Did People Ever Really Put Crocodiles in Moats? - YouTube

Channel: Today I Found Out

[7]
A
[22]
common
[34]
image in pop-culture is that of a castle moat filled to the brim with water and hungry crocodiles.
[40]
So did anyone ever actually do this?
[43]
The short answer is that it doesn’t appear so.
[47]
That said, while there’s no known documented instance of crocodiles intentionally being
[52]
put into moats, we do know of at least one castle that had (and has, in fact) a moat
[58]
full of bears

[60]
Before we get to that and why crocodiles in moats are probably not the best idea in the
[64]
world, or at least not a very efficient use of resources if your concern was really defence
[69]
of a fortress, we should address the fact that the common image most people have in
[74]
their heads of a moat isn’t exactly representative of what historical moats usually looked like.
[81]
To begin with, moats have been around seemingly as long as humans have had need of protecting
[86]
a structure or area, with documented instances of them appearing everywhere from Ancient
[91]
Egypt to slightly more modern times around certain Native American settlements.
[96]
And, of course, there are countless examples of moats being used throughout European history.
[101]
In many cases, however, these moats were little more than empty pits dug around a particular
[106]
piece of land or property- water filled moats were something of a rarity.
[110]
You see, unless a natural source of water was around, maintaining an artificial moat
[114]
filled with water required a lot of resources to avoid the whole thing just turning into
[119]
a stinking cesspool of algae and biting bugs, as is wont to happen in standing water.
[122]
As with artificial ponds constructed on certain wealthy individuals’ estates, these would
[127]
have to be regularly drained and cleaned, then filled back up to keep things from becoming
[131]
putrid.
[132]
Of course, if one had a natural flowing water source nearby, some of these problems could
[137]
be avoided.
[138]
But, in the end, it turns out a water filled moat isn’t actually that much more effective
[143]
than an empty one at accomplishing the goal of protecting a fortress.
[147]
And as for putting crocodiles (or alligators) in them, introducing such animals to a region,
[152]
beyond being quite expensive if not their native habitat, is also potentially dangerous
[156]
if the animals got out.
[158]
Again, all this while not really making the act of conquering a fortress that much more
[162]
difficult- so little payoff for the extra cost of maintaining crocodiles.
[168]
Unsurprisingly from this, outside of a legend we’ll get to shortly, there doesn’t appear
[174]
to be any known documented cases of anyone intentionally putting crocodiles or alligators
[179]
into their water filled moats.
[182]
It should also be mentioned here that while at first glance it would appear that the key
[186]
purpose of a moat is to defend against soldiers attacking at the walls, they were often actually
[192]
constructed with the idea of stopping soldiers under the ground.
[196]
You see, a technique favoured since ancient times for breaching cities, fortresses and
[201]
fortified positions was to simply dig tunnels below any walls surrounding the position and
[207]
then intentionally let them collapse, bringing part of the wall above that section tumbling
[211]
down.
[212]
Eventually this was accomplished by use of explosives like gunpowder, but before this
[216]
a more simple method was to cart a bunch of tinder into the tunnel at the appropriate
[220]
point and set the whole thing ablaze.
[223]
The idea here was, after all your diggers were out, to destroy the support beams used
[229]
to keep the tunnel from collapsing while digging.
[231]
If all went as planned, both the tunnel and the wall above it would then collapse.
[235]
To get around this very effective form of breaching fortifications, moats would be dug
[240]
as deeply as possible around the fortification, sometimes until diggers reached bedrock.
[245]
If a natural source of water was around, surrounding the fortress with water was a potential additional
[249]
benefit over the dry pit at stopping such tunneling.
[253]
Either way, beyond making tunneling more difficult (or practically impossible), dry and wet moats,
[258]
of course, helped dissuade above ground attacks as well thanks to moats being quite good at
[263]
limiting an enemy’s use of siege weaponry.
[265]
In particular, devices such as battering rams are rendered almost entirely useless in the
[271]
presence of a large moat.
[273]
Though the later advent of weapons such as trebuchets made moats less effective overall,
[277]
they still proved to be formidable barrier capable of kneecapping a direct assault on
[283]
a castle’s walls.
[284]
All this said, it wasn’t as if proud moat owners didn’t put anything in them.
[289]
There are plenty of ways to beef up moat defences without the need for water and crocodiles.
[294]
Pretty much anything that slows an enemy’s advance works well.
[298]
And, better year, anything that is so daunting it deters an attack at all.
[304]
In fact, archaeological surveys of moats have found evidence of things like stinging bushes
[308]
having once grown throughout some moats.
[311]
Whether these were intentionally planted on the part of the moat owners or just a byproduct
[316]
of having a patch of land they left unattended for years at a time isn’t entirely clear.
[322]
But it doesn’t seem too farfetched to think this may have been intentional in some cases.
[327]
As you might imagine, wading through stinging or thorny plants while arrows and rocks and
[331]
the like are raining down at you from above wasn’t exactly tops on people’s lists
[336]
of things to do.
[338]
As for moats that were filled with water, while filling them with crocodiles or alligators
[342]
wasn’t seemingly something anyone did, some savvy castle owners did fill them with fish
[346]
giving them a nice private fishery.
[348]
(As mentioned, artificial ponds built for this purpose were also sometimes a thing for
[353]
the ultra-wealthy, functioning both as a status symbol, given maintaining such was incredibly
[359]
expensive, and a great source of food year round).
[363]
Moving back to the dry bed moats, when not just leaving them as a simple dug pit or planting
[368]
things meant to slow enemy troops, it does appear at least in some rare instances fortress
[373]
owners would put dangerous animals in them, though seemingly, again, more as a status
[380]
symbol than actually being particularly effective at deterring enemy troops.
[384]
Most famously, at Krumlov Castle in the Czech Republic there exists something that is most
[389]
aptly described as a “bear moat”, located between the castle’s first and second courtyard.
[396]
When exactly this practice started and exactly why has been lost to history, with the earliest
[400]
known documented reference to the bear moat going back to 1707.
[405]
Whether designed to serve as a stark warning to potential intruders, a status symbol, or
[414]
both, the castle’s grizzliest residents were tended to by a designated bearkeeper
[419]
until around the early 19th century when the practice ceased.
[422]
This changed again in 1857 when the castle’s then resident noble, Karl zu Schwarzenberg,
[427]
acquired a pair of bears from nearby Transylvania intent on reviving the tradition.
[433]
From that moment onward, outside of a brief lapse in the late 19th century, the castle’s
[437]
moat has almost always contained at least one bear.
[440]
Today the bears are most definitely completely for show, and each year bear-themed celebrations
[446]
are held at Christmas and on the bears’ birthdays during which children bring the
[450]
bears presents.
[451]
If bears aren’t you thing, Wilhelm V, the Prince Regent of Bavaria, in the late 16th
[457]
century supposedly kept both lions and a leopard in the moat of Trausnitz Castle while he lived
[464]
there.
[465]
However, again, it appears that Prince Wilhelm kept the animals more for show and fun than
[469]
he did for defence.
[470]
Beyond dangerous creatures, his moat also contained pheasants and a rabbit run.
[475]
Moving back to crocodiles being put in moats, the earliest reference to something like this
[479]
(though seemingly just a legend), appears to be the legend of the Coccodrillo di Castelnuovo.
[485]
This story is recounted by the 19th and 20th century historian and politician Benedetto
[491]
Croce in his “Neapolitan Stories and Legends“:
[494]
In that castle, there was a moat under the level of the sea, dark, humid, where the prisoners,
[499]
who they want to more strictly castigate, were usually put.
[502]
When, all of a sudden, they started to notice with astonishment that, from there, the prisoners
[507]
disappeared.
[508]
Did they escape?
[509]
How?
[510]
Put a tighter surveillance and a new guest inside there, one day they saw, unexpected
[513]
and terrifying scene, from a hole hidden in the moat, a monster, a crocodile entering
[518]
and, with its jaws, it grasped for the legs the prisoner, and dragged him to the sea to
[523]
eat him.
[524]
Rather than kill the creature, the guards decided to make the fearsome creature an “executor
[529]
of justice”, sending prisoners condemned to death to meet their end in its toothy maw.
[535]
Exactly where the crocodile came from and when this supposedly happened depends on which
[539]
version of the legend you consult, though our favourite version suggests that Queen
[544]
Joanna II smuggled it over to Naples from Egypt sometime in the 15th century with the
[549]
sole intention of feeding her many, many lovers to it.
[553]
A consistent element in most versions of the legend is that the beast bit off more than
[557]
it could chew when it tried to eat a leg of a giant horse, ultimately choking on it.
[563]
Of course, this is generally thought to be nothing more than a legend, with no evidence
[568]
that it actually occurred or even exactly when.
[571]
At least the story does show that the idea of a crocodile in a moat isn’t just something
[576]
found in modern
[674]
pop culture.