🔍
When to Claim Social Security with Mary Beth Franklin - YouTube
Channel: Retire with Purpose
[0]
Mary Beth, you are married and you're of Social
Security age.
[4]
I think everybody would love to hear the Social
Security expert’s strategy on their Social
[9]
Security benefit.
[10]
Mary Beth Franklin: Well, it probably depends
if you asked me before or after Congress changed
[15]
the rules.
[17]
Back in 2015, when Congress was passing some
critical financial legislation to raise the
[25]
debt ceiling, they had to do it or the government
couldn't pay the bills that had already incurred.
[31]
Without any public hearing or discussion,
they attached amendments to that bill, that
[36]
changed the way we can claim our Social Security
benefits, these two creative claiming strategies.
[43]
One was known as file and suspend.
[46]
It meant that if I waited until my full retirement
age, to file for my Social Security benefits,
[53]
I could file for them, which would trigger
benefits for my eligible family members, generally
[59]
a spouse, and then I could immediately suspend
them so I wouldn't actually get a check but
[65]
my benefits would keep growing.
[67]
That was one creative claiming strategy.
[70]
Congress shut it down on six months’ notice.
[72]
They passed this law in November 2015 and
said, "Six months from now, April 2016, anybody
[78]
who's 66 or older can use this strategy.
[82]
After that, nobody else can.”
[84]
But people who used it were grandfathered
under the old rules.
[88]
Then they gave us a four-year phase-in for
another valuable claiming strategy and that's
[94]
what's so important this year.
[96]
It says that people who are married or eligible
divorced spouses, when they reach their full
[102]
retirement age of 66, could say to Social
Security, "Don't pay me my benefit on my work
[110]
record.
[111]
Pay me only as a spouse.
[113]
That means give me half of my husband's full
retirement age benefit or give me half of
[119]
my wife's full retirement age benefit while
my own benefit continues to grow by 8% a year,
[125]
and at 70, I will switch to my own maximum
retirement benefit.”
[131]
For married couples, this strategy can boost
their lifetime benefits in terms of what they
[137]
both get while they're alive, and what the
remaining spouse gets in terms of a survivor
[142]
benefit by $50,000, $60,000, $70,000 a year
or more.
[146]
Lifetime benefits, not pre-term.
[147]
Casey Weade: Sure.
[148]
Mary Beth Franklin: You know, very, very valuable
strategy.
[152]
But the key is now only people who turned
66 by this year, technically by January 1,
[159]
2020, means they can use this strategy.
[163]
People born January 2, 1954 or later, which
includes me, cannot do this.
[170]
Now, I always joke that my face is on a dartboard
at the Social Security Administration and
[174]
they do know what my birthday is so I don't
think this is a real accident.
[178]
And I do apologize to anyone born in 1954
or later.
[183]
It's obviously my fault and I'm really sorry.
[185]
So, I can't use this double fancy strategy
that my husband and I had planned to use initially.
[191]
So, our plan B is my husband is now 67 years
old.
[196]
He has not yet claimed Social Security.
[198]
I turned 65 December this year.
[202]
I will wait until I turn 66.
[205]
In December 2020, I will claim my full retirement
age benefit, at which point that triggers
[212]
a spousal benefit for my husband.
[214]
He will be 68 at the time.
[216]
He will use this strategy known as filing
a restricted claim for spousal benefits.
[222]
That means I'm not claiming all my benefits.
[225]
I am restricting my claim to just spousal
benefits.
[229]
He will get half of my full retirement age
benefit for two years and then at 70, he will
[234]
claim his own maximum benefit, which will
be 32% higher than it would have been when
[239]
he was 66.
[241]
And then depending on which one of us is the
survivor, the bigger Social Security benefit
[246]
will continue and the smaller one will go
away.
[249]
Casey Weade: Well, you're using a similar
strategy as we're doing with my mom.
[252]
She's using her spousal benefit, delaying
her own benefit until it's maxed out at age
[256]
70 and for some of these rules will still
persist after this year for people like divorcees
[262]
for instance, correct?
[263]
Mary Beth Franklin: Well, people whether they're
married or divorced, the key is you must be
[268]
born on or before January 1, 1954.
[274]
If you're born after that date, you will never
be able to use this fancy strategy.
[279]
It goes away.
[280]
Casey Weade: So, are there any fancy strategies
left?
[283]
Widows?
[284]
What options do we have?
[286]
Mary Beth Franklin: Yes.
[287]
Widows and widowers, regardless of their birth
date, will still have the ability to collect
[293]
a retirement benefit first and switch to a
survivor benefit later, or vice versa, whichever
[300]
would benefit them more.
[302]
You have to understand that retirement benefits
on your own work record and survivor benefits
[308]
on your late spouse or your late ex-spouse’s
work record are two different pots of money.
[315]
And you are entitled to choose when to claim
them.
[317]
So, I'm going to give you an example from
my own family.
[320]
My brother Bobby died 10 years ago this month,
much too young and when his widow, Lillian,
[327]
turned 62 a few years ago, she asked me which
Social Security benefit could she collect?
[332]
Should she collect her own retirement benefit
or should she collect a survivor benefit?
[338]
And I said, “Well, you know, I know you're
still working.
[342]
Are you making much money?”
[343]
“No, no, not really.
[344]
Since Bobby died, I just haven't felt like
it”.
[347]
“Okay, whose benefit is bigger, your own
retirement benefit or Bobby’s survivor benefit?”
[352]
“Oh, his is much better than mine.”
[354]
“All right, I want you to claim at 62 your
own reduced retirement benefit.
[360]
You would get 75% of your full retirement
age amount and if you make more than the earnings
[366]
restrictions, which in 2019, believe it or
not, is $17,640 a year, you make more than
[374]
that, you start losing some benefits.”
[375]
I said, "Collect your own retirement benefit
at 62.
[379]
Even if you lose some money to the earnings
restrictions, don't worry about it because
[384]
when you reach your full retirement age of
66, you are going to switch to your survivor
[389]
benefits.
[390]
And even though your retirement benefits were
permanently reduced, it has no impact on your
[396]
survivor benefits.”
[398]
And that's what she did.
[400]
But in those interim 10 years, she became
a very successful real estate agent making
[405]
more than $100,000 a year.
[407]
Had she asked me that same question when she
was making so much money, I would have said,
[412]
"Don't claim any benefits before your full
retirement age.
[415]
You're making too much money.
[417]
You would lose them all, at least temporarily,
to the earnings restrictions.
[421]
Don't do it.
[422]
But when you reach your full retirement age
of 66, I still want you to collect your survivor
[428]
benefits because survivor benefits are worth
the maximum amount at your full retirement
[434]
age.
[435]
They do not earn delayed retirement credits
of 8% a year but your retirement benefit does.
[441]
I want you to collect only your survivor benefits
at 66.
[446]
Let your own retirement benefits keep growing
and if at age 70, your retirement benefits
[451]
are bigger, you're going to switch.”
[453]
Now, the reason this is so important is the
Social Security Administration did an internal
[459]
random sample about a year-and-a-half ago,
where they looked at the advice that Social
[464]
Security claims reps were giving people who
are entitled to both the retirement benefit
[469]
and a survivor benefit and that random sample
found out that in 82% of the cases, the claims
[477]
rep did not give the best advice.
[479]
So, it's really important for you to know
what you're entitled to.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





