🔍
What Exactly Is Fracking, And Is It Really That Bad? - YouTube
Channel: Seeker
[0]
In a world that’s demanding more and more energy every year,
[3]
solutions for cheap and accessible fuel are more important than ever.
[8]
There’s an estimated 214.6 TRILLION cubic meters of untapped natural gas underneath our feet around the world,
[17]
and many places are just starting to explore how they could use it.
[21]
So, how do we get it out of the ground, why is this process so controversial...
[26]
and is it worth it?
[30]
See, deep below the earth’s surface, fuels like petroleum and natural gas are trapped inside sedimentary rocks like shale.
[38]
Shale’s properties mean that this fuel isn’t all sitting in one convenient place —
[43]
it’s trapped in tiny little pockets of rock,
[47]
some of which can be up to 20,000 times narrower than a human hair!
[52]
As you can imagine, this makes it pretty much impossible to get the fuel out using conventional drilling methods,
[59]
so instead we use something called fracking.
[62]
This is how it works: A well is drilled wayyyy down into the shale layer—
[67]
this can be a mile or more beneath the Earth’s surface.
[70]
Once it reaches the shale, the well is then drilled horizontally, which again can extend for a mile or more.
[77]
Then a fluid mixture containing water, sand, and a bunch of chemicals
[82]
is blasted down the well at extremely high pressure,
[85]
breaking the shale apart.
[87]
As the gas is released from the rock, it flows back into the well,
[91]
where it can be sucked up to the surface to be collected and separated from the fracking fluid.
[96]
The whole part where the rock is blasted apart by high pressure fluid is where the technique gets its full name:
[102]
‘hydraulic fracturing,’ or fracking for short.
[106]
There are lots of economic arguments used by proponents of fracking to justify its usage.
[112]
Since 2000, oil and natural gas production in the U.S. has boomed dramatically,
[117]
partly thanks to fracking.
[119]
That boom has helped the US become the world’s largest oil producer.
[124]
This in turn has lowered energy prices in some places, for some people, some of the time.
[131]
And the fracking boom did boost jobs in this sector, contributing to overall economic growth.
[138]
But a lot of these stats are just a smokescreen.
[142]
Because see, the fracking industry in the U.S. is actually completely reliant on government subsidies to keep it going,
[150]
and it hemorrhages money—
[152]
the U.S. fracking industry hasn’t actually made any profit in over a decade.
[158]
The price of natural gas is artificially low, and doesn’t accurately reflect the incredible cost of getting that fuel out of the ground.
[168]
Because the other common claim in favor of fracking is that natural gas is better than coal
[174]
in terms of greenhouse gas emissions...
[177]
but that’s just when the end product is burned.
[182]
This idea that fracking is better than coal doesn’t take into account how harmful the fracking process is.
[189]
A recent study out of Cornell University found that when you take into account the large quantities of methane
[196]
and other gases that are released by the PROCESS of fracking,
[200]
fracking overall actually contributes more to global warming than coal does.
[206]
And it’s not just about the greenhouse gases.
[209]
Because fracking is still a process that’s very difficult to control.
[213]
When that high-pressure fluid disturbs the shale to extract the gas,
[218]
there’s a high probability of nearby groundwater becoming contaminated with that gas.
[224]
Or, when the fracking fluid is brought back up to the surface,
[227]
that fluid is often spilled and seeps into the surface and groundwater.
[233]
What’s problematic is that in a lot of cases, these fracking chemicals are actually a secret—
[239]
we may not know what all of them are because they’re ‘confidential business information.’
[246]
Even when we do know what the chemicals are,
[248]
we’re still not sure how some of them may affect human health or ecosystems,
[253]
and for those we do the effects of, we know to be toxic or carcinogenic.
[259]
Chemical contamination has been shown to be an issue of major concern at fracking sites all over the U.S.
[266]
In a particularly extreme example, research published in 2011
[270]
showed that tap water in homes near fracking sites in Pennsylvania
[274]
have been contaminated with methane at a level that is officially classified as dangerous to human health.
[281]
In some cases the methane contamination was so severe that the tap water itself could be lit on fire.
[289]
In addition to contaminating water sources, the actual process of fracking also uses a truly COLOSSAL volume of water.
[299]
Just one fracking well may use anywhere between 1.5 million and 16 million gallons of water
[306]
to squeeze that natural gas out of the shale.
[309]
This can put a strain on communities where fresh water is already in short supply,
[314]
especially in the face of extended droughts and dry seasons due to climate change.
[320]
This water usage is actually only rising as fracking advances,
[324]
because new fracking technology demands more water usage, not less.
[329]
And just as a last little bonus:
[332]
In a few instances, fracking has even induced earthquakes in places that don’t normally experience them.
[339]
The high pressure water blasting and dissolving rock structures deep beneath the surface
[344]
can cause some rockin’ and shakin’ as things shift and rearrange.
[349]
We also have to remember that the products of fracking are still fossil fuels that produce greenhouse gases.
[356]
And while the end product is technically cleaner than coal and conventional oil when burned,
[362]
and fracking does actually use less water than coal production—which is one concrete stat in its favor—
[369]
the debate rages on as to whether fracking in its entirety is worth it.
[375]
So, should we keep pursuing fracking as a solution to our energy needs?
[381]
Or should we be putting that focus toward cleaner, greener technologies?
[386]
In my opinion, we really need to think of it as just a temporary bridge to get us to our more sustainable energy future,
[393]
because while fracking has become commonplace, it’s pretty fracking risky.
[399]
If you liked this video and want to learn more about fuels, then make sure to check out this one here on green hydrogen
[404]
and hit the subscribe button for more energy updates.
[407]
If you have another technology you want us to weigh the costs and benefits of,
[411]
let us know down in the comments below, and as always, thanks for watching.
[414]
I’ll see you next time.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





