Buffett: The Truth About Asset Allocation Models - YouTube

Channel: iValue Investing

[49]
WARREN BUFFETT: Yeah, we think the best way to minimize risk is to think.
[53]
(Laughter)
[55]
And the idea that you have — you know, you say,  
[58]
“I’ve got 60 percent in stocks  and 40 percent in bonds,”
[61]
and then have a big announcement,  now we’re moving it to 65/35, 
[65]
as some strategists or whatever  they call them in Wall Street do.
[70]
I mean, that has to be pure nonsense. I mean,
[76]
60/40 or 65/30 — it just doesn’t make any sense.
[79]
What you ought to do is have — your default  position is always short-term instruments.
[85]
And whenever you see anything  intelligent to do, you should do it.
[87]
And you shouldn’t be trying to  match up with some goal like that.
[93]
I found it entertaining — I was just reading  yesterday in an article, I think it was,
[98]
about the two fellows at Google
[100]
and all of the problems they’re going to  
[102]
have because they’re each going  to get a few billion dollars.
[105]
I mean, it was — I want to send a sympathy card.
[108]
I almost went down to Hallmark  store because this article went on —
[112]
they’ve got this terrible problem and that terrible and they’re going to need lawyers,
[115]
and they’re going to need financial  — they don’t need anybody.
[117]
Those guys are smarter than the  people that are coming to them. 
[120]
And they do not have a big problem,
[122]
and they are very capable of thinking it through themselves.
[125]
The people that have the problem are the  people who want to sell their services to them
[129]
and are going to have to convince  them that they have a problem.
[132]
But so much of what you see when you talk about asset allocation —
[139]
it’s just merchandising.
[140]
It’s a way to make you think that if you don’t  
[142]
know how to determine whether  it should be 60/40 or 65/35,
[146]
that you need these people. And you  don’t need them at all in investing.
[150]
Most of the professionals that  
[154]
tell you that you’re going to get in  great trouble unless you listen to them
[157]
and sign up for their services, you  know, they’re good at selling, but —
[165]
It’s what my brother-in-law — former brother-in-law — that 
[167]
worked at the stockyards used to say was that  people would bring in cattle or something.
[172]
And I’d say to him, you know,
[173]
“How do get the farmer to employ you  to sell to Swift or Armour or Cudahy
[180]
instead of the guy right next to you.  I mean, you know, a cow is a cow and
[186]
Armour’s going to buy it the same way.”
[189]
And he gave me this disgusted look and he said, “Warren,
[191]
it’s not how you sell them, it’s how you tell them.”
[194]
Well, there’s a lot of that in Wall Street.
[196]
Charlie?
[198]
CHARLIE MUNGER: Yeah, people have always  had this craving to know the future.
[202]
You know, the king used to  hire the magician or the  
[206]
forecaster and he’d look in  sheep guts or something for
[209]
an answer as to how to handle the next war.
[212]
And so there’s always been a market for people who
[216]
purported to know the future  based on their expertise.
[219]
And there’s a lot of that still  going on. It’s just as crazy
[223]
as when the king was hiring the  forecaster who looked at the sheep guts.
[229]
And people have an economic  incentive to sell some nostrum.
[235]
It can be sold over and over and over again.
[239]
The really interesting figures  are when you combine the 
[243]
underperformance of the market,  say, by the mutual fund industry,
[247]
which is probably a couple of points per annum.
[251]
And that understates it.
[253]
Now, if you take all of the
[255]
investors in the mutual funds who are constantly  whipsawing from one fund to another
[261]
by a bunch of brokers who want commissions,
[264]
now you take a sub-normal performance and it  goes on another three or four percentages points
[271]
due to the shuffling of the  mutual fund investments.
[274]
So the poor guy in the general public
[278]
is getting a terrible result  from contacting the experts.
[283]
And these guys are hitting the Scout troop  and the Community Chest drive and are  
[287]
locally reputable people.
[289]
I think it’s disgusting.
[291]
It’s much better to make a living by  being part of system that delivers value
[297]
to the people who are buying the product.
[302]
But nobody refrains from creating gambling  casinos or something, on my theory.
[311]
If it’ll work to make money, why,  we tend to do it in this country.