Inderpal Bhandari, IBM | IBM CDO Fall Summit 2018 - YouTube

Channel: SiliconANGLE theCUBE

[0]
live from Boston it's the cube covering
[5]
IBM chief data officer summit brought to
[9]
you by IBM
[15]
welcome back to the cubes live coverage
[17]
of the IBM CDO summit here in Boston
[20]
Massachusetts
[20]
I'm your host Rebecca night along with
[22]
my co-host Paul Gilliam we're joined by
[24]
Interpol Bhandari he is the global chief
[27]
data officer at IBM thank you so much
[29]
for coming back on the Q Vander Paul
[31]
it's my pleasure great to have you thank
[33]
you for having so I want to talk I'm
[34]
gonna start by talking a little bit
[35]
about your own career journey you start
[38]
your first studio job was in the chief
[41]
in the early 2000s
[43]
you were one of the first Studios ever
[45]
in the history of chief data officers
[48]
talk a little bit about the evolution of
[51]
the role and sort of set the scene for
[53]
our viewers in white terms of what
[55]
you've seen in your own career Yes No
[57]
thank you at December 2006 I became a
[61]
chief data officer for major healthcare
[63]
company and you know it turned out at
[67]
that time there were only four of us -
[69]
in banking one in the internet I was the
[71]
only one in healthcare and now of course
[73]
they're well over a thousand of us and
[75]
the professions taken off and I've had
[78]
the fortune of actually doing this four
[80]
times now so leaving a legacy in four
[83]
different organizations in terms of
[84]
building that organizational capability
[86]
I think initially when you know when I
[90]
became chief data officer the culture
[95]
was one of viewing data as exhaust
[99]
something that you had to discard that
[101]
came out of the transactions that he
[104]
were you know your business was doing
[107]
and then after that he would discard
[108]
this data he didn't really care about it
[111]
and over the course of time people have
[115]
begun to realize that data is actually a
[117]
strategic asset
[119]
really use it to drive not just the data
[122]
strategy but the actual business
[123]
strategy and maybe enable the business
[126]
to go to the next level and that
[127]
transitions been tremendous to watch and
[130]
to see I'm just being fortunate that
[133]
I've been there if you see any consensus
[138]
developing around what background makes
[141]
for a good CDO what are the skills in
[144]
the CDO needs yeah no that's a very very
[146]
good question and that my view has been
[148]
evolving on that one to you over the
[150]
last few years right as I've had these
[152]
experiences so I'll jump to the
[156]
completely so maybe panel to answer your
[159]
question as opposed to what I started
[161]
out there the CEO has to be the change
[166]
agent in chief for the organization
[169]
that's really the role of the senior so
[171]
yes there's the technical chops that you
[174]
have to have and you have to be able to
[176]
deal with you know people who are who
[179]
have advanced technical degrees and to
[181]
get them to move forward but you do have
[184]
to change the entire organization and
[186]
you have to be adept going after the
[191]
culture changing it
[193]
you can't get frustrated with all the
[196]
pushback that's in available you have to
[200]
almost develop it as an art as you move
[203]
forward and aggressive not just bottom
[206]
up and you know natural we'll also talk
[208]
now and I think that's probably where
[211]
the up gets the most interesting because
[213]
you've got a push for change even at the
[215]
top but you can push you know just so
[218]
far without really be mailing everything
[222]
that you're trying to do and so I think
[224]
if I had to pick one afternoon it would
[227]
be that the video has to be the change
[229]
they're going to have to be adapt and
[232]
addressing the culture of the
[233]
organization and moving it forward
[235]
you're laying out all of these sort of
[237]
character traits that someone has to be
[239]
indefatigable inspirational true
[242]
visionary you also said during the
[246]
keynote you have six months to really
[249]
make your first push you have six month
[252]
the first six months are so important
[253]
when we talk about presidents it's the
[254]
first 100 days describe what what do you
[257]
mean by that you have six months so I'm
[261]
talking to mainly about a large
[263]
organisation like an IBM a large
[265]
enterprise when you go in
[268]
[Music]
[269]
the key the key observation is it's a
[272]
functioning organization it's a going
[275]
concern it's already making money is
[277]
doing stuff like running down although
[283]
they have their own needs and demands so
[288]
very quickly you can just become
[291]
somebody who ends up servicing multiple
[293]
demands that come from different
[294]
business units different people and so
[299]
that's kind of one aspect of the way the
[301]
organization takes over if you don't
[303]
really come up with an overarching
[304]
strategy the other way the
[306]
organization's take over is typically
[309]
large organizations are very silent and
[313]
even have the lower levels you have you
[317]
know people who develop little fiefdom
[320]
when they control that data
[323]
and they say this is why I'm not gonna
[324]
let anybody else have it they're the
[326]
only ones who really understand that
[328]
curve and so you're pretty much unless
[332]
we were able to get them to align to a
[334]
much larger form we will never be able
[336]
to break down those silos culturally
[338]
just because of the way they set up so
[340]
it's a pervasive problem it goes across
[342]
the board and I think when you walk in
[345]
you've got that for pollen honeymoon
[347]
period or whatever my estimate is based
[350]
on my experience six months if you don't
[352]
have it down in six months in terms of
[355]
that ladder Falls that you're going to
[357]
push forward that you can use to at
[359]
least align everybody with the wizard
[361]
you're not going really succeed in
[364]
succeed tactically but not in a
[366]
strategic sense you're about to
[368]
undertake the largest acquisition in
[370]
IBM's history and as the chief data
[373]
officer you must be thinking right now
[375]
about what that's going to mean for data
[377]
governance and and data integration how
[380]
are you preparing for an acquisition
[382]
that large yeah so you know the
[384]
acquisition has still gotta work through
[385]
all the regulations and so also there's
[387]
just so much we can do it's much more
[389]
from a planning standpoint that we can
[391]
do things I'll give you a sense of how
[393]
I've been thinking about it but we've
[395]
been doing acquisitions before so in
[398]
that sense we do have a set process for
[400]
how we go about in terms of evaluating
[403]
data how are we going to manage the data
[408]
the interesting aspect that was
[412]
different for me in this one is I also
[415]
brought back on our data strategy itself
[418]
and tried to understand now that there's
[422]
going to be this big acquisition of news
[425]
following the planning standpoint how
[428]
should I be prepared to change with
[430]
regard to that activation and because we
[435]
were so aligned with the overall IBM
[438]
business strategy to pursue cognition I
[441]
think you could see that in my remarks
[444]
that when you push forward AI in a large
[448]
enterprise you very quickly run into
[451]
this multi-cloud issue where you've got
[454]
what there's different clouds but also
[456]
on cram and private clouds and you have
[459]
to manage across all that and that
[461]
becomes a pain point that we have to
[462]
scale the scale you have to get past the
[464]
pain point and so we were already
[467]
thinking about that we actually I I just
[472]
did a check after the you know the
[474]
acquisition was announced asking you
[477]
know my team to figure out well how
[479]
standardized are we with red have looked
[482]
and I find that we're actually
[485]
completely standardized across with Red
[487]
Hat Linux we pretty much will have use
[490]
cases ready to go and I think that's a
[492]
facet of their you know because we were
[494]
so aligned to the business strategy to
[496]
begin with
[497]
so we were discovering that pain point
[500]
just of all our customer here and so the
[504]
corporation acted as it did in some
[507]
extent they were already ready to go
[508]
with use cases that we can take directly
[510]
to our clients and customers I think it
[512]
also has to do with the fact that we've
[514]
had a partnership with pretty studio do
[518]
you think people understand AI in a
[520]
business context I actually think that
[523]
that's people don't really understand
[525]
that's was the biggest in my mind anyway
[528]
the biggest barrier to the business
[531]
strategy that we have embarked on you
[533]
know several years ago to take AI or
[536]
completion to the elephant people never
[538]
really understood it and so our own data
[541]
strategy became one of enabling IBM
[545]
itself to become an AI enterprise and
[549]
used that of a showcase for clients and
[551]
customers and all of the journey in the
[553]
last 50 years that are meeting at IBM
[555]
we've become more heaping putting
[558]
forward more and more collateral but
[562]
also technology but also you know
[564]
business process change ideas
[565]
organizational change ideas so that our
[568]
clients and customers can see exactly
[570]
how it's done
[572]
not that it's perfect yet but back to
[575]
their benefits right they don't make the
[577]
same mistakes that we do and so we've
[579]
become
[581]
your colleagues have been covering this
[583]
concert so they will know that it's
[585]
become more and more clear exactly what
[588]
we brought you made an interesting
[590]
comment in the keynote this morning you
[592]
said nobody understands AI in a business
[594]
context what did you mean by that so in
[597]
a business context what does it look
[599]
like right what does the eye look like
[602]
from okay all right well we can talk
[611]
about this a little bit too well well I
[614]
think we understand AI you know as
[616]
Amazon echo right we we understand it
[619]
isn't as an interface medium but but I
[621]
think what he was getting at is that
[624]
impacting business processes is a lot
[627]
more complicated right and so we tend to
[629]
think of AI in terms of how we relate to
[633]
technology rather than how technology
[635]
changes the rules right and clearly
[637]
clearly it's such a it's on the consumer
[639]
side we've all grasped this and we all
[641]
are excited by its possibilities but in
[643]
terms of the business context it's the
[645]
season
[647]
[Laughter]
[651]
to your question with regard to how a
[655]
INF Innocence Project consumer context
[659]
everybody understand but in a business
[662]
context water that really mean that's
[663]
difficult for people to understand but
[665]
eventually it's all around making
[666]
decisions but in my mind it's not the
[669]
big decision it's not the decisions that
[671]
we regatta a virus and stop those
[674]
decisions
[675]
it's the thousands and thousands of
[677]
little decisions that are made in a day
[680]
in and night out by people who are
[682]
working the rank-and-file who are
[684]
actually working to different causes
[686]
that's what you really need to go after
[688]
and if you're able to breathe out it
[691]
completely changes the process and
[694]
you're going to have just such a lot
[695]
more out of it not just in terms of
[698]
collectivity but also in terms of new
[699]
ideas that need to revenue and
[701]
new products for several summers that's
[704]
what a business business AI enterprise
[707]
looks like and that's what we've been
[709]
bringing forward and showcasing what
[712]
today's keynote actually at Sonya one of
[716]
our data governance people SMEs who
[719]
works on metadata generation which is a
[722]
very difficult manual problem little bit
[724]
data about data specifically labeling
[726]
data so that a business person for the
[728]
standard it's all being done manually
[731]
but now it's done automatically using AR
[733]
and it's completely changed the process
[735]
but Sonia is the person he's at the
[737]
forefront of that and I don't think
[739]
people really understand that they think
[741]
in terms of AI and business and they
[743]
think this is going to be you know
[745]
somebody who the data scientists
[747]
technologists you know somebody who's a
[749]
very talented technical engineer but
[752]
it's not that it's actually the
[753]
rank-and-file people who've been working
[756]
these business processes now working
[758]
with an intelligent system to take it to
[761]
the next level is the change agent in
[766]
chief because it is it does require so
[769]
much buy-in from as you say the
[771]
rank-and-file it's not just the top
[773]
decision makers that you're trying to
[775]
persuade effective change at all levels
[780]
stop down bottom up laughs early you
[783]
have to you have to go out to it across
[785]
the board and it talks in terms of
[788]
talking about the data it's not just
[790]
data for data's sake you need to
[792]
you need to talk about it in terms that
[793]
a business person can understand during
[795]
the keynote you described an earlier
[798]
work that you were doing with the NBA
[801]
can you tell our viewers a little bit
[802]
about that and Edmund sort of how the
[804]
data had to tell a story yeah so that
[807]
was in my first go-around with IBM from
[810]
1990 through 97 I was with IBM research
[814]
of the Watson Research Lab as a research
[816]
staff member and I created this program
[819]
called advanced scout for the National
[822]
Basketball Association ended up being
[824]
used by every team on the NBA and it
[827]
would essentially suggest who to put in
[830]
the lineup you know your mapping lineup
[832]
and so forth by looking at a lot of game
[835]
data and it was particularly useful here
[836]
in the playoff game the major lesson
[840]
that came out of that experience for me
[842]
at that time right this is before
[844]
Moneyball and before you know all the
[847]
stuff it was like 90 93 92 I think if
[849]
you google it you would still see
[850]
articles about this but the main lesson
[853]
that was you know that came out for me
[855]
was the first time when the program
[857]
identified a pattern and suggested that
[861]
to a coach during a playoff game where
[863]
they were down to zero it suggested they
[865]
start to back up player and the coach
[868]
was just completely flabbergasted and
[871]
said there's no way I'm going to do this
[872]
this is the kind of thing that could get
[874]
me you know and not only get me fired to
[876]
make me look really silly and it hit me
[879]
then that there was context that was
[882]
missing but you know the coach could not
[884]
really make a decision and the way we
[886]
solve it then was we tied it to the
[889]
snippets of video when those two players
[891]
were on call and then they
[893]
we made the decision that went on the
[894]
one that game and so for today's today's
[897]
a I system can actually fathom all that
[900]
automatically from the video itself and
[904]
I think that's what's really advanced
[906]
the technology and the approaches that
[909]
we've got today to move forward as
[912]
quickly as they have and that they can
[913]
hold across the board right you know in
[916]
the sense of a consumer setting but now
[918]
also in the sense of a business setting
[921]
where we are applying it pretty much to
[923]
every business parcels that we have
[926]
wonderful thank you so much for coming
[928]
back on the cube oh oh is pleasure
[930]
talking to you it's my pleasure thank
[932]
you i'm rebecca night for paul g眉len we
[934]
will have more from the cubes live
[935]
coverage of IBM CDO coming up in just a
[938]
little bit