Mistake #3 Growing fixed assets slower than revenue | 9 Valuation mistakes - YouTube

Channel: Andrew Stotz

[0]
This is Andrew Stotz of A. Stotz Investment Research to talking to you about the top nine
[4]
valuation mistakes and how to avoid them.
[8]
This is Mistake #3: Growing fixed assets slower than revenue
[12]
Before we get into it, let's review the top nine:
[14]
#1 Overly optimistic revenue forecasts
[17]
#2 Underestimating expenses causing an unrealistic profit number
[23]
#3 Growing fixed assets slower than revenue
[26]
#4 Confusing growth Capex with maintenance Capex
[29]
#5 Forecasting drastic changes in the cash conversion cycle
[33]
#6 Underestimating working capital investment.
[37]
#7 Valuing a stock using the calculated Beta
[41]
#8 Choosing an unreasonable cost of equity
[44]
#9 Not properly fading the return on invested capital
[47]
Let's talk about #3: Growing fixed assets slower than revenue.
[52]
Sit down around the campfire and I'm going to tell you a campfire story.
[56]
This is a true story though I've changed the facts to make it a little bit easier to understand.
[61]
But this is a story about what an analyst came to me with when they were getting ready
[65]
to publish a report and I was the head of research.
[68]
So let's take a look.
[69]
The analyst first presented me with their cash flow data.
[72]
And what I could see is what I call “basic cash flow.”
[75]
It's just net operating profit plus depreciation and amortization.
[79]
What we can see is a slightly double-digit growth and slightly high in 2021 at 16.
[88]
We could discuss that; maybe it needs to come down.
[91]
Of course, you need to think about assumptions in the final years because if they're really
[95]
high, then we're going to carry on those high profitability or free cash flow valuations
[104]
to infinity, and that could cause us to inflate the terminal value.
[109]
Let's look at the next thing.
[110]
This is the next part that he presented.
[112]
What he showed me was the Capex: the Capex in the first forecasted year, 2017, was 29;
[119]
in the second forecasted year of 2018, it was 32; in the third forecasted year of 2019,
[126]
it was 35.
[127]
When we got to the fourth and the fifth years, what he showed me was that it went to five.
[134]
Wow!
[135]
So the investment amount of the overall company dropped dramatically in those periods 4 and 5.
[142]
And what does this cause?
[143]
In the first year, in particular, it caused a massive jump in the free cash flow to the
[147]
firm.
[148]
The free cash flow to the firm went from 54 to 95, a 77% jump.
[154]
What's the problem with that?
[155]
The problem is that you're overstating the free cash flow to the firm; and when you're
[160]
overstating in one year ─ let's say, a discrete year ─ it's not a big deal.
[164]
But when you're overstating towards the end of the discrete period that you're forecasting,
[169]
what ends up happening is that you're carrying on that very high number to infinity ─ to
[175]
the terminal value ─ and, therefore, you may find a situation where you're overvaluing
[180]
the stock based upon this assumption.
[182]
Now, another way of looking at it is to look at the basic cash flow versus free cash flow
[187]
to the firm.
[188]
We could see that it was 2020 that that cut came in the Capex.
[193]
Here's the further information on the story.
[197]
I asked the analyst, “Wait a minute, if we go back to this number, why did you choose
[202]
five in 2020?”
[205]
He said, “I didn't choose five.”
[208]
“Why did you get five?”
[210]
He said, “Actually, the company gave me the numbers for 2017.
[216]
They gave Capex guidance: 29 in 2017, 32 in 2018, and 35 in 2019.
[225]
I just plugged in 5 because I didn't want to show you zero for 2020 in 2021.
[232]
But the company gave no guidance.”
[236]
So what do you do in a situation where a company gives no guidance on something like that?
[241]
I discussed with the analyst that, basically, the job of an analyst is to think about the
[245]
perpetuity or that this company is going to exist for many years going forward; and the
[252]
CEOs and the management of the company are going to find new investments to spend on.
[256]
And, therefore, though you don't have specific guidance from the company, you need to make
[261]
a Capex assumption in those later periods.
[265]
If you don't do that, you're going to have the problem that I highlight which is overinflating
[270]
the free cash flow to the firm.
[272]
So what you're seeing is a case of an analyst not growing the Capex or the fixed assets
[278]
as fast as they're growing the revenue.
[281]
Let's take a look at that now.
[286]
Let's look at a company here that I've taken and made it simple: sales, assets, and the
[291]
sales-to-asset ratio.
[292]
This company is growing assets from 100 to 115 ─ a small growth in assets of 15%.
[298]
But what we can also see is that the sales are going from 140 to 168.
[308]
So what does that do to the sales-to-asset ratio?
[310]
It increases from 140 to 146.
[314]
That's pretty good.
[315]
That means the company is generating 146 in revenue for every 100 in assets it has in
[321]
place.
[322]
But if we go forward and we look at this number, what we're going to see is that if we take
[326]
the data from the prior company, we're going to see that the amount of sales relative to
[332]
assets is going to be rising and rising.
[335]
So we take a company that had sales-to-assets of a 140 and by the time 2021 is seen, it's
[342]
at 248 in sales for every 100 in assets.
[348]
We can look at that sales-to-asset ratio here in a simple chart.
[352]
And what does this tell us?
[355]
This tells us that the analyst has probably been overly optimistic on sales growth but
[361]
it's probably more likely that the analyst has not forecasted enough fixed asset growth.
[368]
So let's look at this Error #3: Forecasting fixed asset growth lower than sales.
[374]
Analysts often underestimate fixed asset growth.
[377]
It actually happens in almost every analyst that I've worked with in the Valuation Master
[381]
Class in the beginning.
[383]
They put in a little bit of fixed asset growth.
[386]
And it takes investment to grow revenue.
[389]
You can't grow the revenue of a company without this fixed asset growth.
[393]
And that's why it's got to be in there.
[395]
It's also unrealistic to forecast a company to grow revenue without growing its assets.
[401]
So we always want to be thinking about the assets that the company has and how they're
[404]
growing it.
[405]
How do we avoid this common mistake?
[407]
A rule of thumb is that fixed asset growth should roughly match revenue.
[411]
We know that investment and fixed asset is generally lumpy in that we build a new factory
[416]
or something like that.
[418]
And when we do, it may not get the revenue yet but, eventually, it comes back.
[422]
Taking into consideration that the fixed asset growth is lumpy, we want to think that it's
[428]
going to grow generally the same as revenue.
[432]
Use the asset turnover ratio to prevent this error.
[435]
It can help you to see when you're getting unrealistic as we saw in that one chart.
[440]
Large deviations in the future should be revised or explained.
[444]
As I always say, “Revise or explain that.”
[447]
Either you made a mistake and you need to revise it or you feel comfortable and confident
[452]
about what that is.
[453]
Now, you need to explain because if you told me, “I'm confident about that 5 in Capex,”
[461]
great!
[462]
Wow!
[463]
That's a big, big number that you've got to think as to how that impacts the free cash
[468]
flow, and that could cause us to be very bullish on the stock.
[472]
But if it's just that you don't know what the Capex is, then that's not acceptable.
[476]
So in the value model, this is an example of what you would see revenue growth of, let's
[483]
say, roughly 10% but then the error is when an analyst would grow the fixed assets or
[488]
net fixed assets, ultimately, by only one percent.
[493]
So what have you learned?
[494]
Over the long run, companies should grow fixed assets about as fast as revenue.
[499]
Also, if that's not the case in your forecast, then this is an excellent point of discussion
[505]
about your forecast.
[506]
Finally, prevent this error by using the asset turnover ratio.
[511]
I hope that helps you.
[513]
And that gives us a little background on Mistake #3.
[519]
Next time, let's look at Mistake #4: Confusing growth Capex with maintenance Capex.
[524]
I'll see you there.