Michael Burry: EVERYONE Will Be Terrified Soon - YouTube

Channel: Casgains Academy

[0]
Michael Burry just dropped a bombshell on聽 one of the most shocking crises of all time.聽聽
[5]
Just like 1999 and 2008, nobody knows what Burry聽 sees, but the world is about to wake up soon. In聽聽
[11]
Burry's own words, "The theater took more than聽 a decade to overstuff. "Not likely everyone gets聽聽
[17]
out in less than a year." While it took ages for聽 the theater to be stuffed with millions of people,聽聽
[22]
the collapse will be quick and painful. Some聽 people are inevitably going to be left behind聽聽
[27]
and it's going to be their fault for not聽 catching on. Even though the signs have聽聽
[31]
been there for years, investors worldwide聽 will still be in for a rude awakening.聽聽
[38]
Everyone knows that the government messed up,聽 but that's not what I'm about to tell you.聽聽
[42]
The Federal Reserve printed $5 trillion聽 and this unsurprisingly led prices to rise.聽聽
[47]
The inflation rate is currently at 8.6% as a聽 result of this. Contrary to the mainstream media,聽聽
[53]
Burry doesn't think that inflation is聽 going to remain elevated in the short-term.聽聽
[57]
It's true that the fed printed at an annual聽 rate of $1.5 trillion during the pandemic,聽聽
[61]
but the opposite is now playing out. The Fed聽 is planning to cut the money supply at an聽聽
[66]
annual rate of $1.1 trillion. If prices rose聽 after the Fed printed trillions of dollars,聽聽
[71]
it's logical to assume that prices will聽 drop after the Fed pulls back trillions.聽聽
[76]
This is happening at the same time that supply聽 chains are catching up to demand. Supply chains聽聽
[80]
have been under pressure over the past couple of聽 years, but this is starting to change. The world聽聽
[85]
hasn't been sitting back and letting the pandemic聽 gloom over. It's in our nature to adapt to the聽聽
[90]
changing environment. New supply chains have聽 been set up. Businesses have been becoming more聽聽
[95]
efficient. More container ships are being built.聽 The supply panic is on full speed by all means.聽聽
[101]
One shipping analyst said that last week, 13 more聽 container ships were ordered, bringing the total聽聽
[106]
for the year to 239. This is already the fifth聽 largest year on record for container ship orders聽聽
[112]
and we are only halfway through the year. Such聽 a large increase is obviously not sustainable.聽聽
[117]
Another analyst explained how the size of the聽 outlook is obviously a reason for concern.聽聽
[122]
We're starting to see the scramble to produce聽 supply in the growth of inventories. Wholesale聽聽
[126]
inventories are up 24% year-over-year. The problem聽 with this newfound supply is that consumers are聽聽
[132]
not spending as much. Consumer sentiment is at聽 a one and a half decade low according to the聽聽
[136]
UMichigan Consumer Sentiment Index. When you have聽 an oversupply of goods and low consumer demand,聽聽
[142]
prices are bound to drop at a rapid pace. Burry聽 tweeted, "Question: in 2022, "what brings a聽聽
[148]
Christmas in July? "Answer: a disinflationary聽 overstocked consumer recession "at Christmas."聽聽
[154]
Burry is hinting at an upcoming supply聽 glut. A supply glut is when retail stores,聽聽
[159]
suddenly have far too much supply and not聽 enough demand. As a result of a supply glut,聽聽
[164]
retail stores will have to start dropping聽 prices by introducing mass sales.聽聽
[168]
That's what Burry means when he says聽 that Christmas will come early in July.聽聽
[172]
Christmas sales always happen because businesses聽 produce too many goods that need to be sold.聽聽
[177]
The only way to sell those goods is by dropping聽 the price. July 2022 will be an early Christmas聽聽
[183]
and not for a good reason. When there are too聽 many goods on the shelves, corporate profits聽聽
[187]
will drop immensely, which will eventually cause聽 people to be laid off or see their salaries cut.聽聽
[192]
Burry expanded on this concept by saying, "This聽 supply glut at retail is the Bullwhip Effect.聽聽
[197]
"Google it. "Worth understanding for your聽 investing endeavors. "Deflationary pulses聽聽
[202]
from this leads to disinflation "and CPI later聽 this year, "which then leads to the Fed reversing聽聽
[207]
itself on rates "and quantitative tightening "And聽 this leads to cycles of that occurring again.聽聽
[212]
The Bullwhip Effect is when a spike in demand聽 causes the suppliers to order too much supply.聽聽
[217]
This is because businesses tend to order a聽 little more supply than needed as a safety net.聽聽
[221]
The problem with this is that when there's a聽 chain of businesses all ordering extra orders,聽聽
[226]
the supply can be magnified to unhealthy levels.聽 The supply chain typically includes retailers,聽聽
[231]
wholesalers and manufacturers. As you can see in聽 this demonstration, each step of the supply chain聽聽
[237]
over ordering ultimately leads to excess orders.聽 This is similar to a bullwhip, hence the name聽聽
[242]
the Bullwhip Effect. Let's say a Walmart store聽 typically sells around 30 boxes of cereal per day.聽聽
[248]
Because of a new social media trend, cereal sales聽 have increased drastically in the short-term.聽聽
[253]
Instead of selling the typical 30 boxes of聽 cereal, let's say the Walmart store is now selling聽聽
[258]
90 boxes of cereal per day. As a result of this聽 increase in demand, Walmart will now order cereal聽聽
[263]
at a rate of 150 boxes of cereal per day. This聽 gives Walmart 60 extra boxes per day, just in case聽聽
[270]
the demand increases at any point in time. General聽 Mills now receives Walmart's order of 150 cereal聽聽
[276]
boxes per day. This spike in demand will now be聽 General Mills to order 250 cereal boxes per day.聽聽
[282]
The cereal manufacturer will now see 250聽 orders and increased production to 350 cereal聽聽
[287]
boxes per day. Throughout this process,聽 we went from 90 boxes of cereal to 350.聽聽
[293]
Not only do we have 260 extra boxes of cereal per聽 day, but the short term spike in demand could also聽聽
[299]
dissipate at any point in time. Because there聽 was a sudden increase in the supply of cereal,聽聽
[304]
businesses across the supply chain will have to聽 cut prices. This causes the opposite of a supply聽聽
[309]
glut. Retailers will now order less supply.聽 Once the cereal supply inevitably runs out,聽聽
[315]
businesses will once again be left聽 scrambling to get their hands on cereal.聽聽
[319]
Cereal prices will skyrocket once again, causing聽 retailers like Walmart to order more cereal. This聽聽
[325]
brings us back to square one. We are currently聽 experiencing the Bullwhip Effect on steroids.聽聽
[330]
Retailers have ordered boatloads full of supply聽 as a result of the unprecedented supply shortage.聽聽
[335]
This has led to one of the biggest bullwhips in聽 history. And when there's a bullwhip, a supply聽聽
[340]
glut is inevitable. Burry knows our incoming聽 supply glut will cause deflationary forces that聽聽
[345]
lead to disinflation. Disinflation is when the聽 inflation rate slows down dramatically. So instead聽聽
[350]
of inflation continuing to accelerate like many聽 think, inflation will actually decelerate soon.聽聽
[355]
Because of incoming disinflation from the Bullwhip聽 Effect, the Fed may start printing money again,聽聽
[361]
which is better known as quantitative easing.聽 Quantitative easing will then boost consumer聽聽
[365]
demand and cause another supply shortage. Because聽 of the supply shortage, the Fed will then pull聽聽
[370]
money out of the system to stop inflation - also聽 known as quantitative tightening. The only problem聽聽
[375]
is that retailers will once again order extra聽 supply and cause the Bullwhip Effect again.聽聽
[380]
When there's too much supply, prices will drop and聽 cause the Fed to start quantitative easing again.聽聽
[385]
This would artificially increase consumer聽 demand and lead to a supply shortage,聽聽
[389]
which only sets the stage for another bullwhip.聽 Such a cycle is frightening because it causes the聽聽
[394]
economy to be stuck in recurring bullwhips. We are聽 currently in the bullwhip portion of this cycle,聽聽
[398]
and as a result, will experience one of the聽 worst crashes in history. The Bullwhip Effect聽聽
[403]
is simply caused by human nature and cannot聽 be stopped regardless of how well known it is.聽聽
[408]
Burry elaborated on the Bullwhip Effect by聽 saying, "Across the economy, "different verticals聽聽
[413]
are in different phases "at the same time. "But聽 fundamental equity investors "are rarely looking聽聽
[418]
at more than one vertical at a time." Burry聽 is essentially calling for a massive bullwhip聽聽
[422]
across the entire economy. This means that the聽 bullwhip doesn't just include retail stores聽聽
[426]
like Walmart and Target. It could also include聽 other industries ranging all the way from plane聽聽
[431]
manufacturing to cell phones. Attached to Burry's聽 tweet was a website describing the Beer Game.聽聽
[436]
Contrary to what you might be thinking, the Beer聽 Game has nothing to do with drinking beer. The聽聽
[441]
goal of the Beer Game is to simulate the supply聽 chain of beer. There are four units in the game.聽聽
[445]
The retailer, wholesaler, distributor and brewer.聽 Students in the game are split up into four groups聽聽
[451]
with each group being a unit. The goal of each聽 unit is to obtain the highest profit possible.聽聽
[457]
At the end of the game, it is almost always the聽 case that inventories end up being too high.聽聽
[462]
This is because each of the four units聽 always order extra beers, which magnifies聽聽
[466]
the end results. The Beer Game proves that聽 the Bullwhip Effect is simply human nature.聽聽
[471]
Retailers are already seeing the Bullwhip Effect聽 at play right now. Walmart's inventories in the聽聽
[475]
first quarter of 2022 were up 33% year-over-year.聽 Home Depot's inventories were up 32%.聽聽
[482]
This happened while Walmart, Home Depot and Target聽 all saw their sales increase by only two to four聽聽
[486]
percent year-over-year. The retailers' inventories聽 are increasing 10 times faster than sales,聽聽
[492]
which is an obvious sign of the Bullwhip Effect.聽 As mentioned before, the Bullwhip Effect doesn't聽聽
[497]
just happen once every decade. It's a recurring聽 cycle that only worsens over time, with prices聽聽
[502]
mainly going upwards over the long-term. Burry聽 tweeted, "January, 1973. "President Johnson died,聽聽
[509]
Foreman beat Frazier, "and Roe v. Wade. "The Dow聽 Jones hit its highs for the 1966 to 1982 period,聽聽
[516]
"as cyclical inflation reduced the spending of聽 the dollar "to just 35 cents." "There was never聽聽
[520]
a deflation to reverse that. "Now 10 cents." The聽 cycle of bullwhips caused prices to go up and down聽聽
[526]
periodically. But at the end of the cycle, there聽 was one last price surge that never saw its聽
[530]
downward counterpart. So while prices oscillated,聽 they ended up being elevated in the long-term.聽聽
[536]
Attached to Burry's tweet was a graph聽 showing the inflation rate in the 1970s.聽聽
[540]
You can clearly see how the inflation rate聽 was moving up and down in a cyclical fashion,聽聽
[544]
which perfectly demonstrates the Bullwhip Effect聽 at play. Over time the Bullwhip Effect got bigger聽聽
[550]
and bigger with the inflation rate always聽 being positive. Prices throughout the 1970s聽聽
[554]
rose dramatically. And they never went back down聽 because inflation remained significantly positive.聽聽
[559]
The last surge in the inflation rate never聽 went back down to the 2% rate that happened聽聽
[563]
in the first bullwhip. Burry explained further by聽 saying, "Transitory, no. "Peak, no. "To the moon?聽聽
[569]
"If you mean a cold dark place." At the bottom聽 of his tweet was an article describing how prices聽聽
[574]
went up so much that nobody wanted to purchase聽 bonds anymore. "The CPI news this morning was聽聽
[579]
so awful "that it changed the bond market's view聽 of Fed trajectory "and the weakest sector broke.聽聽
[584]
"In bond jargon, "mortgage-backed securities聽 went no-bid. "No buyers for mortgage-backed聽聽
[589]
securities." The financial markets typically聽 work with bids and asks. The bid is the price聽聽
[594]
that buyers are willing to pay and the ask is聽 the price that sellers are willing to sell. This聽聽
[599]
creates a spread between the two prices. A market聽 maker like Citadel will then purchase the asset聽聽
[604]
at the bidding price and sell it at the asking聽 price, essentially making money from the spread.聽聽
[609]
Inflation was so high in June that there were no聽 bids for mortgage-backed securities. This means聽聽
[614]
that there was literally no price that buyers were聽 willing to pay for on mortgage-backed securities,聽聽
[618]
which are bonds that are secured by home loans.聽 This is a terrifying signal showing that inflation聽聽
[623]
is likely here to stay. This is because even聽 though the Fed is trying to stop inflation,聽聽
[628]
not everyone is on the same page. Burry tweeted聽 an article announcing the inflation relief聽聽
[632]
payments that Californians will receive. This is聽 ridiculous because giving free money is only going聽聽
[637]
to make inflation worse. He ridiculed California's聽 behavior by saying, "That is not how this works.聽聽
[643]
"That is not how any of this works." We're聽 clearly in a frightening economic environment,聽聽
[648]
but there must be light at the end of the tunnel.聽 Burry doesn't see this light coming anytime soon.聽聽
[653]
He tweeted a quote by billionaire businessman Tom聽 Siebel: "I don't think this is going to be over聽聽
[658]
"until everybody swears they will never own crypto聽 "and they will never own a technology stock."聽聽
[662]
Burry added his own comment by saying, "Such was聽 a sign in 2002, 1932, and '74. "09 was a panic聽聽
[670]
bottom, "but 07 not a speculative peak in stocks."聽 We experienced a speculative peak in 2021. And聽聽
[677]
speculation typically ends with everyone scared聽 of speculative assets. We're currently not there聽聽
[682]
yet at the moment. Bitcoin, an asset that Burry聽 despises, is still relatively popular right now.聽聽
[688]
Burry tweeted a graph showing the correlation聽 between NASDAQ and Bitcoin and questioned,聽聽
[692]
"Are we sure Bitcoin is not just another risk聽 asset "in the NASDAQ 100?" The strong correlation聽聽
[698]
between Bitcoin and the NASDAQ shows that Bitcoin聽 isn't an uncorrelated asset. The facts that聽聽
[702]
Bitcoin's price fluctuates in a similar fashion聽 to the NASDAQ shows that it is simply just another聽聽
[707]
tech stock with a new name. Some people like Jim聽 Cramer might point toward a short-term rally as a聽聽
[712]
sign of recovery. But Burry knows that short-term聽 rallies happen the most during market crashes.聽聽
[717]
It might sound contradicting to have the聽 biggest rallies during market crashes,聽聽
[721]
but history has shown that to be the case. Burry聽 tweeted, "Who knew this year was so much fun,聽聽
[726]
"because of all the doomed rallies?聽 "Recall, 1929 to 1932 top to bottom,聽聽
[731]
"10 rallies above 10%, averaging 23%. "2000 to聽 2002, 16 rallies above 10%, averaging 23%." So聽聽
[740]
every year we have a massive multi-year crash,聽 there are plenty 10 to 25% rallies. However,聽聽
[746]
you shouldn't mistake those rallies as a sign of聽 long-term market recovery. Short-term rallies mean聽聽
[751]
nothing during a bear market. So with that being聽 said, how is Burry preparing for the incoming聽聽
[756]
crisis? People can say whatever they want, but if聽 their money isn't where the mouth is, then they're聽聽
[761]
simply bluffing for attention. Unlike other market聽 crash predictors, Burry's money is certainly where聽聽
[766]
his mouth is. That being said, his positions聽 are more complicated than you might think.聽聽
[771]
That's why I'm going to release another video聽 analyzing how he's about to make hundreds of聽聽
[774]
millions of dollars in the coming crash. You're聽 going to be surprised at what I have uncovered in聽聽
[778]
Burry's unique and convoluted strategy. Make聽 sure to hit that subscribe button, so that聽聽
[783]
you don't miss out on my next video analyzing聽 Burry's portfolio. If you enjoyed this video,聽聽
[787]
please hit the Like button as well. Thank you for聽 all your support and I'll see you in the next one.