馃攳
'So you won't take down lies?': Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez challenges Facebook CEO - YouTube
Channel: Guardian News
[0]
mr. Zuckerberg what year and month did
[2]
you personally first become aware of
[4]
Cambridge analytic ah I'm not I'm not
[10]
sure of the exact time but it was
[13]
probably around the time when it became
[17]
public I think it was around March of
[19]
2018 I could be wrong though mm-hmm when
[21]
did Facebook CEO Oh Cheryl Sandberg
[24]
become aware of Cambridge analytic on oh
[28]
and did anyone on your leadership team
[31]
know about Cambridge analytic apriority
[33]
the card Ian on December 11 2015
[38]
congresswoman I I believe so and that
[41]
some folks were were tracking it
[44]
internally and actually as you're asking
[47]
this I III do think I was aware of
[50]
Cambridge analytic as an entity earlier
[52]
I just I don't know if I was tracking
[54]
how they were using Facebook
[55]
specifically when was the issue
[57]
discussed with your board member Peter
[59]
Thiel
[61]
congresswoman I don't I don't know this
[64]
was the largest data scandal with
[65]
respect to your company that had
[67]
catastrophic impacts on the 2016
[69]
election you don't you don't know well
[71]
congresswoman I'm sure we discussed it
[73]
after it after after we were aware of
[76]
what happened okay you announced
[79]
recently that the official policy of
[81]
Facebook now allows politicians to pay
[83]
to spread disinformation in 2020
[87]
elections and in the future so I just
[89]
want to know how far I can push this I'm
[91]
in the next year under your policy you
[95]
know using census data as well could I
[97]
pay to target predominantly black zip
[99]
codes and advertise them the incorrect
[101]
election date no congresswoman you
[104]
couldn't we we have even for these
[108]
policies around the newsworthiness
[111]
of content that politicians say in the
[113]
general principle that I believe that
[115]
but you said you're not going to
[116]
fact-check my ass we have if if anyone
[120]
including a politician is saying things
[122]
that can cause that is calling for
[125]
violence or could risk imminent physical
[128]
harm or voter or census suppression when
[131]
we roll out the census suppress
[133]
policy we will take that content so so
[137]
you will there is some threshold where
[140]
you will fact check political
[142]
advertisements is that where you're
[144]
telling me well
[145]
congresswoman yes and for specific
[147]
things like that where there's imminent
[149]
risk of harm could I run ads targeting
[152]
Republicans in primaries saying that
[154]
they voted for the Green New Deal
[157]
sorry can you repeat that would I be
[161]
able to run advertisements on Facebook
[163]
targeting Republicans in primary saying
[165]
that they voted for the green new deal I
[167]
mean if you're not fact-checking
[168]
political advertisements I'm trying to
[170]
understand the bounds here don't know if
[177]
I'll be able to do that do you see a
[180]
potential problem here with a complete
[182]
lack of fact-checking on political
[184]
advertisements
[185]
well congresswoman I think lying is bad
[187]
and I think if you were to run an ad
[189]
that had a lie that would be bad that's
[191]
different from it being from from or in
[196]
our position the right thing to do to
[198]
prevent your constituents or people in
[201]
an election from seeing that you had
[203]
lied so we can so you won't take down
[207]
lies or you will take down lives I think
[209]
it's just a pretty simple yes or no
[211]
congresswoman might talk about spin I'm
[214]
talking about actual yes democracy I
[218]
believe that people should be able to
[219]
see for themselves what politicians that
[222]
they may or may not vote for you won't
[224]
take so you won't you may flag that it's
[227]
wrong but you won't take it down
[229]
congresswoman it's a it depends on the
[233]
context that it shows up Organic Post
[235]
one question one more question in your
[238]
ongoing dinner parties with far-right
[240]
figures some of who advanced the
[242]
conspiracy theory that white supremacy
[243]
is a hoax did you discuss so-called
[246]
social media bias against conservatives
[248]
and do you believe there is a bias
[251]
congresswoman I don't remember
[256]
everything that was in the Senate in the
[257]
course array I'll move on can you
[259]
explain why you've named the Daily
[260]
Caller
[261]
a publication white well documented
[264]
with ties to white supremacists as an
[266]
official fact checker for facebook
[268]
congresswoman sure we actually don't
[270]
appoint the independent fact checkers
[271]
they go through an independent
[273]
organization called the independent fact
[275]
checking network that has a rigorous
[278]
standard for who they allow to to serve
[281]
as a fact checker so you would say that
[285]
white supremacist tide publications meet
[289]
a rigorous standard for fact-checking
[294]
Thank You congresswoman I would say that
[297]
we're not the one assessing that that
[300]
standard the international fact-checking
[302]
network is the one who is setting that
[303]
standard
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage