Why American Cities Are Broke - The Growth Ponzi Scheme [ST03] - YouTube

Channel: Not Just Bikes

[4]
[Music]
[6]
welcome to the third video in my strong
[8]
town series if you have no idea what
[10]
strong towns is about you might want to
[12]
watch the first two videos but
[13]
it's not strictly necessary
[17]
american cities are famous for car
[19]
dependent sprawl
[21]
that's probably one of the first things
[22]
most people associate with america after
[24]
apple pie
[25]
baseball and driving and soul crushing
[27]
traffic
[28]
but this wasn't always the case american
[31]
cities don't have to be sprawling
[33]
just because the country itself is big
[35]
and up until the second world war
[38]
they weren't they were just as compact
[40]
as cities found
[41]
almost anywhere else but after the 1940s
[45]
america started on a totally different
[47]
pattern of development and began their
[48]
great suburban experiment
[51]
but herein lies the problem because this
[53]
american pattern of development builds
[55]
places that do not financially support
[57]
themselves
[58]
and the only reason they're still there
[59]
is because american cities
[61]
are a ponzi scheme if you don't know
[64]
what a ponzi scheme is there are many
[65]
videos on youtube but the very quick
[67]
explanation is as follows
[69]
a scammer offers an imaginary investment
[71]
opportunity offering a huge return on
[74]
investment
[75]
investor a comes along and invests now
[78]
the scammer doesn't actually have the
[79]
money
[80]
to pay investor a if he wants his money
[82]
out so he takes on another investor b
[85]
he uses the money from investor b to pay
[87]
investor a
[88]
pocketing a little for himself of course
[91]
but how does he pay investor b
[93]
easy he just brings on investors c d
[96]
e and so on this works out
[100]
great for our scammer but the moment
[102]
that growth stops
[103]
he has a very big problem in the end
[106]
all ponzi schemes fail it's just a
[109]
matter of when
[111]
one of the key insights of strong towns
[113]
is that the way that u.s and canadian
[115]
cities have been built
[116]
since world war ii follows exactly this
[119]
model
[120]
american style suburbia is dependent on
[122]
growth to stay financially solvent
[126]
the moment these cities stop growing
[128]
because of a financial crisis a radical
[130]
change in the job market or any one of a
[132]
number of other factors
[133]
everything starts to fall apart strong
[135]
towns calls this
[137]
the growth ponzi scheme now unlike
[140]
financial fraud
[141]
the generation who started this process
[143]
didn't do it intentionally
[145]
after world war ii america was a
[147]
prosperous country
[148]
and with low-cost automobiles available
[151]
it seemed possible that every american
[152]
could own their own house
[154]
on their own piece of land and the
[156]
american dream was born
[158]
this became so central to american
[161]
psychology
[161]
that the idea that suburban development
[164]
provides prosperity
[165]
is taken as fact by almost everyone in
[168]
the country
[168]
and the same goes for canada too part of
[172]
the problem is how suburban growth is
[173]
financed
[174]
when the suburbs began huge amounts of
[177]
money from federal and state governments
[178]
were given to cities to build out their
[180]
suburbs
[181]
this still goes on today for example
[184]
when a city wants to build a new road or
[186]
freeway
[186]
usually less than a quarter of the
[188]
funding comes from the city itself
[190]
the overwhelming majority comes from the
[192]
department of transportation
[194]
and other higher levels of government so
[196]
cities don't have to pay
[198]
very much to build new infrastructure
[200]
but they do get a big influx of tax
[202]
revenue
[202]
from the new developments that spring up
[205]
this brings us to the first
[206]
problem it encourages cities to build
[209]
lots of new developments
[210]
even if they don't make any financial
[212]
sense
[213]
of course all this new cheap
[214]
infrastructure comes with a very
[216]
important catch
[217]
the city may get it built for cheap but
[219]
the city is ultimately responsible for
[222]
paying to maintain that infrastructure
[224]
forever on the surface this is fine
[228]
governments want to invest in their
[230]
cities because they are the engines of
[231]
economic growth
[232]
and for the city this should be fine too
[235]
they collect taxes from the new
[237]
developments that spring up around that
[238]
infrastructure
[239]
and those taxes go towards future
[241]
maintenance
[243]
the big problem begins if there isn't
[244]
enough tax revenue collected
[246]
to cover the replacement cost of the
[248]
infrastructure and that is exactly what
[250]
has happened with car dependent suburbia
[252]
because car centric sprawl is
[254]
horrendously expensive
[257]
to explain this problem further i'll use
[259]
the example of a quote
[260]
ideal development that is often used as
[263]
an example by strong towns
[265]
imagine a new suburban housing
[267]
development on the edge of town
[269]
in this case the developer completely
[271]
pays for the street
[272]
and turns it over to the city for
[273]
maintenance the residents move in
[276]
and start paying tax revenue this
[278]
couldn't get any better for the suburban
[280]
municipality
[281]
free development free road bunch of new
[283]
tax revenue
[284]
this is awesome now the municipality in
[287]
this case would put a little bit of
[288]
money aside
[289]
for the maintenance of that road so what
[291]
would this look like
[292]
in an american suburb well at first
[295]
streets don't need a lot of maintenance
[297]
they may require some minor repairs such
[299]
as filling cracks but in general
[300]
new streets are pretty cheap so the
[303]
suburban city's cash flow looks
[304]
something like this
[307]
everything looks pretty great until the
[309]
end of the street's life cycle
[310]
because eventually all streets and roads
[312]
need resurfacing
[314]
so suddenly the graph goes like this
[318]
if the city were just this one street it
[320]
would already be bankrupt
[322]
but cities aren't just one street
[324]
they're made up of hundreds of streets
[326]
and individual developments
[327]
so assuming a new development every
[329]
other year a real growing city's cash
[332]
flow would look something like this
[334]
with new developments covering the cost
[336]
of past developments
[338]
as you can see growth covers the problem
[340]
and the city is financially solvent
[342]
again
[343]
yay this is great let's build more lots
[346]
of asphalt and free parking for everyone
[350]
but when you get a couple of generations
[352]
into the suburban experiment
[354]
the maintenance obligations of the past
[356]
start to catch up with you
[357]
suddenly your suburb's finances start to
[359]
look something like this
[362]
because when you lose money on every
[363]
development you don't make it up in
[366]
volume
[368]
now it's important to note that this is
[370]
an ideal case as this model assumes near
[372]
constant growth
[374]
in reality cities have phases of growth
[376]
and phases of decline and this situation
[378]
is made even worse because these growing
[380]
infrastructure liabilities tend to show
[383]
up just as a period of growth
[385]
is over many americans like to brush
[389]
this off by claiming that cities do
[391]
actually collect enough tax revenue but
[393]
it's all lost to corruption or
[394]
inefficiencies or unions or whatever
[398]
but the reality is that most american
[400]
suburbs collect only a fraction of the
[402]
tax revenue required to actually finance
[404]
their sprawling infrastructure
[407]
strong towns has several case studies
[409]
about this such as this example
[411]
of a suburban road that needed
[413]
resurfacing in order for the residents
[415]
to cover just the cost of their own road
[418]
the city would need an immediate 46
[420]
increase in property tax
[423]
and there are so many other costs to a
[425]
city beyond just roads
[426]
such as sewer and water systems
[428]
sidewalks
[429]
treatment systems pumps water towers
[432]
storm water ponds as well as all the
[435]
operational costs of running a city such
[437]
as police or fire departments
[439]
you can't just brush this off by waving
[441]
your hands in the air and saying
[443]
the efficiencies efficiencies
[445]
efficiencies efficiency worst case
[446]
scenario have no problem with parking
[448]
taxes
[448]
no efficiency i'll link to this and
[452]
other cases by strong towns
[454]
in the description and canada is not
[457]
much better
[458]
an analysis done by the halifax regional
[460]
municipality
[461]
found that the cost to maintain and
[463]
service an urban home are well less than
[465]
half that of a suburban home
[467]
but in most north american cities the
[469]
suburban home pays less property tax
[472]
this leads to an effective subsidy for
[474]
car dependent suburbia
[476]
now don't get me wrong our cities need
[479]
affordable housing
[480]
but the solution is not to subsidize the
[482]
least efficient
[483]
least sustainable developments in the
[485]
city but that topic deserves a lot more
[488]
explanation so
[489]
i'll talk about that in more detail in a
[491]
future video
[493]
so it's clear that car dependent suburbs
[495]
are not financially sustainable
[497]
the amount of tax revenue collected by
[499]
the suburb does not cover the
[501]
replacement cost of its infrastructure
[504]
and so suburban cities become addicted
[506]
to growth any kind of growth
[508]
even second-rate taco joints just to
[510]
bring in enough tax revenue
[511]
to cover their maintenance obligations
[514]
but we've had several generations of
[516]
this suburban garbage
[518]
several life cycles of road water and
[520]
sewer replacements
[521]
but somehow suburbia is still there so
[524]
you might be asking yourself
[526]
how are car dependent suburbs still
[528]
around why is this still a thing
[530]
and what has kept it afloat all these
[532]
years well the answer is debt
[535]
lots and lots and lots of debt
[538]
but i'll explore that in the next
[539]
episode of this series on strong towns
[543]
i'd like to thank my supporters on
[544]
patreon who pay me to copy strong town's
[546]
homework
[547]
if you'd like to donate to strong towns
[548]
visit strongtowns.org
[550]
membership or if you'd like to support
[552]
this channel and get access to bonus
[554]
videos
[555]
visit patreon.com not just bikes
[578]
you