A Test to Work Out if You're a Good Person - YouTube

Channel: The School of Life

[4]
There is really only one question you ever need to direct at someone to work out whether
[10]
or not they are a good person - and that is, with deliberate simplicity: Do you think you
[17]
are a good person? And to this there is only one acceptable answer. People who are genuinely
[25]
good, people who know about kindness, patience, forgiveness, compromise, apology and gentleness
[32]
always, always answer no.
[39]
One cannot both be a good person and at the same time feel either blameless or pure inside.
[46]
Goodness is, one might say, the unique consequence of a keen and ongoing awareness of one’s
[52]
capacity to be bad, that is, to be thoughtless, cruel, self-righteous and deaf to the legitimate
[60]
needs of others. Only on the basis of a perpetual vigilant impression that one hasn’t got
[67]
the right to judge oneself above suspicion, does one come anywhere near the ethical high
[73]
standard that merits the title of ‘good’ (a word one can still never use of oneself).
[81]
The price of being genuinely good has to be a constant suspicion that one might be a monster
[88]
- combined with a fundamental hesitation about labelling anyone else monstrous. A guilty
[95]
conscience is the bedrock of virtue.
[99]
Correspondingly, only properly bad people don’t lie awake at night worrying about
[105]
their characters. It has generally never occurred to the most difficult or dangerous people
[110]
on the planet that they might be lacking. Their sickness is to locate evil always firmly
[116]
outside of themselves: it’s by definition invariably the others who are to blame, the
[122]
others who are cruel, sinful, lacking in judgement and mistaken. And their job is to take these
[128]
impure people down and correct their evils in the fire of their own righteousness.
[136]
It is a grim paradox that the worst deeds that humans have ever been guilty of have
[141]
been carried out by people with an easy conscience, people who felt they were definitely on the
[147]
side of angels, people who were entirely sure that they had justice in hand. What unites
[154]
the people who report their neighbours to the secret police, the crowds who burn their
[158]
victims at stakes while dancing around their agonised bodies, the government officials
[163]
who set up purification camps and the nations that wipe out their enemies with special barbarism
[171]
is their consistent and overwhelming sense that they are doing the right thing - in the
[177]
eyes of god, history or Truth. When trying to understand why people do evil things, never
[185]
start from the position of imagining that they understood them as evil; remember that
[191]
they would have carried out their nastiness cocksure that they were paragons. An impassioned
[197]
feeling of being the instrument of justice has been at the heart of humanity’s most
[202]
appallingly unkind moments.
[206]
It is a hallmark of all the cruellest ages of history that certain groups decide that
[212]
they have landed on a cause that gives them a monopoly on justice: that a particular god
[218]
has given them a special mission to eradicate sin or when their study of economics or biology
[224]
have shown them one true path to an upright future - at which point there is no limit
[229]
to the number of eggs that can be broken to concoct the righteous omelette. And by implication,
[236]
the kindest stretches of history are those when a majority daily awake wondering how
[242]
they might go easy on others because they are so flawed themselves, when a sense of
[248]
scepticism and apology dominates every social exchange, when one is constantly charitable
[254]
in word and deed from a sense of impeachability - and when people can always readily forgive
[261]
because they know how much in them needs to be forgiven.
[268]
"Who am I?" is a book designed to help us create a psychological portrait of who we are; with the use of some unusual, oblique, entertaining and playful prompts.