Beating the Market with Fama and French 3 Factor Model? Small-Cap and Value Factor ETFs Combined! - YouTube

Channel: fu academy

[0]
How nice would it be to have a portfolio  that can consistently beat the market. 
[4]
Well, there is actually a Nobel  prize winning strategy out there:  
[7]
The Fama and French 3 Factor Model. 
[10]
Ever heard of it? Me neither! 
[11]
That's why we will break it down in this video. We will go through the model quickly and  
[15]
look at how you can build that  portfolio yourself - let’s go! 
[26]
What’s up everyone? This is fu  
[28]
academy - your channel for financial education. And on this channel, I share lifestyle, investing  
[33]
style and educational videos - just like this one. So if you are new here, consider subscribing. 
[38]
The Fama French Model was invented by Nobel prize  winner Eugene Fama and Kenneth French in 1992. 
[44]
Their model is based on the capital asset pricing  model and whoever has done a company valuation  
[50]
before might have seen this. Don’t worry if not. 
[53]
The capital asset pricing model measures the  expected market return of the stock market  
[58]
in excess of risk-free investments  like the return you would get on a US  
[62]
10-year treasury rate which currently is 1.74%. So it’s essentially the risk premium that you  
[69]
get for investing your money in riskier  investments than just treasury bonds. 
[73]
And without getting too technical here, Fama and  French’s model builds upon this first factor,  
[79]
the expected market return, by  adding the 2 additional factors:  
[83]
Value and Small-Cap. But why? 
[85]
They tested thousands of random stock portfolios  and found out 2 things in their research. 
[90]
Number 1: Value stocks tend  to outperform growth stocks. 
[94]
And number 2: Small-Cap stocks tend  to outperform Large-Cap stocks. 
[98]
Fama and French came to the conclusion that  when you combine Value and Small-Cap with the  
[103]
expected market return, then this explains 95%  of the return in a diversified stock portfolio. 
[109]
So in total, Fama and  French's model has 3 factors. 
[113]
If you are looking to build a  portfolio with these 3 factors,  
[116]
you could use the Core-Satellite strategy. The core is the centre of that portfolio that  
[121]
passively tracks the market - and that’s  where the majority of your money goes. 
[124]
The satellites are used for bets on  specific industries or investment styles  
[129]
that have the potential to produce  a higher return than the market. 
[133]
If we go back to Fama and French's 3  factor model, then the first factor  
[137]
is the expected market return. This can be the core of your portfolio  
[140]
in which you invest the majority of your money. For this, you could use a low-cost plain ETF  
[146]
that just tracks the market like Vanguard's  Total Stock Market ETF which tracks the US  
[151]
stock market or Vanguard's Total World Stock  ETF which tracks the global stock market. 
[156]
If you want to find out which of  these 2 core ETFs is best for you,  
[160]
then check out the video in the link. What we will focus on in this video  
[164]
are the 2 satellite investments: One for the  Small-Cap factor and one for the Value factor. 
[170]
By the way, if you want to learn more about the  Core-Satellite strategy and how to set it up  
[175]
yourself, then check out the video in the link. So let’s have a look at investment options  
[179]
for Fama and French's second factor: Size. For this one, you could use the iShares Core  
[184]
S&P Small-Cap ETF, ticker symbol IJR. It’s one of the oldest, biggest,  
[189]
simplest and cheapest ETFs out there. This ETF tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. 
[194]
This index only includes US companies  with a market cap between $750m to $3.3bn,  
[200]
that have a public float of at least 10% and  its most recent quarter’s earnings and the sum  
[206]
of its trailing four consecutive  quarters’ earnings must be positive. 
[209]
The IJR has an expense ratio of 0.06% - making  it one of the cheapest Small-Cap ETFs out there. 
[215]
Its performance in the last 10 years was  strong with an annual return of over 14%,  
[220]
only 2% less per year than the S&P 500. This ETF has a fund size of $69bn which  
[227]
makes it the largest Small-Cap ETF out there. This ETF invests in over 600 companies. 
[232]
If we have a look at the top holdings, you  will see companies like Omnicell, for example. 
[237]
But compared to an S&P 500 ETF, the top  holdings are definitely less well-known. 
[242]
But that’s also what you  expect from a Small-Cap ETF. 
[244]
The top 10 holdings make up less than 5% of  the fund - which is incredibly well-balanced. 
[249]
If we have a look at the sector breakdown,  you will see that this ETF mainly invests in  
[254]
Financials with an exposure of 19%. Tech only comes in at number  
[258]
3 with an exposure of 13%. This ETF only invests in US stocks. 
[262]
And dividends are paid out quarterly  with a dividend yield of 1.65%. 
[267]
Now the IJR is a good starting point  when you look at Small-Cap ETFs. 
[271]
But it’s not the only interesting option. There is also the iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF,  
[277]
ticker symbol SCZ. And the special  
[279]
feature of this ETF is its global focus. This ETF invests in over 2,300 companies  
[286]
from 21 countries - so mega diversified. And for the investors that want to go green,  
[290]
there is the iShares ESG Aware MSCI  USA Small-Cap ETF, ticker symbol ESML. 
[296]
If you want to know more about ESG investing,  then check out my dedicated ESG video in the link. 
[302]
For investors outside the US, I put  together UCITS alternatives which  
[307]
you can find in the video description below. By the way: If you want to see my dedicated  
[312]
video in which I review the best Small-Cap  ETFs, then check out the video in the link. 
[317]
Now let’s check out Fama and  French's third factor: Value. 
[321]
And that brings us to Vanguard’s  Value ETF, ticker symbol VTV. 
[325]
It’s one of the largest and  cheapest Value ETF out there. 
[328]
This ETF tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index  which selects companies based on Value metrics  
[333]
like Price-to-Book, forward P/E, historic  P/E, Price-to-Dividend and Price-to-Sales. 
[338]
The VTV has a dirt-cheap expense ratio of 0.04%. Its performance over the last 10 years was solid  
[345]
with an annual return of 13.2%, which  was 3% lower than the S&P 500 return  
[351]
over the same time frame - per year. And if you look at the performance chart,  
[355]
you can also see where that difference comes from. Until the 2020 crash, the VTV and the S&P 500  
[360]
index had an almost identical performance. But since the 2020 crash,  
[364]
the VTV recovered slower. And that’s because the S&P  
[367]
500 index is dominated by Big Tech - and it’s  tech companies that benefited the most from a  
[373]
shift towards ecommerce and cloud technology. This ETF has a fund size of $94bn which makes it  
[380]
not just the largest Value ETF out  there but also puts it in the top  
[384]
10 of the largest ETFs - period. The VTV invests in 351 companies  
[388]
which gives you a nice diversification. In the top 10 holdings, you will find  
[392]
well-known companies like Berkshire of course,  and banks like JP Morgan and Bank of America. 
[397]
The top 10 holdings make up 20% of the fund -  which is a relatively high concentration risk. 
[402]
Important to note: The VTV  only invests in US companies. 
[405]
If we have a look at the industry  breakdown of this ETF, you can see  
[408]
that the industries with the highest exposure  are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. 
[414]
These 3 industries alone make up 54%, whilst  the exposure to Tech companies is only 7%. 
[420]
And that’s the opposite of the S&P 500 industry  breakdown but quite common for Value ETFs. 
[426]
If you think about it, it makes perfect sense:  Tech companies are usually high-growth companies  
[431]
with a lot of future potential. And for all that, investors are  
[434]
willing to pay a higher price today,  which pushes up their valuations. 
[438]
Banks, on the other side,  don’t grow massively anymore. 
[441]
They are more stable and established companies  that meet a lot of criteria for Value investors. 
[446]
And they tend to be cheaper because they don’t  create as much excitement amongst investors. 
[451]
And lastly, the VTV pays out dividends  every quarter with a dividend yield is 2.2%. 
[457]
This ETF is a great place to  start looking for a Value ETF. 
[461]
It gives you easy and diversified exposure  to Value stocks at a very fair price. 
[466]
But it’s not the only interesting option. There is also the iShares MSCI International  
[470]
Value Factor ETF, ticker symbol IVLU. This one is a global Value option. 
[475]
This ETF invests in 19 developed countries. And for investors that want to go green,  
[480]
there is the Nuveen ESG Large-Cap  Value ETF, ticker symbol NULV. 
[485]
I also put together UCITS alternatives for  investors outside the US which you can find  
[490]
in the video description below. By the way: If you want to see my  
[494]
dedicated video in which I review the best Value  ETFs, then check out the video in the link. 
[499]
But to be fully transparent: I personally  don’t own Value ETFs as my satellites. 
[504]
And that has a reason. Most Value ETFs filter  
[507]
out companies with a high Price-to-Book ratio. And a company these days can activate pretty much  
[512]
everything: Software, furniture and so on. Activating assets will increase your book value. 
[518]
But the network effect of platforms  like Meta is something that you  
[522]
won’t find on the balance sheet. That happens outside the balance sheet. 
[526]
But that’s also where the value  of these companies really sits. 
[529]
That’s something Value ETFs can’t capture. There you have it: The Fama and French 3 Factor  
[534]
Model explained and how to set it up yourself. One big downside of this model is  
[538]
that it was built in 1992. And back then, yes Value and  
[543]
Small-Cap outperformed the total stock market. But since then, the opposite has happened. 
[548]
Growth and Large-Cap kept outperforming. And today, the S&P 500 is dominated by Big Tech,  
[554]
so growth stocks. So much so that the  
[556]
5 largest companies of the S&P 500 are all tech  companies and they hold the highest share the top  
[562]
5 companies have ever held - almost 20%. So this model isn’t perfect. 
[567]
But it’s a good way to think  about portfolio construction. 
[570]
But hey - what do you actually think  about the Fama and French model? 
[574]
Is it still applicable in today’s  environment or is it outdated? 
[577]
Are you investing in Value  or Small-Cap ETFs already? 
[580]
As always - let me know in  the comment section below. 
[584]
I hope that this video could  bring some value to you. 
[586]
If you liked what you saw and you want to support  this channel, then please make sure you subscribe. 
[590]
Thank you very much for doing that - and peace!