JOBS ACT: cosa significa per noi? - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[3]
On February 20th 2015 the first decrees of the Jobs Act were approved .
[8]
We've heard, from both the Government and the Opposition,
[12]
that the Jobs Act is the most important labor reform of the last years
[16]
but what's changing for us?
[18]
The answer of Renzi's Government is clear:
[21]
"the Jobs Act is the good way to restart Italy's economy"
[24]
"No one will be left behind, there'll be more protections for those who lose their jobs
[29]
and words as "house loans", "holidays", "rights" and "leaving bonus"
[32]
we'll be familiar for a generation who has never known them before".
[36]
Oh yes, because for the Government the system needs flexibility.
[41]
In a labor market with too many rules
[45]
firms don't hire, because it's risky, and so the unemployment rate rises
[49]
and the so called Italy-firm loses competitiveness.
[51]
Because finally the companies need flexibility,
[56]
they find it among a bulk of precarious workers without rights.
[59]
Leaving the market free to act,
[62]
we'll solve suddenly both the issues of the country's competitiveness,
[66]
and the unemployment and the unfair division between
[70]
guaranteed workers and precarious workers.
[74]
"At last a government with a clear plan!
[77]
And which wants to end precariousness!
[80]
Therefore, does the Jobs Act remove temporary contracts?
[83]
Actually, not.
[85]
The demolition of the crowd of precarious contracts is a big lie.
[88]
Only the collaboration contract is abolished,
[91]
but it remains in the sectors where it's regulated by collective bargaining,
[95]
while all the others remain!
[97]
Indeed, some are even more convenient!
[100]
Casual work paid with vouchers will be enhanced
[104]
but primarily, the most frequent kind of temporary contract
[107]
is being promoted: the temporary contract.
[110]
In fact, now the employer doesn't have to justify why it is used
[114]
the number of possible renewals ha risen,
[116]
and the maximum duration has been extended.
[118]
Also the apprenticeship has been liberalized.
[120]
With the Jobs Act a company can hire more apprentices than before.
[124]
Moreover, with the excuse to rationalise,
[127]
inspection activities on the workplaces are weakened.
[130]
The activities of the labor office, and of other labor institutions,
[133]
are melted in a single inspection agency.
[135]
If this make the state save money, it doesn't benefit the workers.
[140]
I understood. So temporary contracts remain.
[145]
But, at least we have a new permanent contract
[149]
that guarantees rising protections.
[151]
The new permanent contract ensures only permanent uncertainty.
[157]
From now on, when a court judges a layoff as not justified,
[163]
and only in this unusual event,
[165]
the worker will receive the meager compensation
[168]
of two monthly wages for each year worked,
[170]
up to a maximum of 24 months, and will forget forever
[174]
the re-integration on his work place.
[177]
We will be able to be re-integrated only in case of discriminatory layoff,
[181]
which has never happened so far in Italian jurisprudence
[185]
If they made equal "precarious" and "guaranteed"
[187]
it's only because, from now on, permanent contracts too
[190]
will be precarious.
[192]
Moreover, thanks to a gift put in the Italian budget sheets,
[195]
Italian employers won't pay taxes and retirement contributions for three years
[199]
for the workers hired with the new permanent contract,
[202]
they'll be paid by the taxpayers for the amount of 8.000€ per year.
[205]
Aah... and so the permanent contract is not really permanent, but precarious.
[211]
But at least we'll have new social safety nets
[214]
even for those who didn't have any protection before.
[217]
Yes. Actually with the new employment social insurance (Naspi)
[220]
more people can receive unemployment benefits;
[224]
but on the other side the amount, duration and the
[226]
amount of retirement contributions decrease.
[229]
Moreover, since the protection for unjustified and collective layoffs
[232]
disappeared, "Cassa integrazione" is abolished too,
[235]
a system to avoid layoffs in companies in crisis, paying part of the salary
[238]
to the workers forced to stay at home because of the fall of productivity.
[241]
A system that used to keep the workers togheter and linked with their workplaces.
[245]
From now on, we'll have only a meager unemployment benefit,
[248]
that we'll receive only proving to be "really" in search of a new job.
[252]
In other words, if we decline work or professional training proposals
[258]
of our employment office, maybe because the work offered
[261]
is hours away from where we live, has a very low pay, or isn't paid at all,
[265]
there's the possibility that as well this pittance will be interrupted.
[268]
And it's not over! With the next decrees of the Jobs Act,
[273]
the employer will be able to switch a worker to a lower task with a lower pay
[276]
and employers will have the opportunity to control
[279]
their workers through several hi-tech devices.
[281]
And so all the promises about "anyone will be left behind"?
[284]
Maybe at least we could hope that growth will restart
[288]
thanks to the reform, and companies will be hiring again
[290]
and probably mostly young people!
[291]
I would not rely on this.
[293]
Haven't you noticed that who says of being concerned about young people's fate,
[297]
are the same men who wanted and created precarious contracts?
[300]
Just like the former labor minister Sacconi, very happy with Renzi's Reform.
[304]
This ruling class, at first created an awful precarious situation,
[309]
and now is exploiting it to deepen and generalize it in the name of equality.
[313]
And after all these years of reforms, do you see a decrease of unemployment?!
[318]
Mostly for the youth? The truth is that youth unemployment
[322]
decreases only when the general unemployment decreases.
[325]
And the workers protections have nothing to do with it.
[328]
If you don't trust me, listen to Oliver Blanchard
[330]
chief economist of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
[333]
who candidly admitted that "The differences among
[336]
the work protection systems are not related to the differences
[341]
among the unemployment rates of the different countries"
[343]
It means that the hope to decrease unemployment rates with the Jobs Act
[347]
is science fiction, as well as the myth of growth.
[350]
You can get an explanation of this also from the OECD,
[353]
which after many years questioned whether work flexibility could lead to growth.
[358]
We have to get it!
[360]
Renzi's Government has nothing to do with our needs.
[364]
The growth they speak about is only the growth of our exploitation!
[369]
But then... if they don't do it neither for precarious workers,
[371]
nor for the unemployed and nor for the growth...
[375]
who did they do this Jobs Act for?
[377]
They did it to increase their profits.
[380]
In the last decades, in all the eurozone countries,
[383]
workers salaries increased less than the labor productivity.
[387]
Only capitalists' pockets took advantage from all this
[391]
And this happened also in the so celebrated German model.
[395]
And the ECB president Draghi said it clearly:
[400]
"This is the password to exit the crisis"
[402]
But the truth is that they are simply taking advantage from the crisis!
[406]
Because with the crisis unemployment rates rise,
[409]
and we start fighting each other,
[412]
carving up the few crumbs they concede us.
[415]
The Government deceived us with the Jobs Act,
[417]
hoping to use our individualism and to put us one against another.
[422]
Precarious against protected, young against old people,
[425]
women against men... Renzi's outcome is simple
[429]
workers of the world: slaughter each other!
[433]
But then everything is lost!
[435]
We are completely alone, exposed without any protection
[439]
to the whims of the bosses.
[440]
We'll be forced to make war among us.
[443]
No! We must remember that every protection, right,
[447]
and improvement of our conditions
[450]
were snatched when the workers rose their head.
[453]
We can learn the only possible answer to such a strong attack
[457]
from the masters by the proletarians of Paris in 1848,
[461]
they repeated it with the students in 1968,
[465]
it's shouted today by the workers in the strikes of the logistics sector:
[469]
WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE!
[478]
An article that explains in English what is the Jobs Act, is in the English section of our web site.