Inequality of the Economy: Interviewing Secretary Yellen | The Problem With Jon Stewart | Apple TV+ - YouTube

Channel: The Problem With Jon Stewart

[0]
I think the 2008 crisis is a great example.
[4]
Instead of a big firehose of money
[7]
being turned on those mortgages that
[9]
went underwater and brought them back to sea level,
[14]
they chose to pour money into those bundles
[18]
and a lot of people lost their houses.
[20]
People had every reason to feel unhappy about what happened.
[26]
The purpose of intervening so that big financial institutions
[31]
and markets didn't completely fail
[34]
was to avoid a drying up of credit in the economy.
[38]
If those financial institutions had been allowed to fail,
[44]
the toll on ordinary families would
[48]
have been not only bad, which it was, but unspeakably
[53]
horrendous.
[54]
We would have been looking at something like the Great
[57]
Depression.
[58]
I think for people, they would view it as, well,
[63]
if I'm going to lose my house, that's a crisis.
[67]
And I don't have a backstop.
[70]
That's an important reason why when the pandemic struck,
[74]
President Biden and his administration
[79]
have been focused on using fiscal policy, not the Fed,
[84]
to get help to all those who really need it.
[89]
But corporate America gets all the benefits
[92]
of American stability and fiscal policy,
[95]
but bears none of the responsibility.
[97]
I'll give you an example--
[99]
Walmart, they make billions in profits.
[102]
Their workers are one of the largest corporate users
[107]
of social service programs.
[109]
Why don't Walmart workers share in the profits of Walmart?
[113]
In a capitalist system, companies
[117]
have a right to distribute profits to their shareholders.
[122]
They're not forced to, there's nothing in the law that force--
[126]
Aren't we subsidizing it?
[128]
This is the insidious part, I think,
[129]
of when we talk about that we have a free market
[132]
system, because what it makes it seem
[134]
like is that the natural order of things
[138]
is that Walmart makes billions in profits
[141]
and can distribute it to its shareholders,
[143]
and that's just how it goes.
[145]
But we know that we the taxpayers
[148]
are subsidizing their workforce with food stamps.
[152]
They're getting the benefit of our tax dollars,
[156]
so it's not free market.
[158]
The government, in many cases, should be running programs.
[163]
It's not necessarily the case that Walmart
[167]
should do that directly.
[168]
You don't feel they are responsible because they
[171]
benefit from fiscal policy.
[173]
They benefit from the American infrastructure.
[175]
They do benefit from fiscal policy,
[178]
but I think an important way of making them pay
[182]
is by taxing them and making sure
[185]
that their profits provide the resources to provide
[190]
that infrastructure.
[191]
You would rather they still make their billions in profit,
[196]
but as long as they pay us taxes so that we have enough
[199]
to give their workers food stamps, that's OK.
[203]
We also need to invest in their workers
[205]
so that they can have jobs that will produce
[211]
better pay that they'll have the skills to be able to compete.
[214]
But it feels like the system doesn't
[217]
have accountability for those at the corporate level.
[221]
How do we build that into the system?
[223]
I think there's a lot of truth in what you're saying,
[225]
and we are very focused on trying
[228]
to make sure that companies are responsible and do
[233]
pay their fair share.
[237]
But we slashed the IRS budget-- we make
[240]
accountability very difficult.
[242]
We're trying to reverse that.
[244]
We're proposing a substantial increase
[248]
in resources for the IRS so they can go after tax evasion.
[253]
I want to tell you about another thing that's important here.
[256]
All over the world, countries have
[258]
been competing with one another to attract these companies
[263]
by cutting corporate tax rates.
[265]
Every country faces this--
[267]
of companies having power and saying to governments,
[271]
cut our tax rates or we're going to go someplace else.
[274]
Is the problem here that corporations
[275]
feel like they have this country over a barrel?
[278]
We have a system where political contributions are important
[282]
and where wealthy corporations and individuals use
[288]
the power of--
[290]
Access.
[292]
Access to skew the playing field.
[295]
But the Biden administration has a different view,
[300]
and we want to make sure that companies behave fairly,
[306]
that they pay their fair share, and we make the investments
[310]
in people and in communities--
[312]
Who fights you on this?
[313]
Necessary to reverse this.
[314]
When you guys bring this up or when you try and change
[317]
fiscal policy in that way, where is the fight from?
[321]
What are the headwinds?
[322]
Why is it difficult to push through?
[325]
Well, the headwinds--
[326]
And I'd like some names.
[328]
Let me get a pen.
[331]
People don't like to have their taxes increased.
[333]
And we need to raise more tax revenue in order
[339]
to finance the investments that our economy needs
[343]
to be productive and for families to do well.