🔍
JOBS ACT: cosa significa per noi? - YouTube
Channel: unknown
[3]
On February 20th 2015 the first decrees
of the Jobs Act were approved .
[8]
We've heard, from both the
Government and the Opposition,
[12]
that the Jobs Act is the most important
labor reform of the last years
[16]
but what's changing
for us?
[18]
The answer of Renzi's
Government is clear:
[21]
"the Jobs Act is the good
way to restart Italy's economy"
[24]
"No one will be left behind, there'll be
more protections for those who lose their jobs
[29]
and words as "house loans", "holidays",
"rights" and "leaving bonus"
[32]
we'll be familiar for a generation
who has never known them before".
[36]
Oh yes, because for the Government
the system needs flexibility.
[41]
In a labor market with
too many rules
[45]
firms don't hire, because it's risky,
and so the unemployment rate rises
[49]
and the so called Italy-firm
loses competitiveness.
[51]
Because finally the companies
need flexibility,
[56]
they find it among a bulk of precarious
workers without rights.
[59]
Leaving the market
free to act,
[62]
we'll solve suddenly both the issues
of the country's competitiveness,
[66]
and the unemployment
and the unfair division between
[70]
guaranteed workers
and precarious workers.
[74]
"At last a government
with a clear plan!
[77]
And which wants to
end precariousness!
[80]
Therefore, does the Jobs Act remove
temporary contracts?
[83]
Actually, not.
[85]
The demolition of the crowd of
precarious contracts is a big lie.
[88]
Only the collaboration contract
is abolished,
[91]
but it remains in the sectors where it's
regulated by collective bargaining,
[95]
while all the others remain!
[97]
Indeed, some are
even more convenient!
[100]
Casual work paid with vouchers
will be enhanced
[104]
but primarily, the most frequent
kind of temporary contract
[107]
is being promoted: the
temporary contract.
[110]
In fact, now the employer doesn't
have to justify why it is used
[114]
the number of possible renewals
ha risen,
[116]
and the maximum duration
has been extended.
[118]
Also the apprenticeship
has been liberalized.
[120]
With the Jobs Act a company can
hire more apprentices than before.
[124]
Moreover, with the
excuse to rationalise,
[127]
inspection activities on the workplaces
are weakened.
[130]
The activities of the labor office,
and of other labor institutions,
[133]
are melted in a single
inspection agency.
[135]
If this make the state save money,
it doesn't benefit the workers.
[140]
I understood. So
temporary contracts remain.
[145]
But, at least we have a new
permanent contract
[149]
that guarantees
rising protections.
[151]
The new permanent contract
ensures only permanent uncertainty.
[157]
From now on, when a
court judges a layoff as not justified,
[163]
and only in this
unusual event,
[165]
the worker will receive
the meager compensation
[168]
of two monthly wages
for each year worked,
[170]
up to a maximum of 24 months,
and will forget forever
[174]
the re-integration
on his work place.
[177]
We will be able to be re-integrated only
in case of discriminatory layoff,
[181]
which has never happened so far
in Italian jurisprudence
[185]
If they made equal "precarious"
and "guaranteed"
[187]
it's only because, from now on,
permanent contracts too
[190]
will be precarious.
[192]
Moreover, thanks to a gift
put in the Italian budget sheets,
[195]
Italian employers won't pay taxes
and retirement contributions for three years
[199]
for the workers hired with
the new permanent contract,
[202]
they'll be paid by the taxpayers
for the amount of 8.000€ per year.
[205]
Aah... and so the permanent contract
is not really permanent, but precarious.
[211]
But at least we'll have
new social safety nets
[214]
even for those who
didn't have any protection before.
[217]
Yes. Actually with the new
employment social insurance (Naspi)
[220]
more people can receive
unemployment benefits;
[224]
but on the other side
the amount, duration and the
[226]
amount of retirement contributions decrease.
[229]
Moreover, since the protection for
unjustified and collective layoffs
[232]
disappeared,
"Cassa integrazione" is abolished too,
[235]
a system to avoid layoffs in companies
in crisis, paying part of the salary
[238]
to the workers forced to stay at home
because of the fall of productivity.
[241]
A system that used to keep the workers
togheter and linked with their workplaces.
[245]
From now on, we'll have only
a meager unemployment benefit,
[248]
that we'll receive only proving
to be "really" in search of a new job.
[252]
In other words, if we decline
work or professional training proposals
[258]
of our employment office, maybe
because the work offered
[261]
is hours away from where we live,
has a very low pay, or isn't paid at all,
[265]
there's the possibility that as well
this pittance will be interrupted.
[268]
And it's not over! With the
next decrees of the Jobs Act,
[273]
the employer will be able to switch a
worker to a lower task with a lower pay
[276]
and employers will have
the opportunity to control
[279]
their workers through
several hi-tech devices.
[281]
And so all the promises about
"anyone will be left behind"?
[284]
Maybe at least we could hope
that growth will restart
[288]
thanks to the reform, and
companies will be hiring again
[290]
and probably mostly young people!
[291]
I would not rely on this.
[293]
Haven't you noticed that who says of being
concerned about young people's fate,
[297]
are the same men who wanted and
created precarious contracts?
[300]
Just like the former labor minister Sacconi,
very happy with Renzi's Reform.
[304]
This ruling class, at first created
an awful precarious situation,
[309]
and now is exploiting it to deepen and
generalize it in the name of equality.
[313]
And after all these years of reforms, do
you see a decrease of unemployment?!
[318]
Mostly for the youth? The truth
is that youth unemployment
[322]
decreases only when the
general unemployment decreases.
[325]
And the workers protections
have nothing to do with it.
[328]
If you don't trust me,
listen to Oliver Blanchard
[330]
chief economist of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
[333]
who candidly admitted that
"The differences among
[336]
the work protection systems are
not related to the differences
[341]
among the unemployment rates
of the different countries"
[343]
It means that the hope to decrease
unemployment rates with the Jobs Act
[347]
is science fiction, as well as
the myth of growth.
[350]
You can get an explanation of this
also from the OECD,
[353]
which after many years questioned whether
work flexibility could lead to growth.
[358]
We have to get it!
[360]
Renzi's Government has nothing
to do with our needs.
[364]
The growth they speak about is
only the growth of our exploitation!
[369]
But then... if they don't do it
neither for precarious workers,
[371]
nor for the unemployed
and nor for the growth...
[375]
who did they do
this Jobs Act for?
[377]
They did it to increase
their profits.
[380]
In the last decades, in all
the eurozone countries,
[383]
workers salaries increased
less than the labor productivity.
[387]
Only capitalists' pockets took
advantage from all this
[391]
And this happened also in the so
celebrated German model.
[395]
And the ECB president
Draghi said it clearly:
[400]
"This is the password
to exit the crisis"
[402]
But the truth is that they are
simply taking advantage from the crisis!
[406]
Because with the crisis
unemployment rates rise,
[409]
and we start fighting
each other,
[412]
carving up the few crumbs
they concede us.
[415]
The Government deceived
us with the Jobs Act,
[417]
hoping to use our individualism and
to put us one against another.
[422]
Precarious against protected,
young against old people,
[425]
women against men...
Renzi's outcome is simple
[429]
workers of the world:
slaughter each other!
[433]
But then everything
is lost!
[435]
We are completely alone,
exposed without any protection
[439]
to the whims
of the bosses.
[440]
We'll be forced to make
war among us.
[443]
No! We must remember that
every protection, right,
[447]
and improvement of our
conditions
[450]
were snatched when the
workers rose their head.
[453]
We can learn the only possible
answer to such a strong attack
[457]
from the masters by the
proletarians of Paris in 1848,
[461]
they repeated it with the
students in 1968,
[465]
it's shouted today by the workers
in the strikes of the logistics sector:
[469]
WORKERS OF THE WORLD
UNITE!
[478]
An article that explains in English
what is the Jobs Act, is in the
English section of our web site.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





