馃攳
How To Transfer Money Out Of IRA With Less Tax - YouTube
Channel: unknown
[0]
This is the number 1 strategy for tax
savings on an IRA? We are going to
[6]
address the question in this episode how
do I transfer money out of my IRA's or
[12]
401K's or other qualified plans into a
tax-free vehicle.
[18]
I'm Doug Andrew you're going to be blown
away when you see how to do this. And
[21]
this is an actual client that we helped
optimize their assets and minimize a ton
[27]
of tax by doing this strategic rollout.
[39]
So, I'm Doug Andrew. And I've been a
financial strategist, retirement planning
[45]
specialist, tax minimization specialist
for 47 years. I helped a lot of my own
[50]
clients with these strategies. And then
in 2003 to 2007, I trained over 3,000
[56]
CPAs, tax attorneys, financial advisers on
these strategies. But I got frustrated
[62]
because they weren't going out and
helping their clients. They said, "Doug, we
[66]
don't have time to educate people like
you do." So, what the public doesn't know
[70]
won't hurt them. Well, yes. I see a ton of
people paying unnecessary tax on their
[76]
IRA's or 401K's at retirement. And so,
that's when I let all my professional
[82]
licenses automatically expire the last
business day of 2005. To become a
[87]
consumer advocate, to write books and to
do educational videos. And my most recent
[93]
book the Laser Fund has actually 14
chapters of charts and graphs. But this
[99]
side has about 100 pages with 12
chapters. And it talks about stories
[105]
and examples. And this is one of them in
this book that we actually helped this
[110]
70-year-old man get money out of his
IRA's and 401K's with no tax consequence.
[117]
I'm going to simplify this and I want you
to understand that this man is very
[122]
typical to many, many people that come to
us and they thought they were going to
[129]
be in a lower tax bracket when they
retire. This gentleman did
[133]
well for himself. He owned a lot of
rental properties and these were
[137]
duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes and so
forth.
[140]
The smaller apartment complexes. He done
very well for himself. So, he didn't need
[146]
income out of his IRA's to live on
in retirement. And so, he sort of took the
[153]
advice that most CPAs give. "Oh, if you
don't need the money.
[156]
Defer. Just put it off and postpone
until your age 70 陆." Now, you
[163]
have to start pulling it out at age 72
to avoid a 50% penalty. When he came to
[168]
us at the age was 70 陆. So, he
came and he said, "You know what? I have to
[173]
start pulling money out of my IRA's and
401K. Now or I'm going to be penalized 50%.
[178]
The CPA says, "I should just take out the
required minimum. What do you think?" And I
[182]
went, "That's the worst advice I've ever
heard." So, let me show you what his
[188]
advisor told him to do. Now, this was in
the year 2010-2011. And this man had his
[197]
IRA's and 401K's from 2000 to 2010 in
the market. He had saved 600
[205]
thousand dollars. But that 600,000 in the year 2000, went down to
[209]
less than 360,000 from by 2003 because of the
[214]
market. It dived and for 3 years in a
row. It took 4 years to get back to
[219]
600,000 in 2007. Then in
2008, he lost 30% again and went down to
[224]
three hundred some odd thousand. It took...
Until he came to us in 2010, 2011 for it
[232]
to be back to 600,000. We
call that the Lost Decade. So, when he
[236]
came to us, he finally had his 600,000
back that he had 10
[241]
years earlier. Isn't that sad? Now, his
advisor said, "Hang in there? Hang in there.
[248]
The market will always come back but
take out just the minimum distribution."
[253]
The financial services industry has a
standard. It's called the 4-percent
[258]
rule. If your money is in the market,
Dowel Bar who studies investor behavior
[263]
says that the average investor in the
Mar
[266]
get especially in retirement only earns
about 3.49%
[271]
because they're buying and selling at
the wrong times. I mean, if they button
[274]
held, they would earn about 9.14%. But 9%
[279]
without paying tax is really only
netting them 6% becuse you got to
[282]
pay tax of about a third. Well, he knew
that. But the advisor didn't want to be
[288]
sued for him out living his money. So, the
advisor said, "You know what?" Just take out
[293]
the 4%. Well, this is pretty
pathetic. What's 4% on
[298]
600,000? A measly 24,000. He pulls out
[303]
24,000 and he has to pay tax of a
third. He's in a 33-percent
[307]
bracket between federal and state tax
that was 8,000 of the
[312]
24. So, here he is pulling out 24,000. He's netting only
[317]
16,000 to buy gas and groceries,
prescriptions and golf green fees. That's
[322]
pretty pathetic. If he dies would only
really leave behind 600,000
[328]
to his heirs because his wife when he
came to us had just passed away. So, if he
[334]
dies, his children will have that 600,000. And they have to get
[338]
that out and taxed within 10 years now
or else they're penalized 50%.
[343]
So, it's really only worth 400,000 to his kids. Have you got the
[349]
scenario? This is what most advisors and
CPAs tell you to do. Let me show you how
[356]
we dramatically increased his retirement
income and saved him a grundle in
[362]
unnecessary tax. So, stay with me. And
you'll see this is so powerful. We have
[369]
done this for thousands of people. What
we did is we had this man take
[375]
withdrawals out of his 600,000
far more than he needed to live
[380]
on. He didn't even really need this money
but he was forced to take it out. But
[384]
that's a pretty pathetic rate of return.
So, we told him to take out
[387]
$12,500 a month in
a payout.
[391]
We had his money diversified into a
portfolio. And the 600,000
[397]
was in an instrument that would allow
him
[400]
to realize about an 8 and a quarter
percent effective rate of return on his
[405]
money. He was able to pull out 12,500 a
month or $150,000
[411]
a year out of his 600,000. Now, if you do the math,
[416]
150,000 times 5
years is 750. Well, yeah. Because he's
[422]
earning interest on his money while he's
rolling it out. Your money just doesn't
[427]
stop growing. But we increased his rate
of return quite a bit more than double
[433]
than the 4% payout with his
money in the market. The point is this:
[438]
Worst case scenario, if he pulled out 150,000 each year,
[444]
it's like, "Well, I don't need the money.
Why am i pulling out more than the RMD?"
[449]
To get the taxes over and done with
sooner than later and reposition it into
[455]
something tax-free from now on. Let's say
that he pulled out 150
[459]
and in a 33-percent bracket, he
paid a third in tax. That's 50 grand. So,
[465]
after 5 years, he withdrew 750,000. It's all out
[471]
of there. And he paid a third of that.
That's 250,000 in
[475]
tax. People say, "Well, that was bad advice."
No. You're not safe. He's going to
[480]
pay it sooner or later. Later is going to
be more than that. So, let's do the math.
[484]
He pulls out 750,000 over 5
years.
[488]
He pays 250,000 in
tax. What does he have left? 500
[492]
thousand. Now, that 500,000,
he has that in his Laser Fund. That's my
[497]
favorite vehicle to reposition the money
after tax money. 500,000
[503]
and his laser fund was earning between
8% to 10%. Because we were rebalancing, he
[510]
actually was earning 10. Let's just take
8. So, 8% on 500
[514]
thousand is 40,000 a year tax-free. That's just the interest. How much
[519]
more is 40,000 than 16,000?
A lot more, okay? But he was
[525]
actually earning 10%. So, 10%
on 500,000
[529]
in the laser fund is 50,000. 50,000
tax-free is how much more than 16. A
[536]
triple, okay?
Now, that's not where we ended. See, I'm a
[541]
tax strategist. What we did is the third
part of a strategic rollout. We
[548]
resurrected some deductions he had been
killing. How did we do that? So, we already
[555]
had enabled him to be able to have
triple the amount of money cash flow
[561]
tax-free by doing the strategic rollout
increasing his rate of return actually
[567]
increasing the safety and of course the
tax advantages. But you know what? I just
[572]
can't stand to just do that. I want to
dramatically increase his net spendable
[578]
income by saving unnecessary tax. So, in
his case, he had several of these rental
[583]
properties. Duplexes, triplexes and so
forth. And he had been paying them off
[588]
thinking that was his retirement, that
was pretty good. I said, "Wait a minute.
[593]
Do you understand the velocity of money?"
If you borrow money out of those rental
[599]
properties at 4.5%
which is the interest rate at the time,
[603]
it's tax deductible. On Schedule E or on
your LLC's, you can tax deduct the
[609]
interest. So, every million he borrows on
those apartments at 4.5%,
[615]
that's 45,000 of interest he
gets to deduct. In a 33-percent
[619]
bracket, it's only costing him 30,000 on every million. So, he's making
[625]
in his laser Fund 8 to 10 percent.
Let's just take the average 9. How
[630]
much more is 9 and 3? He's making
300% on every dollar. On
[636]
every million he borrows, he pays 30,000 a year and he makes 90,000.
[641]
He says, "Doug, you're making me so much
money. I don't know what to do with all
[644]
this money." I said, "Well, we can... You can
give it to me. You can give it to charity.
[649]
You can do so much more with it." He used
this to bless the lives of his kids and
[654]
grandkids in his family bank which is
another concept. But what was the
[657]
strategic byproduct that came along for
the ride?
[661]
Those new
deductions that were no longer on his
[665]
tax return when he paid off those rental
properties came back onto his tax
[669]
returns. That gave him the ability to
earn 3 times the cost of the funds
[674]
for the mortgage. But it offset. Every
year he pulled out 150.
[680]
The deductions on his rental properties
now were equal to that. It saved him the
[686]
50,000 of tax every year for
5 years. 5 x 50,000, we
[693]
saved him a quarter of a million dollars
there. But as we rolled it out, we
[698]
actually did it over a 5-year period.
And so, guess what? He didn't have a net
[704]
of 500,000 in his Laser Fund. He had
a net at the end of 5 years of
[710]
750,000. He got all
this out with growth tax-free.
[718]
750,000 now at 8% gives him 60,000 a year.
[724]
Not 30. At 10%, he can take out
75,000 a year tax-free.
[731]
How much more or better is 75
than 16. People sit here and they go...
[737]
They get this deer-in-the-headlight look.
Like, "What, you really did that?" And when
[742]
he dies, what did he leave behind to his
heirs here? A net of 400. Here, if
[747]
he dies, this inside the Laser Fund which
I explained in this book blossoms to a
[754]
million two hundred thousand. Triple, okay?
Why would you generate this much income
[760]
in retirement when you could generate
3-4 times that? And why would you
[764]
leave behind this --400,000
when you died when you could leave
[769]
behind triple that if it doesn't cost
you anything? You can actually have your
[773]
cake and eat it too.
If this is resonating with you, read this
[778]
story and others in this book. I would
love for you to get a free copy. You can
[783]
click on this episode, watch it. You'll
understand this concept. And I'll fire
[788]
one out to you. You just pay $5.95 shipping and handling. But there's
[791]
other episodes also I want you to watch
the relate that shows
[795]
several examples just like this one.
Most Recent Videos:
You can go back to the homepage right here: Homepage





