INSOLVENT DEFINITION: A NEW FOCUS FOR TORONTO BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE - YouTube

Channel: Ira Smith

[70]
in solvent definition a new focus for Toronto bankruptcy trustee the oxford
[76]
dictionary definition is insolvent adjective unable to pay debts out
[80]
section 2 of the bankruptcy and insolvency act RSC 1985 cv3 BIA defines
[89]
insolvent person as insolvent person means a person who is not bankrupt and
[94]
who resides carries on business or has property in Canada whose liabilities to
[99]
creditors provable as claims under this act amount to $1,000 and a who is for
[105]
any reason unable to meet his obligations as they generally become do
[108]
be who has ceased paying his current obligations in the ordinary course of
[113]
business as they generally become do or see the aggregate of whose property is
[118]
not at a fair valuation sufficient or if disposed of it a fairly conducted sale
[124]
under legal process would not be sufficient to enable payment of all his
[128]
obligations do an accruing to insolvent person refers to both individuals and
[133]
companies the BIA definition incorporates the common English
[137]
definition the P definition also incorporates the accounting concept of
[141]
net worth core Mosby fast 2018 o NSC 6044 Canley mr. and mrs. Kaur Moe's got
[150]
a judgment against their neighbors mr. and mrs. fast the small claims court
[155]
issued the judgment for 25565 dot sixty-four cents this judgment comes
[161]
about from problems arising from flooding in their home which was
[164]
triggered by the fasts after the judgment was given the fasts were
[168]
contacted by mr. core most licensed insolvency trustee trustee the trustee
[173]
advice that mr. fast had submitted a consumer proposal under the via numerous
[177]
months previously on August 24th 2016 mr fast did not previously mention anything
[184]
about his consumer proposal or his subsequent filing of an assignment in
[188]
bankruptcy fifteen days after the Corps most plaintiffs started enforcement of
[192]
the judgment by serving a notice of examination on mrs. fast
[196]
she made an assignment in bankruptcy under the be on April 25th 2017 in their
[201]
different bankruptcy filings each of the fasts attested in their respective sworn
[205]
statement of affairs that their home in Queenston Ontario home was worth six
[211]
hundred thirty thousand dollars mr. and mrs. Kaur most provided evidence
[214]
by way of an expert witness appraisal who also testified in court showing that
[219]
the home was considerably underestimated in the BIA filings by mr. fast on August
[223]
24th 2016 and mrs. fast on April 25th 2017 when she made an assignment in
[229]
bankruptcy the cor most lawyers stated that when a reasonable value is
[233]
designated to the home neither mr. fast nor mrs. fast were insolvent when their
[237]
corresponding filings were made under the BIA they were obviously relying on
[241]
the fact that each of mr. and mrs. fast really had a positive net worth
[245]
mr. and mrs. poor Moe's were looking for an order under the BIA I am le mr. fast
[251]
consumer proposal as well as if required his 2014 bankruptcy as well as to
[257]
annulling mrs. fast bankruptcy the courts analysis
[262]
fasts did not challenge the expert appraisal opinion the court accepted the
[267]
experts appraisal as being the value of the home on the relevant dates of mr.
[270]
and mrs. fasts respective filings under the BIA the court looked at the
[274]
insolvent definition in the BIA in her bankruptcy filing
[278]
mrs. fast filed her statement of monthly income in expenses according to the
[282]
statement her monthly expenses exceed her monthly income by 2010 dollars when
[287]
looking at the definition of insolvent the court concluded that mrs. fast was
[292]
unable to meet her obligations and had stopped paying her current obligations
[295]
notwithstanding that the court found that mrs. fast probably understated the
[299]
value of her interest in the home the court was not persuaded to annul her
[303]
bankruptcy as she met the definition of an insolvent person as for mr. fast the
[309]
court decided it would not annul his consumer proposal the judge went on to
[313]
say that even if he was persuaded to do so
[315]
mr. fast was still a bankrupt and the judge had no evidence for the
[318]
proposition that his bankruptcy should also be annulled so the judge did not
[323]
grant the application the fasts are under their respective BIA proceedings
[327]
and mr. and mrs. poor Mose can file their claim with the fasts trustee are
[331]
you insolvent are you unable to pay your debts as they come due are your bills
[336]
past due and you don't know how you are going to pay them if so then you are
[340]
insolvent and we can help eliminate your pain
[342]
the iris Smith team has decades and generations of experience helping people
[347]
and companies in financial trouble whether it is a consumer proposal debt
[351]
settlement plan a larger personal or corporate restructuring proposal that
[356]
settlement plan or is a last resort bankruptcy we have the experience call
[361]
us today for your free consultation I hope you enjoyed the video the IRA
[368]
Smith team is available to help you at anytime
[371]
we offer sound advice and a solid plan for starting over starting now so that
[377]
you'll be well on your way to a debt-free life in no time for more
[381]
information on a no cost basis please visit our website or call us our website
[387]
and telephone details are coming right up now
[405]
you