Cost-Benefit Net Present Value - YouTube

Channel: unknown

[1]
in an earlier video we looked at
[3]
discounting now we're gonna see how to
[5]
apply it to determine a project's
[7]
feasibility let's look at the net
[9]
present value let's say these are your
[11]
total cash flows for the project you've
[13]
got the large costs at the beginning to
[15]
build it and get started
[16]
you've got the upkeep and maintenance
[18]
costs every year and every year you gain
[21]
the benefits I don't know what this
[22]
project would be maybe it's like a train
[24]
or something adding the costs and the
[26]
benefits for each of the years gives you
[28]
the net benefits or costs for each year
[30]
and then combining the net benefits for
[32]
the whole project shows you you will net
[33]
two thousand dollars for the whole
[34]
project but we haven't discounted yet so
[37]
let's do that now let's use a discount
[39]
rate of 10% so we divide each year by
[42]
one plus the discount rate to the power
[44]
of the year so that's one point one to
[47]
the power of zero for the present year
[48]
which is just one so it doesn't change
[50]
which makes sense for the present year
[52]
one point one ^ 1 for the first year 1
[56]
point 1 ^ 2 for the second year 1 point
[60]
1 ^ 3 for the third year and so on these
[65]
are now the net present benefits or net
[66]
present costs for each year now if we
[68]
add all this up we find the net present
[70]
value for the project 355 dollars so
[74]
that's bad why is it so much less now we
[77]
value gains and losses in the future
[79]
less than me value gains and losses
[81]
today so the gains we got later in the
[83]
project aren't as important when we
[85]
consider the opportunity cost of capital
[86]
for most projects we pay money upfront
[89]
that isn't discounted much because they
[91]
happen in the present whereas the
[92]
benefits that accrue over the life of
[94]
the project are discounted more and more
[96]
because they happen later in the future
[97]
so in general as a discount rate
[100]
increases the net present value will
[102]
decrease let's look at something a
[103]
little different let's pretend putting
[105]
our money into an investment at 10
[107]
percent interest is our project let's
[109]
use a discount rate that is also 10
[111]
percent in year zero we will be down
[113]
$1,000 from putting it into the
[115]
investment and in five years we will
[117]
receive five years of compound interest
[118]
six hundred and ten dollars and 51 cents
[120]
plus our principal sum of $1,000 so
[123]
let's discount to factor in the time
[125]
preference since the interest rate is
[127]
the same as the discount rate you can
[129]
probably predict what's going to happen
[130]
1600 $10.51 divided by 1.1 ^
[135]
is $1,000 so adding up our present
[138]
values we get a thousand minus a
[140]
thousand which equals zero so what does
[143]
that mean remember our discount rate is
[145]
meant to represent the opportunity cost
[147]
of capital we want to compare all costs
[148]
and benefits from each year to that
[150]
opportunity cost in an economic analysis
[152]
and that present value of zero tells us
[154]
Society is just as well off with or
[156]
without the project the marginal
[158]
opportunity cost of society's money is
[160]
the same as this project our project in
[162]
this case just being the interest rate
[164]
let's say the interest rate of our
[166]
project was 8% but we're still going to
[168]
discount at a rate of 10%
[170]
well our return becomes fourteen hundred
[172]
and sixty nine dollars and 33 cents
[174]
obviously less than the previous example
[176]
which makes the net present value of
[177]
this project using a 10% discount rate
[180]
to be negative eighty-seven dollars and
[182]
67 cents that negative number is telling
[184]
us that society is better off without
[186]
this project that we would be losing
[188]
money if we invested in this project if
[190]
the interest rate was 12% higher than
[192]
our discount rate then the net present
[194]
value would be 94 dollars and 28 cents
[196]
which is telling us that this project is
[198]
better than our opportunity cost of
[199]
capital that we can make more money by
[201]
investing in this project so our most
[203]
basic decision rule when considering net
[205]
present value is to reject any project
[207]
that has a negative net present value
[209]
and then only consider projects with a
[210]
positive net present value so how do we
[212]
compare projects let's look at four
[214]
different projects a B C and E project V
[217]
has the highest net present value does
[219]
that mean it's the best option in a way
[221]
maybe but maybe not pragmatically
[223]
the net present value only tells us the
[226]
net value but we will probably be
[228]
working on a budget for example two
[230]
projects can have a net present value of
[231]
$500 but one could have the present
[233]
value of cost of a thousand and a
[235]
present value of benefits of 1500 and
[237]
the other a present value cost of a
[239]
million dollars and a present value
[240]
benefits of a million five hundred
[242]
dollars technically the same societal
[244]
benefit and they're equally justified
[246]
but we may not have a million dollars to
[248]
work with we need to look at the
[249]
investment costs of these projects let's
[251]
assume these are all separable we can do
[253]
any combination of them this present
[255]
value of investment cost represents what
[257]
amount is required from us to fund the
[259]
project it's not necessarily a measure
[261]
of the total present costs it's just
[263]
telling us how much money we would need
[264]
to start with so if our budget is four
[267]
million dollars then what are our
[269]
our possible combinations here we could
[270]
go with project a and B or we go with
[273]
project C and D or just a just B just C
[276]
or just D there are a couple other
[278]
combinations but they won't fit on the
[280]
screen so screw them since project a and
[282]
B together give the highest net present
[284]
value we should go with that option we
[286]
always want to pick the projects that
[287]
give the highest net present value let's
[289]
say project a was no longer an option
[291]
then we would just pick the next best
[294]
project the one that has the next
[295]
highest net present value in this case
[297]
just project B the extra money left over
[300]
from our budget can be spent somewhere
[301]
else which might be good but this
[303]
shouldn't affect our decision at all
[304]
it's not like we add the leftover budget
[307]
to our net present value or anything
[309]
like that because unless there is a
[310]
project explicitly planned for this
[312]
money we will assume it will sit
[313]
somewhere at the same interest rate as
[315]
the discount rate and remember from our
[317]
first example the net present value will
[319]
then be zero okay let's look at another
[321]
bunch of projects but this time we'll
[322]
assume there's no budget constraints
[324]
also these projects are making use of
[326]
the same land and there non-separable
[327]
which would you pick project death gives
[329]
the highest net present value but
[331]
project G gives a really good net
[332]
present value for significantly less
[334]
cost should we go with that one the one
[336]
with more net present value per
[337]
investment costs well no with no budget
[340]
constraints this doesn't matter it costs
[343]
six million more dollars to get started
[344]
than project G but the higher net
[346]
present value also tells you that it has
[348]
way higher benefits and in the end is
[350]
offering more benefits than project G so
[352]
choosing project F gives the higher
[354]
value to society even though it has
[356]
higher costs okay so in summary reject
[358]
projects that have a negative net
[360]
present value and only consider projects
[362]
that have a positive net present value
[364]
with no budget constraints just pick the
[366]
project or a series of projects that
[367]
have the highest net present values and
[369]
lastly with budget constraints you will
[371]
also have to look at the investment
[373]
costs and pick the project or series of
[375]
projects that give the highest net
[376]
present value while also conforming to
[378]
the budget in the next video we'll look
[380]
at the internal rate of return as
[381]
another measure of project feasibility
[386]
you