Risk Vs. Return - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[1]
So what is risk?
[4]
Let's start by understanding what is risk, we hear that
[10]
the word risk used in many different context in, I think most common
[17]
understanding of risk or our intuitive understanding of risk is about relating
[24]
to danger of loss, or possibility of loss which certainly it's one useful
[29]
definition of risk but for looking at the relationship between risk and return
[34]
and successful... in scaleable entrepreneurship, I want to use more
[40]
of a financial definition of risk which is that the volatility of returns. So I
[46]
think once we have a more specific understanding of what is risk for our
[53]
purpose we'll be able to understand better what is the relationship between
[57]
risk and return.
[60]
So with that understanding of what is risk we can look at... start looking at
[67]
what is the relationship between risk and return? I think most people would
[72]
have heard the expression 'high risk high return, low risk low return' and this
[78]
would be... this would summarize their understanding of what's the relationship
[83]
between risk and return. These two phrases sound like they mean something
[88]
very similar so high risk high return, low risk low return but do they really
[94]
mean something very similar or do they mean something very different I think we
[100]
can understand that better if we try to convert these two statements or
[105]
transform these two statements into if-then statement if-then statement is a
[112]
statement in the form of if something then something else so if something is
[117]
true then something else always follows though let's look at those two
[120]
statements about risk and return transformed into if-then statements
[125]
let's take the second one first if I take low risk then I will achieve low
[132]
return is this true or false? At first it sounds like this might be false we
[139]
because we believe we might be able to think of an example of a low risk high
[147]
return investment because if the statement of if there if I take low risk
[153]
I will receive low return as false this means there must be a low risk
[159]
investment that delivers other than low return and let's rule out the case of no
[165]
return and therefore if we want to say that the statement if I take low risk I
[172]
will achieve low return is false we should be able to come up with at least
[176]
one example of a low risk investment that delivers a medium or high return
[183]
and I'm pretty sure that if we... no matter how much time we spend on that we're not
[188]
going to come up with an example because I believe that there are no lower
[193]
high return investments there only low risk low return investments and high
[198]
risk high return investments and of course medium rare medium return
[204]
um now some of the exception cases that when I asked this question to large
[212]
groups people some of the exception cases that usually come up are well what
[218]
about lottery tickets aren't lottery tickets low risk high return investments
[223]
because I invest only a very small amount of money but if I win I can win a
[229]
large amount of money this is confusing the amount that is wrists with the level
[235]
of risk just because lottery tickets are inexpensive doesn't mean they're low
[240]
risk in fact lottery tickets are extremely high risk that for the buyer
[245]
they're so high risk that in effect the buyer is guaranteed to lose money on
[250]
every lottery ticket the expected value of the lottery ticket is negative. We
[255]
know that this is true because we can look at the other side of the lottery
[259]
game and see that lottery tickets are sold by government who is basically
[265]
guaranteed winner on every lottery ticket meaning they are guaranteed that
[269]
every time they run the lottery they're gonna make money which means that on the
[273]
other side all the lottery ticket buyers are guaranteed losers. The same logic
[278]
holds true in another example of low risk high return investment that often
[285]
people think of when I ask this question; what about in casinos so if I play a
[292]
game in a casino I can just bet a little money and win a lot of money you can see
[297]
it's exactly the same dynamic as lottery tickets casino games are structured in
[304]
such a way that players will be net losers and the casino will be net
[308]
winners this is why casinos earn million a million or millions of dollars a day
[314]
in gamblers lose so much money in casinos. You might think but wait wait a
[320]
minute in my two examples is in government making a low risk high return
[325]
investment because they get to sell lottery tickets it's true governments
[329]
can create low risk high return investments for themselves because their
[334]
governments but low risk high return investments are not accessible to
[338]
ordinary investors in in ordinary investment markets and same thing with
[344]
casinos although they do experience... they do get to play the other side of the
[351]
casino game in which case the the odds are in their favor but they are also
[357]
subject as businesses to all the other risks of operating a casino or casinos
[362]
Resort in the hotel industry and subject to competition by other casino resorts
[367]
and also overall economic condition so we can see that none of the examples
[374]
that we come up with are going to give us low risk high return investments with
[379]
one exception one of my one of my examples of possible low risk high
[385]
return investment is in high-frequency trading
[387]
we're certain arbitrage strategies can generate what appear to be risk-free
[393]
investment, a risk-free returns or a very low risk return but a very low risk high
[398]
return for hedge funds or others that are using those strategies however when
[405]
we look closely at that example so high risk this high frequency trading returns
[411]
we can see that they persist, the opportunities that generate these
[416]
returns only persist for extremely short periods of time this illustrates the
[423]
reality of low risk high return investments if they ever do appear they
[428]
disappear almost immediately. How can we understand that concept a little better?
[435]
I would ask how many people have ever found $100 bill in the street? The answer
[442]
is very few people have ever found hundred dollar bill in the street I
[447]
asked this question to thousands of people and there's only a tiny handful
[450]
that I've ever found $100 bills how many people find small coins in the street
[455]
everybody finds small coins in the street. Why? What's the difference between
[459]
finding small coins in the street and finding hundred-dollar bills in the
[463]
street? When we find small coins in the street this is a low risk low return
[468]
opportunity if we ever find hundred-dollar bills in the street,
[472]
it's a low risk high return opportunity which is why it doesn't happen and why
[478]
doesn't it happen? Because when hundred dollar bills appear in the street very
[483]
infrequently, somebody else always finds them first not you, that's how these... that
[489]
illustrates how these low risk high return opportunities if they do appear
[493]
are erased almost immediately by market forces
[499]
Imagine that there's a company that we can measure the risk level, we can't
[504]
really do it like this but imagine we could measure the risk level of that
[508]
company as risk level five all other companies in this market of risk level
[514]
five are paying return five which is exactly commensurate with the risk.
[518]
Now, imagine that our company starts paying return level six why are they
[524]
doing that? Now they're paying a higher return than they need to given the risk
[530]
in that investment. They're doing this because they have a short-term need for
[534]
cash when they get enough cash to satisfy that short-term need they will
[538]
reduce their return this shows that the the high degree of positive correlation
[546]
between risk and return is driven by the supply and demand for capital, so when
[553]
there's a mismatch between supply and demand for capital the market
[558]
will correct this relatively... in most cases very quickly so that the return on
[564]
any investment will always reach an equilibrium level with the risk that the
[569]
market perceives in that investment. So what have... what conclusions can we draw
[575]
from this? If we want to generate high returns we have to take more risk, if we
[584]
are not willing to take more risk we must be satisfied with the level of
[588]
return commensurate with that risk this has extremely important
[593]
implications for scalable entrepreneurs, why? Investors who invest in scalable
[600]
companies, meaning venture investors, are looking for high risk investments, why
[607]
are they looking for high risk investments? Because they're investing in
[611]
these startup companies to increase their returns
[615]
therefore scalable entrepreneurs should be prepared to take a much higher level
[623]
of risk than typical... than the average person in the population and even
[628]
typical entrepreneurs. So example to make it even more clear, if I'm a
[635]
venture capital investor and I'm listening to a pitch by a startup who
[639]
tells me I have, you know, a great business idea it's not risky at all, it's a sure
[646]
thing, this is now... if I believe this entrepreneur this is now not an
[651]
interesting investment, why? If it's a sure thing and there's no risk at all
[655]
then the return in this investment will not be high enough to exceed the hurdle
[662]
rate in my investment making decision and therefore not interested.