Economic Order Quantity deeper understanding. - YouTube

Channel: Koncept Education

[0]
While trying to figure out that what quantity should we order to the supplier every time,
[5]
we went through a lot of real and book examples and situations.
[9]
Real situations were very friends and easily understandable.
[12]
But the book situations were very rigid.
[14]
And moreover we felt like every point said just one thing that what difference will it
[23]
make if I order small or medium or large quantities at the same time as the purchase cost of all
[31]
of them have been same.
[33]
Then I realized that even though the purchase cost of all of these are same there is something
[38]
called as total ordering cost and total carrying cost.
[42]
The total of these two was called as associated cost.
[46]
Because these costs are associated with purchasing of the raw material.
[50]
And I realized, even though everything seems to be constant they were variables.
[56]
Why?
[57]
Because I'll tell you why.
[59]
The smaller quantity I ordered, the number of times I had to order was too much.
[65]
How will I find out my ordering cost?Very simple.
[67]
What was my whole year's requirement?
[70]
5000.
[71]
So what am I doing?
[72]
Whenever I have to compute the number of orders, whenever I have to compute the number of orders,
[75]
then in terms of formula, can I say that we are doing this: My annual requirement of raw
[81]
materials divided by my quantity, that how much quantity am I ordering, correct?
[85]
Just like how we did it here.
[88]
What is my annual requirement?
[90]
5000 divided by my quantity.
[91]
How much quantity am I ordering?
[93]
100.
[94]
So how much will be my number of orders?
[96]
50.
[97]
Similarly, 5000 divided by 500.
[98]
How many orders will I make?
[101]
10.
[102]
Similarly, 5000 divided by 1000.
[103]
How many orders will I make?
[104]
5.
[105]
So I found out how to calculate the number of orders, then I realized that ordering cost
[111]
per order is constant, known and fixed and given to me in the question every single time.
[117]
So all I had to do is find my total ordering cost, which is very simple.
[121]
If I know the number of orders is 50, 10 or 5 and I know that I always have to multiply
[127]
them by 16 I can easily compute my total ordering cost, which is 50 into 16, 800 and 10 into
[135]
16, 160 and 5 into 16, 80.
[139]
Then I found out, ok the as the number of orders, as the number or orders increases,
[145]
if the orders are 5 then the ordering cost is less, if the orders are less, then the
[150]
ordering cost will increase.
[151]
And if there are 50 orders, then our ordering cost will increase a lot.
[156]
So as I realized that the number of orders play a very important role in my ordering
[161]
cost and my number of orders depend upon, my number of orders depends upon my order
[167]
size.
[168]
So as I increase the order size my ordering cost decreases, then I stood for one more
[175]
thing, that there should be also carrying cost, then we tried to understand the carrying
[180]
cost.
[181]
What is the carrying cost?
[183]
The cost of taking care of what is purchased.
[185]
Then I realized that if I'm bringing only 100 units with me then my production pattern
[191]
is going to be or my raw material consumption pattern is going to be something like this
[194]
100 units will be received and consumed.
[196]
100 units will be received and consumed.
[197]
100 units will be received and consumed.
[198]
100 units will be received and consumed.
[200]
So it is going to be something like this, so because my carrying cost was given to me
[205]
as per unit per annum basis.
[207]
I had to find out the average of it.
[210]
So whatever quantity I order, 100 quantity if I've ordered, the average is going to be
[216]
maximum 100, minimum 0, even if I order 1000 at a time, my average is going to be maximum
[223]
1000, minimum 0.
[225]
So what I can do is I can simply do this, that whatever quantity I'm ordering I can
[230]
just divide it by 2 and multiply it by C and this is how I can find out my total carrying
[236]
cost.
[237]
Surprisingly, I found out a relationship that the total ordering cost and the total carrying
[242]
cost, not the ordering cost not the carrying cost, the total of them - they have an inverse
[247]
relationship.
[248]
Now because of that when I studied that inverse relationship I found out that one thing.
[254]
If we order 100, then purchase price will be 50000, if I order in lots of 500, then
[260]
what is the purchase price?
[262]
50000 only.
[263]
Because whether I order in lots of 100s or 500s, during the whole year how much do I
[267]
have to order?
[268]
Only 5000 we have to order.
[271]
And what is the cost of every raw material?
[273]
It is only Rs. 10.
[274]
So I'm going to incur a cost of 50000, 50000 irrespective of any order size.
[280]
But I was quick to realize that if I order 100 then my total ordering cost and total
[286]
carrying cost will be less than that of 500.
[290]
And that is why, if I order in lots of 100, then I'll get my raw material, at what cost?
[299]
At the cost of 51000.
[302]
Otherwise if we order together 500 units, then I'll get a cost of 51500.
[308]
So I do definitely know that ordering in lots of 100 is better than ordering in lots of
[315]
500.
[316]
But is it the most optimal quantity?
[319]
Is there any other quantity of order which is more beneficial?
[324]
How do I find that?