Personal data: What does GDPR mean for your research data? - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[8]
researchers are very conscientious and
[12]
in terms of the general data protection
[14]
regulation there's a lot that
[17]
researchers are already doing right so
[19]
there should be no need to panic
[23]
researchers are used to being
[26]
trustworthy processors of data on behalf
[28]
of their human subjects and they care
[30]
and they go about informing people about
[33]
their research and getting the proper
[35]
consent so none of that needs to change
[38]
but there are there may be some legal
[41]
issues that haven't been thought of
[43]
before so for example if you're
[45]
transcribing an interview and you're
[49]
hiring someone to do that you want to
[51]
make a legal agreement because they're a
[53]
data processor of that data and that's a
[57]
risk that you need to make sure that
[59]
you've accounted for another aspect is
[64]
if you're sharing data that involves
[66]
human subjects you may want to create a
[67]
data use agreement with the person
[69]
you're sharing it with it's certainly a
[72]
good idea to use the guidance of the
[74]
university's data protection officer
[76]
which is online or contact them or talk
[80]
to us in case it's something that that
[83]
we can help you with in the first
[84]
instance the research data support team
[86]
yes I think the question of sensitive
[89]
data you know troubles lots of
[90]
researchers and I think I mean partly
[93]
because there's some confusion over
[94]
there the term in a way because it has
[96]
official meanings in the Data Protection
[99]
Act and the GDP or now and then for say
[104]
social scientists or some kind of
[106]
humanities researchers what might count
[109]
as sensitive or not sensitive kind of
[110]
varies but I think we really also have
[113]
to think about what is it that sensitive
[115]
for our participants which may not be
[116]
the same as what's sensitive for us as
[119]
researchers so I think that's the first
[120]
thing that we need to kind of
[122]
disentangle really is who is a sensitive
[125]
for or to and really take our
[130]
participants kind of lead on that in
[133]
terms of what they think needs you know
[139]
needs to be considered especially
[140]
sensitive or not but the the other thing
[145]
I guess is because
[147]
you know the kind of recent history of
[149]
the social sciences has been to to the
[154]
way of taking care of data has been to
[156]
kind of lock it up or destroy it after
[159]
interviews and that's been seen as the
[161]
way to kind of manage sensitive data is
[163]
that you kind of destroy it afterwards
[165]
but there's that's really changing now
[167]
and so now there's the kind of
[169]
possibilities of sharing data and
[171]
archiving it and making it public in
[174]
various ways so I think so I think we
[179]
need to think about all data really
[181]
carefully all data needs really careful
[183]
attention but not all data needs to be
[186]
locked away so yeah I think it's really
[188]
important now at consent forms that we
[191]
include the possibilities of lots of
[194]
different ways that data might be used
[196]
in the future so that our consent forms
[198]
don't just include I was a researcher
[201]
I'm going to use the data in this way
[203]
for this particular project but that we
[205]
include the possibility that the data
[208]
might be used in the future which might
[211]
be then it's a very near future or it
[212]
might be the far future by other
[214]
researchers or indeed by by non
[218]
academics maybe if we make the data
[221]
available in that way and I suppose you
[227]
know something like the GDP or will or
[230]
maybe have this effect because it's it's
[232]
I guess driving us to think more about a
[235]
more granular approach to consent and
[238]
kind of breaking consents down
[240]
explicitly in different ways that data
[242]
might be used so I think the question of
[245]
what to share through a facility like
[248]
data showers are you know it's a really
[251]
important question for researchers to
[252]
think through now and and I think you
[255]
know not so long ago this question
[257]
wouldn't have been on researchers
[259]
agendas I think in the way that it is
[262]
increasingly now and so I think once the
[267]
question would have been oh can we can
[268]
we share anything is there anything that
[270]
can go into the public domain but I
[272]
think that question is really shifting
[273]
to thinking about actually why not share
[277]
this through data share
[279]
so rather than thinking what is it
[280]
possible to share actually now I think
[283]
the question is a little bit more like
[284]
well what's the rationale for not
[286]
sharing data so so I think we need to
[292]
think again really carefully with all of
[296]
our data yeah needs this kind of careful
[299]
attention and careful thinking through
[302]
and I also think then that participants
[304]
need to be kind of part of that process
[307]
so that when we're having interviews or
[309]
encounters with people that were putting
[312]
that idea into people's mind so that
[314]
they can think through for themselves
[316]
what the implications might be for them
[319]
also so that the decision is not one
[322]
that the researcher is making a loan but
[324]
the researcher might be making in kind
[326]
of conversation with research
[328]
participants when that's appropriate
[333]
so the research data service has a
[336]
couple of new initiatives that will help
[338]
people who are dealing with personal
[341]
data the researchers so in the active
[345]
phase when they're working on the data
[346]
and analyzing it if it's if the data is
[349]
too sensitive to use on the normal data
[352]
store service which is what we have for
[354]
everyday research and it gets backed up
[356]
and it's centrally located they can
[358]
apply to use the data safe haven and in
[362]
that way the data stays on a secure
[365]
server and the only people who can
[368]
access it are the approved researchers
[371]
who go in through a remote desktop and
[373]
so it stays safe there's no copies
[376]
proliferating and being left on drains
[378]
and things like that we also have on the
[380]
archiving side the data vault also a new
[385]
part of the service in which sensitive
[388]
data will be encrypted and put on tape
[390]
for a long-term retention as long as the
[393]
data needs to be kept and it will be
[394]
securely destroyed at the end if that's
[396]
what's needed or preserved further