Minimization of Total Industry Costs of Production - YouTube

Channel: Marginal Revolution University

[0]
♪ [music] ♪
[8]
- [Alex] In this chapter, we return to the invisible hand.
[12]
We're going to show some remarkable properties
[14]
of competitive markets, properties that are a product
[17]
of human action but not of human design.
[21]
That is, these properties have neither been designed nor intended,
[24]
nor perhaps even understood by market participants.
[29]
And yet through the process of the invisible hand,
[32]
a spontaneous order evolves
[34]
in which these desirable properties are an outcome.
[38]
Let's take a look.
[43]
So for context, recall that in earlier chapters
[46]
we learned that markets connect
[48]
and coordinate actions all over the world.
[51]
Think about the rose and the coordination of actions
[54]
which was necessary to deliver the fresh rose
[57]
to your door on Valentine's Day.
[60]
We also learned that a price is a signal
[62]
wrapped up in an incentive.
[64]
That is, prices signal in what uses resources have the highest value
[68]
and they provide an incentive to move resources
[71]
to those high-valued uses.
[73]
We also learned that firms maximize profits
[76]
by doing two things.
[78]
First, by producing at the quantity
[80]
where price is equal to marginal cost.
[82]
And second, by entering an industry when there's profits,
[86]
when price is greater than average cost,
[88]
and by exiting an industry when there are losses,
[91]
when price is less than average cost.
[93]
What this chapter is all about is connecting these ideas,
[97]
bringing these ideas together.
[100]
We're going to show that competitive markets
[101]
have two remarkable invisible hand properties.
[104]
First, competitive markets balance production
[108]
across firms in an industry,
[111]
so that total industry costs are minimized
[115]
for any given quantity of production.
[118]
Second, entry and exit decisions balance production
[122]
across different industries
[124]
so that the total value of production is maximized.
[128]
And we'll explain each of these in turn.
[131]
To show how the invisible hand minimizes total industry cost,
[135]
we're going to start with what looks to be a quite different problem.
[138]
Suppose that you owned two farms
[141]
and you want to produce 200 bushels of corn
[143]
at the lowest possible cost.
[145]
How do you do it?
[147]
Well by looking at these two marginal cost curves,
[150]
you might reason that since the cost of producing any quantity of corn
[156]
is lower on Farm Two than on Farm One,
[160]
then maybe the best thing to do
[162]
is to produce all 200 units on Farm Two.
[166]
I'm going to show you that that's wrong.
[167]
Now, let's remember that we could read the cost
[171]
of producing the Nth unit of corn
[174]
as the height of the marginal cost curve for that unit.
[178]
So here's the cost of producing the 200th unit of corn.
[182]
Now imagine that you produced all 200 units from Farm Two.
[187]
Let's now show a lower cost way of producing 200 units.
[193]
For example, suppose you were to produce
[195]
25 fewer units on Farm Two.
[198]
Your cost will then fall by area A.
[204]
Now of course now you're producing 25 units less,
[207]
so in order to make up for that decrease in production,
[211]
you've got to produce 25 more units from Farm One.
[216]
Notice that in order to produce those 25 units on Farm One,
[219]
your costs go up by area B.
[223]
Now here's the key point --
[226]
area A is bigger than area B.
[230]
In other words by switching cost from the high marginal cost farm
[235]
to the low marginal cost farm, you have decreased your costs
[240]
by more than you have increased your costs.
[243]
In fact you've created a savings of area C, the difference.
[248]
Now if you follow through this logic,
[251]
it implies that whenever the marginal cost on one farm
[256]
is higher than the marginal cost on the other farm,
[260]
you can save money, you can save resources,
[264]
by transferring production from where the marginal cost is high
[268]
to where the marginal cost is low.
[272]
Now what does that mean if you want to minimize
[276]
the total cost of production?
[279]
The logic we just gave implies
[281]
that if you want to minimize the total cost of production,
[285]
you should balance your production across the two farms
[289]
so that the marginal costs on the two farms are equal.
[293]
In this case a 160 units from Farm Two
[296]
and 40 units from Farm One.
[299]
Again, just think about if that were not the case.
[302]
If the marginal cost of production on Farm Two were higher
[306]
than on Farm One, then you could always reduce your cost
[310]
by producing less on Farm Two and more on Farm One.
[315]
But of course the reverse is also true.
[317]
If the marginal cost on Farm One were higher than on Farm Two,
[322]
you would want to produce less on Farm One
[325]
and more on Farm Two.
[327]
So the way to minimize your total cost of production
[331]
is to produce such that the marginal costs of production
[337]
are equal on your two farms.
[341]
Now let's consider a much more difficult problem.
[345]
Suppose we have Pat's farm located on the West Coast
[347]
and Alex's farm thousands of miles away
[350]
on the East Coast.
[352]
And let us suppose that no one knows
[355]
the marginal cost on both of these farms.
[359]
Now the problem looks almost impossible.
[361]
How could we possibly allocate production
[364]
across these two farms to minimize total costs
[368]
when no one knows the marginal cost on both of these farms?
[372]
Clearly a central planner would not have enough information
[376]
to solve this problem.
[378]
And yet, the market does solve the problem.
[382]
Because even though nobody knows the marginal cost
[384]
on both of these farms,
[386]
Pat knows the marginal cost on Pat's farm.
[390]
Alex knows the marginal cost on Alex's farm.
[394]
And both of them know the price of corn.
[398]
Now consider, how does Pat profit maximize?
[401]
Pat profit maximizes by choosing to produce that quantity
[406]
such that price is equal to Pat's marginal cost.
[411]
Alex chooses to profit maximize by producing that quantity
[416]
such that price is equal to Alex's marginal cost.
[421]
And since the price of corn is the same for both of them,
[424]
they automatically choose to allocate production
[428]
across their two farms such that the marginal cost on Pat's farm
[433]
is equal to the marginal cost on Alex's farm.
[436]
And production is automatically allocated
[439]
so as to minimize total costs.
[443]
Now notice that neither Pat nor Alex intend
[446]
nor perhaps even understand this result.
[449]
It's only through the operation of the market,
[452]
through the operation of the invisible hand,
[455]
that production is automatically allocated across these two farms
[459]
to minimize total cost of production.
[463]
Look at what happens when the price changes.
[466]
As the price changes so does the allocation of production
[469]
across the two farms in just such a way
[472]
that total industry costs are minimized.
[475]
This is truly a remarkable result
[477]
and one that people might not even have suspected
[480]
prior to the development of economics
[483]
and the ability to see the invisible hand.
[487]
So let's summarize invisible hand property number one.
[490]
In a competitive market with N firms,
[492]
all firms face the same market price.
[496]
And to maximize profits, each firm adjusts its production,
[500]
adjusts its output,
[501]
until price is equal to that firm's marginal cost.
[506]
Therefore, the following is going to be true.
[509]
Price is equal to the marginal cost of Firm One
[511]
which is equal to the marginal cost of Firm Two
[514]
which is equal to the marginal cost of Firm N.
[516]
Since these marginal costs are all the same,
[520]
the total industry costs of production are minimized --
[525]
a remarkable result, and one due to the invisible hand.
[528]
Next we'll look at invisible hand property number two.
[532]
- [Narrator] If you want to test yourself,
[534]
click "Practice Questions."
[536]
Or, if you're ready to move on just click "Next Video."
[540]
♪ [music] ♪