How We Could Study the First Nanoseconds of the Universe - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[0]
[♪ INTRO]
[3]
Telescopes, you may have heard, are time machines.
[6]
Because light has a speed limit, the deeper into space we look, the older the signal we receive.
[11]
The oldest light we can see is called the Cosmic Microwave Background,
[14]
and it comes from when the universe was less than 400,000 years old.
[18]
And while that’s great and all, it also means there are 400 thousand years of history
[22]
we can’t study using traditional methods.
[24]
That’s why astronomers are so interested in finding techniques that don’t rely on light.
[28]
And luckily for them, and us, there are some other waves out there
[32]
that could reveal the universe when it was a teeny tiny fraction of a second old.
[36]
I’m talking about gravitational waves.
[38]
Over a century ago, Albert Einstein taught us that mass deforms the fabric of spacetime,
[43]
kind of like how a bowling ball deforms a trampoline.
[45]
But he also predicted that accelerating mass would cause space itself to ripple,
[50]
like the surface of a pond.
[52]
And back in 2015, we directly detected these gravitational waves for the first time.
[56]
That was thanks to a pair of black holes spiraling inward and merging with one another.
[61]
But technically, lots of things in space can cause gravitational waves.
[64]
And if we think of spacetime like the surface of a lake, all of these astronomical events
[68]
are like raindrops, whose gravitational waves interfere with one another and generate a kind of noise.
[74]
Theoretically, we could someday pick apart that noise to study specific events.
[78]
But what’s maybe even more interesting is that, beneath that noise,
[82]
space is actually filled with evidence of other, older gravitational waves.
[86]
And those waves could teach us about the birth of the universe itself.
[90]
Waves from way back then are called primordial gravitational waves,
[94]
and there are a few proposed sources for them.
[96]
According to many cosmologists, some were generated by the formation and merger of
[100]
still-hypothetical primordial black holes.
[102]
These objects would act like regular black holes, but would be less massive,
[106]
and may have sprung up from pockets of super dense matter in the very early universe.
[110]
Other primordial gravitational waves could have been generated by the formation of various
[114]
particles as the universe cooled down.
[116]
The ultimate primordial waves though, weren’t caused by stuff in space, they were made by space itself.
[123]
They come from a hypothetical period in the universe’s history called inflation.
[126]
It’s the time a tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang, around 10-32 to 10-36 seconds,
[135]
when most cosmologists believe the universe expanded way faster than the speed of light.
[139]
For the record, this wouldn’t break the law that says nothing can travel faster than
[143]
the speed of light, because that law only applies to matter in space, not to space itself.
[148]
Regardless, inflation still isn’t set in stone.
[151]
There are definitely alternative interpretations for what could have happened back then.
[155]
Gravitational waves are predicted in these alternative hypotheses, too, but detecting
[159]
primordial waves will hopefully give cosmologists the data they need to pin down what actually happened.
[165]
For example, they could use the amplitude of the waves to help define how fast everything expanded,
[170]
the energy involved in inflation, and exactly when and for how long it happened.
[174]
And through other methods, they could learn how consistent that inflation was across the whole universe.
[179]
Of course, before we can figure out any of that, we have to actually detect these waves.
[182]
And we do have a few options.
[184]
First, there’s the indirect method of detection,
[186]
which comes from looking at the Cosmic Microwave Background.
[189]
According to the math, gravitational waves older than the CMB would have influenced what it looks like.
[195]
Specifically, they would have caused a certain spiral pattern in the light that cosmologists
[199]
call B-mode polarization.
[200]
We can already detect a different kind of polarization in the CMB, called E-mode,
[204]
and scientists are investigating the B-mode kind.
[207]
But it’s hard because it’s a way weaker effect, and these signals can also
[211]
come from things like dust in the Milky Way.
[213]
The other option, of course, is to just try to directly detect primordial gravitational waves,
[218]
using equipment similar to what we’ve used to detect the waves from black hole mergers.
[222]
Right now, to detect those events, we mainly use interferometers like LIGO,
[226]
which send laser pulses down two perpendicular arms.
[229]
If a gravitational wave passes through the system, it will compress or stretch things,
[234]
meaning one laser beam will have to travel farther than the other.
[237]
Unfortunately, none of our current interferometers is sensitive enough to detect primordial waves,
[243]
but there are future projects in the works.
[245]
The main one is LISA, which will work roughly the same way as LIGO, except in space.
[249]
It’ll consist of three spacecraft, arranged in a triangle and separated by millions of
[254]
kilometers, and it’s scheduled to launch in 2034.
[257]
The other direct detection method uses dense, spinning objects called pulsars.
[261]
They shoot out beams of radiation as they rotate, which can hit Earth at really regular intervals.
[266]
But if a gravitational wave passed through the space between the pulsar and Earth,
[270]
that interval would change.
[271]
And astronomers would be able to use details about the wave’s signal
[275]
to figure out if they came from primordial or recent sources.
[278]
Still, figuring out what “normal” means is complicated, because even if pulsars are
[283]
known for being predictable, there are still other factors that can affect how fast they rotate.
[288]
And it’s going to take time for scientists to pin down a model that’s good enough to use pulsars effectively.
[293]
But once we find those elusive primordial waves, it will mean big things for astronomy.
[297]
We’ll be able to figure out more about inflation, and see back further than we ever have before.
[302]
And with more research, we’re getting closer and closer to understanding
[305]
the moment our universe’s story began.
[308]
Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow Space!
[310]
If you want to learn more about other tools we could use to study the universe,
[313]
you can watch our episode about the Cosmic Neutrino Background after this.
[316]
[♪ OUTRO]