Monopolistic Competition Part 3 Excess Capacity and Efficiency - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
- Okay now, let me go ahead
[2]
and talk about what's sometimes called the issue
[7]
of excess capacity
[11]
and efficiency in monopolistic competition.
[16]
So I'm going to revert back to a more normal
[20]
looking set of cost curves for this part.
[25]
And so we're going to go ahead
[27]
and have a U shaped average and total cost curve,
[33]
and we're going to have a marginal cost curve
[36]
that looks like this.
[37]
And remember,
[39]
the marginal cost curve crosses the average total cost curve
[44]
at the minimum of the average total cost curve.
[48]
And it doesn't quite look like that in my version,
[53]
so I'll draw it just a little bit differently here.
[56]
And we know that in the long run equilibrium,
[60]
we're going to have the demand curve
[68]
just touching the average total cost curve,
[73]
so that this firm is charging a price equal average total cost,
[81]
so it's just breaking even.
[87]
And the marginal revenue curve would be down here.
[91]
And this firm is producing that amount.
[95]
And pretend that these all line up here
[96]
and I didn't have to curve that line.
[99]
So what we can see here is,
[102]
here's the actual quantity this firm's producing,
[106]
and here, below the minimum
[110]
of the average total cost curve is the quantity
[114]
that would cause this firm to minimize the cost or production.
[118]
Or put differently,
[119]
this is the most efficient scale for this firm to operate,
[124]
and so this firm has excess capacity.
[127]
It has the capacity to serve this amount,
[129]
this quantity efficiently,
[131]
but in fact, it's only producing this amount.
[135]
And from a certain point of view,
[137]
there's deadweight loss in this example,
[140]
because there are units, say right here,
[144]
where someone was willing to pay that much for it.
[146]
It only had a marginal cost of that much,
[149]
and so that gain from trade didn't happen.
[154]
So some people talk about the dead weight loss
[160]
due to this excess capacity,
[163]
is that shaded region right there,
[166]
above the marginal cost curve,
[168]
and below the demand curve.
[169]
Just like the dead weight loss from monopoly.
[173]
So the question often comes up then,
[177]
is monopolistic competition inefficient?
[181]
And this sort of, I think,
[183]
gets into a contrast between a totally ideal world
[187]
and a more realistic world.
[191]
I think you to realize of course,
[193]
that we're not having anyone make any economic profits.
[199]
Effectively, the entry of new firms serves
[204]
as a kind of automatic regulation
[206]
of these firms monopoly power.
[208]
Because remember the best we can do, probably,
[211]
with a true monopolist,
[214]
is to try and get them to charge price equals average total cost,
[219]
so that they're not, you know,
[221]
charging a huge markup and so on and so forth, out there.
[224]
You know, theoretically,
[225]
perhaps we could make ourselves better off by having
[229]
some of these monopolistically competitive firms merge
[233]
and then putting them under price regulation.
[235]
That would allow us to get rid of the excess capacity problem,
[241]
but not have these firms charging a huge markup.
[244]
But if you sort of think about what that would look like,
[247]
suppose you think about a medium size town,
[250]
and there's maybe like 20 restaurants.
[253]
And of course those restaurants add value through their variety.
[257]
If we force them to merge down to ten restaurants instead,
[262]
you know, we would have a much smaller amount of variety,
[266]
and that variety,
[267]
we can't show it easily in this kind of diagram,
[270]
but it definitely has significant value.
[273]
So I, myself, don't tend to worry about this issue
[276]
of excess capacity
[278]
and any potential dead weight loss there.
[281]
One thing that's worth noticing is,
[283]
a perfectly competitive firm,
[286]
is not willing to pay anything
[288]
to sell more at its current price.
[291]
Because a perfectly competitive firm can already sell
[295]
as much as it wants at the current market price.
[299]
So a perfectly competitive firm
[300]
typically does not engage in advertisement.
[304]
Monopoly firms also don't engage in advertisement.
[307]
They would like to be able
[308]
to sell more at their current price,
[310]
and not have to cut price to sell more,
[312]
but it's very difficult to actually increase sales
[315]
if you already have 100% of the market.
[318]
But for a monopolistically competitive firm,
[322]
there definitely is a significant benefit
[324]
to making more sales at your current price,
[328]
because essentially your incremental profit
[330]
per unit is equal to this gap
[333]
between the price you charge and your current marginal cost.
[337]
So, monopolistically competitive firms
[341]
actually do engage in a lot of advertising and other marketing,
[346]
and this is in contrast again,
[347]
to something like a perfectly competitive firm,
[349]
or a monopoly firm.