more time to spend on friends, family, and neighbors and are more attentive
[496]
to them compared to married people, according to DePaulo.
[500]
And whether or not these married couples have children plays no factor in this.
[506]
3) Freedom
[508]
There’s a sense of freedom that comes with being single, which married people aren’t
[513]
likely to experience.
[514]
It’s the freedom to do what you want without taking a partner or spouse into account: without
[520]
justification, discussion, or compromise.
[523]
A significant element of singlehood is the freedom in the pursuit of meaning.
[529]
French-Algerian philosopher Albert Camus believed that the universe has no meaning, so it’s
[534]
futile to seek the meaning of life.
[537]
Instead, we should create meaning ourselves.
[540]
Still, religious and societal structures try to impose meaning onto us, including the idea
[546]
that relationships, marriage, and having children are the main ingredients for a meaningful
[552]
life.
[553]
According to Camus, it’s absurd to think with certainty that some things about life
[557]
are inherently meaningful, and others are not.
[560]
Therefore, being married or in a relationship isn’t intrinsically more meaningful than
[565]
being single.
[567]
It solely depends on the level of meaning we attribute to whatever we do.
[572]
So, being single could mean turning your back to conventions and fully immersing yourself
[577]
in a purpose without spending a second on relationship matters.
[582]
An example of this is Nikola Tesla, a lifelong bachelor who gave himself entirely to science
[588]
and engineering.
[589]
He once explained that his abstinence from women was helpful to his scientific abilities.
[595]
So, even though Tesla may be an extreme example, we could say that being single increases the
[601]
freedom of doing whatever gives our lives meaning.
[604]
“Singles value opportunities to pursue their interests and passions and do the work they
[610]
care about the most.
[611]
They care more about meaningful work than married people do.
[615]
Lifelong single people develop a greater sense of autonomy over time than people who stay married.”
[621]
says DePaulo.
[623]
4) Self-sufficiency
[626]
Single people are more likely to reap the benefits of solitude.
[630]
Moreover, their aloneness offers them the opportunity to become more self-sufficient,
[635]
in other words, more capable of fulfilling their own needs.
[639]
In a society where pair-bonding is the norm, we tend to see ourselves as incomplete without
[644]
a partner, as we’re just the half of a heart that needs another half to be whole.
[649]
But many happy singles would argue against this way of thinking, as completeness is to
[654]
be found within.
[656]
A partner is no cure for emptiness, nor is it a requirement for happiness.
[660]
If it were, then everyone in a relationship would be fulfilled, which is not the case.
[667]
Also, all single people would be perpetually unhappy, which isn’t the case either.
[672]
The unwillingness to accept that romance won’t provide us long-lasting happiness leads some
[678]
people to jump from relationship to relationship, like heroin addicts living from shot to shot.
[685]
They never quite find what they seek.
[687]
But as a single person, one could seize the opportunity to embrace a complete responsibility
[693]
for one’s happiness, largely independent of outside circumstances.
[697]
In this case, the focus lies on cultivating the ‘skills’ (for the lack of a better
[703]
term) to satisfy ourselves.
[706]
Becoming self-sufficient, not just financially but also emotionally, has several benefits.
[712]
Firstly, it’s reliable, as our contentment lies for the most significant part within
[717]
our control.
[718]
Secondly, it’s cheap because the less we need to be satisfied, the more affordable
[724]
our happiness becomes.
[726]
Thirdly, we prepare ourselves for the unavoidable, which is that we end up alone anyway, as ‘aloneness’
[733]
(like death) is an inevitable part of life that many people fear.
[738]
But if we can thrive in solitude, we won’t fear being alone and most likely even enjoy it.
[744]
As Jean-Paul Sartre stated: “If you are lonely when you’re alone, you are in bad company.”
[753]
Thank you for watching.